I will try to give an answer in all of your examples with my limited english skills so please be patient with me.
Tu4 vs B29 partially correct. What the SU did exactly was to make exact copies of the one b29 they got their hands on and not just repaint a bunch of stolen b29s.
Mig31 vs F-15
First off the mig31 is an interceptor while the f15 is a fighter (totally different roles and so different designs to fulfill their asigned roles)
F-15vs Su-27
Those 2 are completely different i don't get how you concluded they are related.
As for the su 57 looking similar with the f22 is more of how stealth works. To conclude, many aircraft may share similarities but thats
More because of the laws of physics tjan because of "lazy" engineering. Hope my english was understandable.
Looks amazing but it has too many drag points. I suggest setting calculate drag to false in the xml editor for the details so that people with potato devices can run it and setting dragscale to 0 on the biggest parts in order to reduce the drag to increase its glide ratio
@ChiChiWerx very interesting thank you. i will maybe try to simulate the "bending" you mentioned with some hinge rotators but its not my main priority right now i just added a detacher to each wing. currently i am trying to get the weight,dimensions,drag right
despite some imperfections with the detailing (the red line thing on the wings is sticking out of the wingtip,the gear wells are kinda messy) and the flight behaviou(very high acceleration, high fuel consumption etc) it looks nice and simple. reminds me a bit of bogdanx's style.
@L3dg3ndary i will release this for your challenge maybe tomorow or in 2 days from now is that ok?
@LGNDRY my entry will be ready in about 2 days is that ok?
@BagelPlane yasen
@LGNDRY ok thanks
Hello is it possible to postpone the deadline by a few days please? Seems like my mirage needs a bit of more work
You are a livery master
@Viper3000ad
@KnightOfRen i am not hating on what you say and i am sorry if you took my comment that way. My goal was to crrect you and not to insult you.
I will try to give an answer in all of your examples with my limited english skills so please be patient with me.
+3Tu4 vs B29 partially correct. What the SU did exactly was to make exact copies of the one b29 they got their hands on and not just repaint a bunch of stolen b29s.
Mig31 vs F-15
First off the mig31 is an interceptor while the f15 is a fighter (totally different roles and so different designs to fulfill their asigned roles)
F-15vs Su-27
Those 2 are completely different i don't get how you concluded they are related.
As for the su 57 looking similar with the f22 is more of how stealth works. To conclude, many aircraft may share similarities but thats
More because of the laws of physics tjan because of "lazy" engineering. Hope my english was understandable.
the supreme leader is dead
+2The pictures you took dont serve it justice. Nice work
+1Ok
Looks amazing but it has too many drag points. I suggest setting calculate drag to false in the xml editor for the details so that people with potato devices can run it and setting dragscale to 0 on the biggest parts in order to reduce the drag to increase its glide ratio
+2Very nice. Too bad it only has 4 upvotes i think you uploaded it too late
+1saddly the best way to learn comes from practise so i suggest you do it by yourself
current part count is 274
@Tomhu its alright with a little more practise you will be able to build one that surpasses mine just dont rush things
+2@ItzP1N3APPLZ with sheer patience
@ChiChiWerx very interesting thank you. i will maybe try to simulate the "bending" you mentioned with some hinge rotators but its not my main priority right now i just added a detacher to each wing. currently i am trying to get the weight,dimensions,drag right
@Eiro i guess with patience
@ItzP1N3APPLZ what do you mean?
despite some imperfections with the detailing (the red line thing on the wings is sticking out of the wingtip,the gear wells are kinda messy) and the flight behaviou(very high acceleration, high fuel consumption etc) it looks nice and simple. reminds me a bit of bogdanx's style.
@Dimkal
@PotatoWasTaken alright i will tag you in the final post :)
My only critisism is that the nose looks kinda rough
sorry for re-uploading the post i wanted to make some corrections to the text
ah yes the mog-22
Looks great but flies funny :/
@Bobofboblandia cool
+1@Bobofboblandia No idea but you can look it up on the internet. Also since you mentioned a tie bomber i think i know what my next build is gonna be
+1@Bobofboblandia well the internet proves you wrong
+1@Bobofboblandia no, why should it?
+1Stop upvoting this thing its already overrated
@KrazyKarl cool
This is a moskva but taller
This is what i call a worthy successor
+2The swedish airforce roundel sticks out a bit too much. I think you should panel it
Finally a worthy successor
+1my only complaint is the non functioning creep motors but thats just a tiny detail
(also the "escape hatch" is actually called escape capsule)
I demand an update on the star destroyer
45920 drag points rip
I find your lack of weathering disturbing
Captain i think its the Kanovalov
+1This is pretty cool
Thumbnail does not do it justice
This gave me a PTSD attack
+1Why are they called turbolasers when theres no air in space?
@Majestic77 i think you accidentally tagged me
Lego city is a dysfunctional city
+2@jamesPLANESii 4 legs good 2 legs better