@ZeroWithSlashedO I'm assuming that this person wants their props to idle. That first equation would mean that throttle is only 0.05 when your throttle is at 0, so if you have your throttle at 0.001 say, then the throttle will go down to 0.001, which isn't how engine idling works. That next equation would mean that at 95% throttle, the engine will be at 100% power, which isn't perfect either.
Last night I had a dream that I was racing down a beach in a dakar rally SUV and I came second, then we all headed out towed by a C-17 with trailers attached and I was watching from a mansion next to the airport where I got my trophy, and 10 seconds after it took off I realised that trailers aren't ment to work like this, and all the trailers decoupled and all the cars and the people in them fell into the ocean. Idk what to make of this.
Oh, in 3 years? You might have heard of the German Corsair, alos SPVR came out, there's better parts and glass and fuselage cutting to make building cockpits easier, um... yeah
@Ryunekoo Nah. If you want that, you might aswell just play SR2. Also Droo has nowhere near enough detail to be entertaining for an aircraft and car based game. I would rather have something smaller and hand made.
The reason you're still not horny looking at this despite its thy gap the width of the grand canyon and tiddies the size of footballs is, you've made them disproprtionate and your charicter just looks deformed. Not to mention your thighs are literally widwr than they are... human forward-back ways (whatever that dimension is called lmao). If you make them more human shaped, you might find them better looking.
I am proud of you and your decision to go ahead with Vincent's suggestion and step down from your position.
Sometimes it can be hard to accept that decreasing your position to one of lower significance can be the right thing to do, yet here you are, selflessly resigning, while still maintaining pride and dignity. Doing what is correct for the course of humanity for years to come. I salute you brother. 🫡
@PlaneFlightX @Mustang51 I think one of the main contributors to your frame rate dropping is the number of polygons the craft has. Even if you murged all that into "1 part" it's still gonna have a significantly lower frame rate because it's a more detailed model.
.
Edit: I just remembered that another thing SP renders is the location and rotation of every individual part, so yeah, if you murged them into 1 part I think it might improve performance a bit... maybe not as much as you guys expect though.
SP actually kinda does this already. It beaks the plane up into sections between rotators, detaches, wings, and all parts that rotate or have wiggly connections. Each section is basically grouped together into one piece of physics, which is why when you make a palne but don't have any moving parts or wings on it, it doesn't rotate or anything when you start on a final approach location.
@FlyingPatriot Uhhhummfh "death if innocent people" isn't at all, uh, politics.
The definition of politics is "the activities associated with the governance of a country or area, especially the debate between parties having power."
The reason political discussions aren't allowed is because many people feel very strongly about certain sides of debates and it often leads to heated arguments.
The earthquake in Turkey doesn't have anything to do with the government amd it doesn't even hve any debate in it. It's literally just that people died in an earthquake. I have no clue how something on your brain went from earthquake to politics...
@ShinyGemsBro What version of SP are you on? I know there's one experimental version where they stopped the saving step thing to see of it affects performance back in one of the updates.
What were you doing with the soy sauce in your bed g
+4Hi leaving!
+5I don't know who you are and also you never left
Guys I'm leaving
+4ok
ok
@Graingy Ohhhhhh lol okay lol
@Graingy oh XD
Anyway, everyone should have fine tuner since it's in the game now. Also you can nudge using the transform part tool anyway.
@Graingy No fine tuner?
Okay
@ZeroWithSlashedO I'm assuming that this person wants their props to idle. That first equation would mean that throttle is only 0.05 when your throttle is at 0, so if you have your throttle at 0.001 say, then the throttle will go down to 0.001, which isn't how engine idling works. That next equation would mean that at 95% throttle, the engine will be at 100% power, which isn't perfect either.
@Farewellntchii That would set throttle to 100% when you set the throttle above 0.05
+10.95 * Throttle + 0.05Dude be doin 3G around the corners like it's nothin
+1Last night I had a dream that I was racing down a beach in a dakar rally SUV and I came second, then we all headed out towed by a C-17 with trailers attached and I was watching from a mansion next to the airport where I got my trophy, and 10 seconds after it took off I realised that trailers aren't ment to work like this, and all the trailers decoupled and all the cars and the people in them fell into the ocean. Idk what to make of this.
