@BogdanX I might, but currently there's an issue in SPVR which causes planes with certain control methods to not work properly, so I think I'll wait a bit until they've been fixed
Most forums I've been on have a short set of guidelines at the bottom of the page when creating a forum, and some even have them when making a comment.
I think all they did for traction was put chanes on one set wheels and attach the spare tyres to the other set. Other than that the tyres were completely bald. (Why they thought bald tyres would work in thicc, soft, slippery snow, I have no idea
Pretty cool though! :)
Presentation is literally the difference between 15 upvotes and 100. If the thumbnail for your vehicle is an unnaturally metallic glossy pink car in front of a black background in the shade, very few people are gonna click on it and therefore very few people are gonna upvote it. But if you change the thumbnail to a car in a semi-gloss salmon colour and white, with detailed floral patterns for a smaller detail, and give it interesting lighting that makes details pop out and attract the eye, way more people are gonna click on it and you'll get significantly more upvotes.
.
On YouTube, I constantly see people complaining that the algorithm hates them. But really what it is is their thumbnails are complete garbage and the names of their videos are stupidly obvious clickbait or uninteresting. They don't get views because people don't click on them, regardless of the amount of work they put into them.
@XjayIndustrys No because hinge rotators can only move in one axis. Every joint in this car's suspension must move in 3 axes, and the only way to do that in SP currently is to use 2 hinge rotators and a small rotator all connected to each other in the same place. This is currently causing the suspension to be extremely heavy and floppy and is the reason this car is at 2x normal scale.
@XjayIndustrys If 1.11 comes out with ball joints, my plan is to make one with lifted suspension and offroad wheels, offroad bumpers, a rooftop tent, a snorkel and camping stuff in the back. :)
Never make an upload schedule. Infact, if you leave a longer gap between uploads, you actually tend to get more upvotes on your crafts.
+2Love the "lost in luna" design! Although I was kinda hoping for an Aircraft 3- view design aswell
+2Hey! That's not what you're meant to do!
+2You're supposed to shine high power lasers into your friend's eyes all night!
Hi back, I'm @Dad!
+2I should make one of these
+2Writing in Russian is easy. You just put a gazillion question marks in a row with a bunch of random spaces scattered through them and bam. Russian! 🇷🇺
+2@BogdanX I might, but currently there's an issue in SPVR which causes planes with certain control methods to not work properly, so I think I'll wait a bit until they've been fixed
+2@GrentonAircraftCo
+21. It'll cost $9.99
2. yes
3. It has no designer, but SPVR is also integrated into the base game
Here's a tip: for a good camera height above the seat, make your camera about 0.75 to 0.8 metres above the base.
+2Is this really a 109 though? Lol
+2Looks cool af ngl
[Insert cocky statement about winning]
+2Because of how colours work in SP, you can't. You've just gotta think about how to integrate them before hand.
+2@117Destroyerz If they made that I'd buy 100 of them
+2As for the map though, it would be nice if it were more rugged
+2Also the crater is way oversized lol
@SmallSlav1061og VR has to be one of the tags too, but other than that it's all g
+2Yeah it's been like this for ages.
+2It would be nice if the lines were a tad thinner but the same width no matter where you're viewing them from
If you could make this actually type out a label using funky trees, that would be insane
+2@CC1010 The old sea plane sucked af. It barely functioned and barely took off
+2Why unlisted :(
+2WOW
+2YES we need this!
+2Is that connected to they tyre or the rim?
+2nO oNe cAreS
+2The beta is out already
+2Okay, this is cool :D
+21 is probably the most realistic for a canopy shape like that
+2@PlaneFlightX YES
+2Maybe "What we used to have to do in the olden days before semi hollow fuselages were invented"
That looks sick though!
+2@CC1010 Never played it until a week ago and now it's my favourite game lol
+2Still wondering why I hadn't played it earlier lol
Hi still alive, I'm @Dad!
+2Hi bored I'm @Dad!
+2And also fluffy boi
Most forums I've been on have a short set of guidelines at the bottom of the page when creating a forum, and some even have them when making a comment.
Kinda weird SP doesn't have any of that...
+2I think all they did for traction was put chanes on one set wheels and attach the spare tyres to the other set. Other than that the tyres were completely bald. (Why they thought bald tyres would work in thicc, soft, slippery snow, I have no idea
+2Pretty cool though! :)
It's 90 fps for me
+2Mentalise the mechanism and think about why some things are the way they are and if things have to be certain lengths and why,
+21998-2021, that seems concerning
+2Small RC plane gathering, 1932, colourised
+2They're all Piper Cubs clearly
+2@RealChenxiang Impossible! XD
+2@Leota XDD
+2If you add ball joints I might be able to make a fully detailed version of my Scout Weka with less than 1000 parts now lmao
+2Presentation is literally the difference between 15 upvotes and 100. If the thumbnail for your vehicle is an unnaturally metallic glossy pink car in front of a black background in the shade, very few people are gonna click on it and therefore very few people are gonna upvote it. But if you change the thumbnail to a car in a semi-gloss salmon colour and white, with detailed floral patterns for a smaller detail, and give it interesting lighting that makes details pop out and attract the eye, way more people are gonna click on it and you'll get significantly more upvotes.
+2.
On YouTube, I constantly see people complaining that the algorithm hates them. But really what it is is their thumbnails are complete garbage and the names of their videos are stupidly obvious clickbait or uninteresting. They don't get views because people don't click on them, regardless of the amount of work they put into them.
@XjayIndustrys No because hinge rotators can only move in one axis. Every joint in this car's suspension must move in 3 axes, and the only way to do that in SP currently is to use 2 hinge rotators and a small rotator all connected to each other in the same place. This is currently causing the suspension to be extremely heavy and floppy and is the reason this car is at 2x normal scale.
+2@XjayIndustrys If 1.11 comes out with ball joints, my plan is to make one with lifted suspension and offroad wheels, offroad bumpers, a rooftop tent, a snorkel and camping stuff in the back. :)
+2AN-2, C-46 and update my Moray
+2@AWESOMENESS360 @PapaKernels @Parehare Thanks!
+2The name 😂
+2Unfortunately though, you're gonna have to change the name because curse words aren't allowed on this site
Bush flying is the best
+2How do you access your own crafts or a particular user's crafts on the website?
+2beans
+2