@Tully2001 You can take a look at the videos ... Your plane has been amazing.
https://youtu.be/2geqgq8FkCQ
https://youtu.be/mpRzdWG4L1g
https://youtu.be/54KVoq0_pAw
@Dimkal Hi! I´m from Spain. I design this Hellenic Air Force F-16 because the roundels insignias could be Portugal, Turkey and Greece. I like Greece much more ;-) i hope you like it! i will make a Greek F-4 Phantom II ;-)
Use this tools mods...
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Mods/View/483588/Fine-Tuner
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Mods/View/870822/Upload-with-Screenshots
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Mods/View/524146/Overload
And take a look these videos...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ydwj2PVW90
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLyqjNYJT0s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__MQiQvYv5E
And this one... (This is the answer to what you ask me)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHZTg9DBwIQ
@Randomplayer You have to make it the successor to this challenge. This is done using the cockpit provided in this post. Take a look how to here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqA0l2X3INo
This expression incorporates the rate of change of the pitch angle, which can make the control more responsive and dynamic, especially during fast or sharp pitch maneuvers. The G-force limiting function using smooth and clamp01 still works with this expression, so the G-limit is retained.
However, the reason the simpler expression without the PitchRate term is usually recommended:
is that it tends to produce more stable and predictable control behavior. The inclusion of PitchRate adds a reactive component which can make the behavior more twitchy or harder to control for some users or aircraft designs.
If you want to experiment, you can try using the version that includes PitchRate, but consider tuning the coefficient (currently 0.01) to balance sensitivity and smoothness based on your aircraft and flying style.
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
@CaptainNoble How did you get Simpleplanes' AI to start your plane's engines? When I tested your plane against mine, your plane crashed without starting the engines every time...
I respect the outcome of the challenge, but the result seems strange to me. I did a lot of testing...
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9uqBCu/ASP-1-Hailfire
Thanks for sharing. I have based on your model to redesign its fuselage. I hope you can take advantage of it and learn improvements for your future builds. Good luck ;-)
@owenliu ok this is the problem you must use other versión of modtools. I Will Yale a look the exact versión and share with you. No problem. When i regret to home, answer your question
@RamboJutter Although the plane exceeds the number of parts, there is no doubt that the design is from the indicated period. on the other hand, it seems that it meets the criteria of speed and limit of g-forces. It is also one of the most voted in the challenge. It is a well-worked plane and in principle I think it can take on the challenge. Anyway, I have to try it calmly.
@Tully2001 You can take a look at the videos ... Your plane has been amazing.
+1https://youtu.be/2geqgq8FkCQ
https://youtu.be/mpRzdWG4L1g
https://youtu.be/54KVoq0_pAw
@AudioDud3 It was difficult this tournament in the Indy Race ...
+1@RAF1 Thank you friend!
+1@JoddyFubuki788 on my phone works perfectly ...
+1@PlanesWorkShopUSER5 @JoddyFubuki788 Thanks!!!
+1Excellent plane! I like your works! Keep it up!
+1@Dimkal Hi! I´m from Spain. I design this Hellenic Air Force F-16 because the roundels insignias could be Portugal, Turkey and Greece. I like Greece much more ;-) i hope you like it! i will make a Greek F-4 Phantom II ;-)
+1Thanks! @General360 @EternalDarkness This plane reproduce real airbrakes of pakfa and rotated vertical wings. It takes me several time. Enjoy it!
+1@CallSignLancer
Use this tools mods...
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Mods/View/483588/Fine-Tuner
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Mods/View/870822/Upload-with-Screenshots
https://www.simpleplanes.com/Mods/View/524146/Overload
And take a look these videos...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ydwj2PVW90
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLyqjNYJT0s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__MQiQvYv5E
And this one... (This is the answer to what you ask me)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHZTg9DBwIQ
@MajorMapleLeaf If there is a marginal difference of less than 20 parts, I will try not to be too strict.
@bennyhhy Yes, of course, go ahead, go for it.
Incredible design! Congrats!!
Impresive! You Win!! :-D
@Randomplayer You have to make it the successor to this challenge. This is done using the cockpit provided in this post. Take a look how to here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqA0l2X3INo
@Matuoka443
Yes, it is possible to use your expression that includes the PitchRate term:
clamp(Pitch - PitchRate * 0.01 + Trim/2 * smooth(clamp01(GForce < 8), 0.5), -1, 1)
This expression incorporates the rate of change of the pitch angle, which can make the control more responsive and dynamic, especially during fast or sharp pitch maneuvers. The G-force limiting function using smooth and clamp01 still works with this expression, so the G-limit is retained.
