@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat
It...
Is.
And it's pretty simple.
For example, if you want a service ceiling of 20.000m, you need to put exactly what @Madness said in the engine's input, which is:
Altitude>20.000 ? 0 : Throttle
@Bryan5
YESSSSS
Edit:
Wait, when you say as a platform only... Do you mean it's exclusive to that aircraft or the aircraft is just for a show (doesn't move at all), and it carries that custom missile?
@X99STRIKER
wait no-
what I had in my head was make a simple livery for my simple MiG or a simple F-104G, so when I say "german fulcrum" or "german starfighter", people would think it's a meme, but it's an actual effort
Nice! Keep going!
Note:
The custom missiles are a bit too bland, I suggest remodeling 2 of them. Don't get rid of the one on the left. That actually looks good.
If you want to look for a russian weapon, you can look into my profile and find a Missile pack. You can find the R-73 and yoink it.
Customize it however you want, as long as it suits you.
Also yes, advertisement.
Reminder that the MiG-29 is also able to take off from rough airstrips.
It's actually sorta simple
If you want it to move horizontally, use: <pos={input}>
If you want it to move vertically, use: <voffset={input}>
If you want it to be able to move diagonally, you put em both.
If you want it to be able to rotate, use: <rotate={input}>
Note that you cannot use 2 operators at the same bracket, for example: LandingGear ? Pitch ? PitchRate/70 : 0 : 0 will not work
Honestly, it's not hard to do besides just going back and fourth so I kinda disagree.
I think the only 2 weapons I want them to add is the Laser Guided Bomb and a Fox-2.
Kinda neutral about this one, cuz Idk how to feel about that. Because on one hand, I kinda agree, but on the other hand, it's an unguided bomb. Why need a chute for a dumb bomb?
Honestly, I agree with this one. There's only 4 types of engines (prop, turbojet, turbofan, and helicopter blade) in SP and I think we need more.
I've read the comment below, sad. I kinda agree, but sad. Honestly, Walv!s made a good point on maps. There's these scattered islands that have no purpose whatsoever, and it is a waste. They could just have airstrips, bases, helipads, or naval base in them so it became a lot more interesting.
That honestly is a good suggestion, but in return it makes you lag. Seriously, if you play on Sandbox and play with a high part count, and spawn an aircraft with a low part count, it gets pretty laggy (at least in low end devices). If you enter the Dogfight mode and play with the same aircrafts, it's gonna be less laggy.
It's already in the game though? I mean reverse thrust is here.
As I said in the previous post, do the ALWF program I requested.
In case you missed it, here are the requirements:
- Lightweight
- Advanced Avionics (some sort of advanced controls in the cockpit, Idk)
- Advanced Weaponry
- Thrust Vectoring Engine
- Stealth (optional)
I mean, not your fault.
People like those guys have trained to make advanced stuff for months, while we're here just tryna have fun. And don't get me wrong, they also tryna have fun, that's why they do it. Don't say "I just can't compete with them" with a dissapointed tone, or else you will never do! I'd say try to improvise like them. Pushing the limit barrier is sometimes importanr in our life.
Make some G e n e r a l D y n a m i c s / L o c k h e e d M a r t i n F - 1 6 C B l o c k 5 0 F i g h t i n g F a l c o n / V i p e r 4 t h G e n e r a t i o n S i n g l e E n g i n e M u l t i r o l e A i r c r a f t
@FeatherWing
so what?
no RWR on an aircraft is a death wish.
Besides, why bring up Radar to an evasive maneuver?
While cranking up to the gimbal limit is effective, you can also go fully defensive with crank, it doesn't have to involve Radar.
@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat
+1It...
Is.
And it's pretty simple.
For example, if you want a service ceiling of 20.000m, you need to put exactly what @Madness said in the engine's input, which is:
Altitude>20.000 ? 0 : Throttle
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
+1It is.
Although, the destruction doesn't seem to be disastrous.
@GorillaGuerrilla
+1yah
this one's in the meantime.
see what my thoughts are about the aircraft, and maybe you can improve it.
@Bryan5
+1YESSSSS
Edit:
Wait, when you say as a platform only... Do you mean it's exclusive to that aircraft or the aircraft is just for a show (doesn't move at all), and it carries that custom missile?
dududududuududude
+1can I also include the Aircraft?
A Su-33, I see!
+1Beautiful.
Cool.
+1@X99STRIKER
+1wait no-
what I had in my head was make a simple livery for my simple MiG or a simple F-104G, so when I say "german fulcrum" or "german starfighter", people would think it's a meme, but it's an actual effort
@X99STRIKER
+1here, lemme help you
haha some revive bullshittery go brr
it didn't work lmao
god, this was godly.
+1Imma go look at the rest of the posts I haven't read now.
like say:
+1someone said to me "you have done zero progress", it would be pretty unfun.
Fr though
+1making fun of usernames is kinda unfun to the user
God.
+1This was a godly conversation.
Sounds like a nice entry. Looking forward to testing it!