+4@TheFlightGuySP If you can run an AI plane on your phone, you can play MP with your friends.
+2Jundroo is missing a HUGE opportunity by not adding MP to SP. Honestly.
+2But yeah it does cost money to run MP servers.
on your favourite rocket work ship
+1Oh crap, I've just realised that we've been misreading the title of this game the whole time! It's actually SimpleHouses!
Wait. Is this a feelings forum?
+3Oh, in 3 years? You might have heard of the German Corsair, alos SPVR came out, there's better parts and glass and fuselage cutting to make building cockpits easier, um... yeah
+4The player base has been strong, but nothing has happened in ages tbh.
+3@Ryunekoo Nah. If you want that, you might aswell just play SR2. Also Droo has nowhere near enough detail to be entertaining for an aircraft and car based game. I would rather have something smaller and hand made.
@MonarquistaDeAlcantara Practice, patience and thinking about it pretty much
Hey moderators can we please get a furry and animorphic tag for aeroplanes plz kthxbye
Why did you tag 9 people on a forum that has literally no purpose except announce this is your first forum?
+10from my experience it doesn't work :/
+3The sleeping bag liner looks like a pretty useful pat for some details :D
+1@ThatRandomCouchPotato When your uploading, there's a button that says publicity and "public". Click that so it says unlisted.
The reason you're still not horny looking at this despite its thy gap the width of the grand canyon and tiddies the size of footballs is, you've made them disproprtionate and your charicter just looks deformed. Not to mention your thighs are literally widwr than they are... human forward-back ways (whatever that dimension is called lmao). If you make them more human shaped, you might find them better looking.
+1I am proud of you and your decision to go ahead with Vincent's suggestion and step down from your position.
+10Sometimes it can be hard to accept that decreasing your position to one of lower significance can be the right thing to do, yet here you are, selflessly resigning, while still maintaining pride and dignity. Doing what is correct for the course of humanity for years to come. I salute you brother. 🫡
Yep! Congrats!
ohghey
@PlaneFlightX @Mustang51 I think one of the main contributors to your frame rate dropping is the number of polygons the craft has. Even if you murged all that into "1 part" it's still gonna have a significantly lower frame rate because it's a more detailed model.
+1.
Edit: I just remembered that another thing SP renders is the location and rotation of every individual part, so yeah, if you murged them into 1 part I think it might improve performance a bit... maybe not as much as you guys expect though.
SP actually kinda does this already. It beaks the plane up into sections between rotators, detaches, wings, and all parts that rotate or have wiggly connections. Each section is basically grouped together into one piece of physics, which is why when you make a palne but don't have any moving parts or wings on it, it doesn't rotate or anything when you start on a final approach location.
+4@Farewellntchii Shadowbanning isn't a thing here. You're either banned or you're not
band
+1Hands off snakey!
+3Decrease horsepower or increase grip. Your wheels are just skidding at full speed and they can't get enough grip with all that power you've given it.
@FlyingPatriot Uhhhummfh "death if innocent people" isn't at all, uh, politics.
+1The definition of politics is "the activities associated with the governance of a country or area, especially the debate between parties having power."
The reason political discussions aren't allowed is because many people feel very strongly about certain sides of debates and it often leads to heated arguments.
The earthquake in Turkey doesn't have anything to do with the government amd it doesn't even hve any debate in it. It's literally just that people died in an earthquake. I have no clue how something on your brain went from earthquake to politics...
If you have a device that's powerful enough to run it, my Miro has one behind the dashboard scaled down. You can steal that if you want :)
Yeah you make a winch that goes in and out when you're over a certain AoA and over a certain TAS.
@FlyingPatriot how is this in any way political
+3@EverettStormy Thanks :)
This looks cool! Next step is to build the rest of the body :)
+1@Tookan No you can still do that if you want lol. There's no such things as too much saving :)
+1@Gooooose bruh why tho gee
Use a camera
@ShinyGemsBro What version of SP are you on? I know there's one experimental version where they stopped the saving step thing to see of it affects performance back in one of the updates.
Don't the blueprints follow the cockpit?
@Nerfaddict Holy damn. Probably would have been better to just modify it a bit lol