However, the reason the simpler expression without the PitchRate term is usually recommended:
clamp(Pitch + Trim/2 * smooth(clamp01(GForce < 8), 0.5), -1, 1)
is that it tends to produce more stable and predictable control behavior. The inclusion of PitchRate adds a reactive component which can make the behavior more twitchy or harder to control for some users or aircraft designs.
If you want to experiment, you can try using the version that includes PitchRate, but consider tuning the coefficient (currently 0.01) to balance sensitivity and smoothness based on your aircraft and flying style.
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
Here is the link to join: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4Dhia0/CHALLENGE-50s-JET-DOGFIGHT
Thanks in advance for participating!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
Here is the link to join: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4Dhia0/CHALLENGE-50s-JET-DOGFIGHT
Thanks in advance for participating!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
Here is the link to join: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4Dhia0/CHALLENGE-50s-JET-DOGFIGHT
Thanks in advance for participating!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
Here is the link to join: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4Dhia0/CHALLENGE-50s-JET-DOGFIGHT
Thanks in advance for participating!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
Here is the link to join: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4Dhia0/CHALLENGE-50s-JET-DOGFIGHT
Thanks in advance for participating!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
Here is the link to join: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4Dhia0/CHALLENGE-50s-JET-DOGFIGHT
Thanks in advance for participating!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
Here is the link to join: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4Dhia0/CHALLENGE-50s-JET-DOGFIGHT
Thanks in advance for participating!
It would be a pleasure to have your plane in the next challenge I prepared. I would love to see your plane flying. Get ready, it’s a great opportunity!
Here is the link to join: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/4Dhia0/CHALLENGE-50s-JET-DOGFIGHT
Thanks in advance for participating!
@WinsWings Finally, I have it ready ;-) 50s Jet Dogfight
@CaptainNoble I invite you to participate in the challenge I'm preparing soon 😉
@CaptainNoble How did you get Simpleplanes' AI to start your plane's engines? When I tested your plane against mine, your plane crashed without starting the engines every time...
I respect the outcome of the challenge, but the result seems strange to me. I did a lot of testing...
@DCSplanepro12 https://www.simpleplanes.com/Forums/View/1902384
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/9uqBCu/ASP-1-Hailfire
Thanks for sharing. I have based on your model to redesign its fuselage. I hope you can take advantage of it and learn improvements for your future builds. Good luck ;-)
@Liquidfox01 i´m developing an upgrade for this plane ;-)
@Liquidfox01 is centered but due to resize generate this effect
@Liquidfox01 sorry what props?
@Llamma AG4 Master Arms
Very nice concept! Great job!
@AWESOMENESS360 thank you very much!! At least I reach the rank.
Gracias a todos! Thank you very much! 👍👍👍👍
Saeta SA-200
@tucan Thank you!
Sorry i have a question... instruments mod are allowed? thanks
@owenliu Wow! Great! Thanks for share the problem
Available https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/DhMFK7/Fiat-CR-78-Fuciliere
@BOXboy yes no problem. I thank you tour answer. Will be other opportunities. Thanks!
@owenliu I think it is better to ask someone from Jundroo, the truth is that I do not know how to solve that problem... Sorry
@owenliu I think is problem of Modtools... mmm or GUIClips... sorry but i dont´t remember what is GUICLIps. Take a look about GUIclips error... mmmm
Wow very nice
@owenliu I have Unity 2018.3.8f1 (64bit) and work perfectly, and this version of Modtools
@owenliu ok this is the problem you must use other versión of modtools. I Will Yale a look the exact versión and share with you. No problem. When i regret to home, answer your question
@owenliu probably Will be the versión of Unity or modtool.. what versión is It?
@RamboJutter Although the plane exceeds the number of parts, there is no doubt that the design is from the indicated period. on the other hand, it seems that it meets the criteria of speed and limit of g-forces. It is also one of the most voted in the challenge. It is a well-worked plane and in principle I think it can take on the challenge. Anyway, I have to try it calmly.
Nice!
@DarDragon Thank you very much! this planes is very nice!