64.3k ZeroWithSlashedO Comments

  • Challenge results is finally out! 3.1 years ago

    @GorillaGuerrilla @GriseoCattus
    Alright, cool.

    +1
  • Challenge results is finally out! 3.1 years ago

    @GorillaGuerrilla
    @GriseoCattus
    You both completely destroyed the competition. You feel happy?

    +1
  • F-16C Update and Su-27S Teaser 3.1 years ago

    @ReinMcDeer
    Huh. I guess I need to read more.

    +1
  • F-22 Raptor 3.1 years ago

    I don't even recall the rules allowing for replicas
    Even if it did, this is a blatant repost with a cockpit redesign. Legally, this wouldn't be removed. But at this point it's just bullshit.

    +1
  • Guess the movie 3.1 years ago

    Revvin' up your engine, listen to her howlin' roar

    +1
  • F-16C Update and Su-27S Teaser 3.1 years ago

    Isn't the Су-27 unable to carry any other mid-long range missiles other than the Р-27Р/Т/ЕР/ЕТ to begin with? I don't recall reading the Су-27СК's specification and remembering it could hold the Р-77.

    +1
  • Should I or should I not? 3.1 years ago

    I mean... That's what emission does.

    +1
  • PAC/CAC JF-17 Thunder 3.1 years ago

    @WorstPlaneIEverMake
    It is a delta wing. Basically anything that resembles a triangular wing is a delta wing.

    +1
  • heli go CHCHCHCHCHC 3.1 years ago

    fortunate son intensifies

    +1
  • Sukhoi T-10-1 Flanker-A 3.1 years ago

    @Chickendude
    jam 2 banh
    baru bangun ya masih ngantuk

    +1
  • Help! 3.1 years ago

    @idontknow8b
    No.

    +1
  • Help! 3.1 years ago

    What you're making is the C, correct?
    If so, that's the carrier variant. And the carrier variant does not have the gun integrated into the fuselage.

    +1
  • Help! 3.1 years ago

    @idontknow8b
    I guess you didn't look closely enough.

    +1
  • Help! 3.1 years ago

    @idontknow8b
    I demand that to be changed, right now.

    +1
  • Help! 3.1 years ago

    I have a slight problem...
    Do you have it in the fuselage or below the fuselage on a different pod? Because if it's on the fuselage, I automatically dislike it since it's not where it's supposed to be.

    +1
  • Sukhoi T-10-1 Flanker-A 3.1 years ago

    All tag requests.

    +1
  • Sukhoi T-10-1 Flanker-A 3.1 years ago

    @XD69
    @xNotDumb

    +1
  • Sukhoi T-10-1 Flanker-A 3.1 years ago

    @Gro
    @KDnotSpy
    @Spitfirelad05

    +1
  • Sukhoi T-10-1 Flanker-A 3.1 years ago

    @Bryan5
    @HI
    @MrShenanigansSP

    +1
  • Sukhoi T-10-1 Flanker-A 3.1 years ago

    @Winterfield
    @Chickendude
    @Brayden1981

    +1
  • A bit problem 3.1 years ago

    Why ask us? We have nothing to do with that.

    +1
  • F/A-18F and F-15C Update 3.1 years ago

    A Су-27 remake?
    from what I can tell it's a Су-27, very cool

    +1
  • What is the maximum file limit for XML files when updating a build? 3.1 years ago

    not sure
    somebody needs to test that out

    +1
  • How to fire weapons in sequence? 3.1 years ago

    they do that
    you can't change it

    +1
  • choose 3.1 years ago

    Why not all of em, in order?

    +1
  • SimplePlanes-Meme 3.1 years ago

    Hoho, it's almost as if 2Papi2Chulo's F-14 has been forgotten.