+1good kill, ya'll splashed the competition lmao.
+1the definition of extreme LERX
+1beri gud
Nice! Keep going!
+1Note:
The custom missiles are a bit too bland, I suggest remodeling 2 of them. Don't get rid of the one on the left. That actually looks good.
If you want to look for a russian weapon, you can look into my profile and find a Missile pack. You can find the R-73 and yoink it.
Customize it however you want, as long as it suits you.
Also yes, advertisement.
Reminder that the MiG-29 is also able to take off from rough airstrips.
It's actually sorta simple
+1If you want it to move horizontally, use: <pos={input}>
If you want it to move vertically, use: <voffset={input}>
If you want it to be able to move diagonally, you put em both.
If you want it to be able to rotate, use: <rotate={input}>
Note that you cannot use 2 operators at the same bracket, for example: LandingGear ? Pitch ? PitchRate/70 : 0 : 0 will not work
Ooooh, interesting! I'm in!
+1Question:
Does 2 missiles in one craft counts as one?
@Bellcat
+1Well,
Do you see what device am I making my planes?
@SkyJayTheFirst
+1Mainly because I haven't tried it.
Well, there goes the 4 points. Goodbye.
+1@CarrotSlicingCat
+1yeah lmao
ayyyyyyyyyyyy
+1congrats
pebelou
+1bootiful
ok
+1cool
@CarrotSlicingCat
+1No, like I said, so many people do it. If players do it, then it's probably allowed.
I mean
+1So many people do it, so why not?
I personally like to write it down myself, but alot of people go with the simple and fast option.
@Airbusfan12345
+1ok lmao
frog
+1- Honestly, it's not hard to do besides just going back and fourth so I kinda disagree.
- I think the only 2 weapons I want them to add is the Laser Guided Bomb and a Fox-2.
- Kinda neutral about this one, cuz Idk how to feel about that. Because on one hand, I kinda agree, but on the other hand, it's an unguided bomb. Why need a chute for a dumb bomb?
- Honestly, I agree with this one. There's only 4 types of engines (prop, turbojet, turbofan, and helicopter blade) in SP and I think we need more.
- I've read the comment below, sad. I kinda agree, but sad. Honestly, Walv!s made a good point on maps. There's these scattered islands that have no purpose whatsoever, and it is a waste. They could just have airstrips, bases, helipads, or naval base in them so it became a lot more interesting.
- That honestly is a good suggestion, but in return it makes you lag. Seriously, if you play on Sandbox and play with a high part count, and spawn an aircraft with a low part count, it gets pretty laggy (at least in low end devices). If you enter the Dogfight mode and play with the same aircrafts, it's gonna be less laggy.
- It's already in the game though? I mean reverse thrust is here.
- Not possible. For now.
+1@Bryan5
+1the cobra stuff probably
@Bryan5
+1Maybe.
Or I'll just do both with what I want to do.
@SheriffHackdogMCPE
+1oh ok
guess I'm blind
tf do you want????
+1@ReinMcDeer
+1I'll try later, thank you.
Also, I'm pretty sure I put main wings at semi-symmetric, but I guess I didn't?
@X99STRIKER
+1sort of.
As I said in the previous post, do the ALWF program I requested.
+1In case you missed it, here are the requirements:
- Lightweight
- Advanced Avionics (some sort of advanced controls in the cockpit, Idk)
- Advanced Weaponry
- Thrust Vectoring Engine
- Stealth (optional)
I mean, not your fault.
+1People like those guys have trained to make advanced stuff for months, while we're here just tryna have fun. And don't get me wrong, they also tryna have fun, that's why they do it. Don't say "I just can't compete with them" with a dissapointed tone, or else you will never do! I'd say try to improvise like them. Pushing the limit barrier is sometimes importanr in our life.
Make some G e n e r a l D y n a m i c s / L o c k h e e d M a r t i n F - 1 6 C B l o c k 5 0 F i g h t i n g F a l c o n / V i p e r 4 t h G e n e r a t i o n S i n g l e E n g i n e M u l t i r o l e A i r c r a f t
+1F/A-18F
+1beri gud
Tag me
Can we just pretty much agree that this is the winner?
+1F-16 frames are pretty easy to create, I agree.
+1@ReinMcDeer
+1more like, the gbu bus
@GriseoCattus
+1why?
You know what, fine.
+11.472 seconds. 90° 50% Speed. There. You happy now?
If you're still not happy, 50% Speed is 80°/second.
As far as I know, no.
+1Although you can make it detonate before hitting. It's called proximityDetonationRange. Put "Min" or "Max" after the "Range"
@FeatherWing
+1so what?
no RWR on an aircraft is a death wish.
Besides, why bring up Radar to an evasive maneuver?
While cranking up to the gimbal limit is effective, you can also go fully defensive with crank, it doesn't have to involve Radar.
@Krikkit42
+1Use ortographic view and add a blueprint.
But instead of adding blueprint, add your screenshot of the plane in-game.
@FeatherWing
+1I mean, there's RWR.