    +1
  • SAT:Simpleplanes Assessment Test 3.1 years ago

    ah shite I got #3 wrong because I didn't read the question correctly
    I'm dumb sometimes

    after looking at #19
    ЧЕВО БЛЯТЬ
    I WAS SURE I PRESSED THE RIGHT ANSWER
    AAAAGH YOU LITTLE MISCLICK BASTARD

    +1
  • SAT:Simpleplanes Assessment Test 3.1 years ago

    aha
    fun stuff to do
    I will proceed to answer the quiz

    +1
  • 3,006 points! 3.1 years ago

    @KaiRaptorEagle4778
    Ракету?

    +1
  • 3,006 points! 3.1 years ago

    @KaiRaptorEagle4778
    First of all, no. I'm not russian.
    Second of all, well, have fun getting banned by mods because you're underaged, I remember someone having to experience it after all.

    +1
  • 3,006 points! 3.1 years ago

    @KaiRaptorEagle4778
    чево блять?
    I'm sorry, but you gotta leave the site for at least 4 years.

    +1
  • 3,006 points! 3.1 years ago

    @KDnotSpy
    OH GOD WHAT THE FUCK
    oh no
    the horror

    +1
  • Simple Planes Challenge [CLOSED] 3.1 years ago

    @MAHADI
    Aww, sad.

    +1
  • LO-51 lindworm 3.1 years ago

    Thumbnail looks like it came straight out of Ace Combat 3. And I love it.

    +1
  • 3,006 points! 3.1 years ago

    @KDnotSpy

    how do you know

    +1
  • 3,006 points! 3.1 years ago

    4k not gold
    5k gold
    also why do you talk like someone under 10

    +1
  • Simple Planes Challenge [CLOSED] 3.1 years ago

    Can I use custom pylons?

    +1
  • Fuel burn problem 3.1 years ago

    You know for a fact you can increase more fuel, yes?

    +1
  • I might have The second challenge is (General battle)? I might do it soon 3.1 years ago

    Honestly, I think we should make it a tournament for different divisions based on rank.
    Make it an actual competition so that way it's more fun to participate, rather than just "dominating the competition based on upvotes" kinda challenge, and honestly that kinda judgement system sucks.

    +1
  • F/A-18E -Maverick- V1.6 3.1 years ago

    YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    << Good morning aviators! >>
    << This is your captain speaking. >>

    +1
  • SP Combat Under Fire, A Tutorial. 3.1 years ago

    @Numbers2
    While yes, you got two points in a dogfighting, but what you have to know is that this is SP.
    Planes also affects the fight. Specifically on how they were built.

    +1
  • Did sodium chloride like leave? 3.1 years ago

    Check if their name is still in the users list. If yes, they're most likely banned. Similar to how Wii is currently experiencing.
    I think.

    +1
  • Bacon tastes good 3.1 years ago

    Haram.

    +1
  • MiG-28s are not quite F-5s 3.1 years ago

    You do know it's a reskin of the F-5, right?
    Oh and also, I don't think that's how "bleeding energy" works.

    +1
  • I'm making a 112m tall Church tower 3.1 years ago

    mad
    but very cool

    +1
  • Is it possible 3.1 years ago

    @xNotDumb
    yep
    + missiles
    yepyepyep

    +1
  • Is it possible 3.1 years ago

    @xNotDumb
    haha... Now try it realistically.

    +1
  • Piston actuated landing gear 3.1 years ago

    I'm sure there is. It just needs some floppy rotators... shocks... pistons... a small rotator for controlling the steer... and a wheel or two. Oh and, don't forget the fuselages.

    +1
  • Is it possible 3.1 years ago

    I mean... In both worlds, it is possible. There are still some countries operating the MiG-21. China included. Though China doesn't operate it, but it "operates" it. Confusing, I know.
    In SP, yeah. I'm sure it could. I mean it's not even "could" anymore, I'm sure someone out there's crazy enough to dogfight a Viper in a Fishbed.

    +1
  • Thanks everyone for 2000 points! 3.1 years ago

    big dreams my man
    updoot

    +1