@Sockdragger Well, transonic is generally in the region of one Mach, but I think we can take less, in the region of 800-1000 km/h (well, how much is that in miles per hour?)
@SleepyKitty Well… I don’t think there will be actual places. Honestly, it’s hard for me to give any specific rankings, I’ve mentioned before I don’t like doing that. But we could say there are, so to speak, “nominations,” and your plane is currently winning in one of them — the “screw you and your rules” category) (Not an accusation)
@SleepyKitty >_< okay… Let it be. As for your question, I will quote the post: "There won’t really be a formal scoring system, probably. Yeah, I know that sounds odd — but the idea here is just to give people a prompt to build something cool. That said, I’ll definitely highlight the entries I personally like the most and share my thoughts on each submission."
Well, about the awards... Idk, well, let's say 10-15 upvotes. We'll see when it happens.
А, ну и по поводу топлива, стоит ведь минимальная граница по нему, так что его может быть хоть больше, чем сам самолёт весит, главное чтобы не было за гранью разумного (типа, там, я не знаю, 750 миллиардов литров, при загруженном весе в две тонны и пустом в -700 млрд кг)
Интересно. В целом, так-то неплохо, только меня немного напрягает на таком самолёте пушка в 75 мм, ну это так, чисто мои придирки, как от любителя какого-никакого реализма. А так вполне себе хороший самолёт, и для поставленных задач я думаю подходит, особенно с его-то орудием, с ним можно и без бомб обойтись)
@BOSSentinel It's all about the single engine. Adding a second one increases the cost, especially in terms of maintenance, and often reduces the combat radius, as seen with the MiG-29 compared to single-engine aircraft of the same era. The goal here is to keep things lightweight, simple, and efficient.
Heh, I've been rewriting the weight requirement for a while now... well, I think it's okay this time, it seems like the upper limit for the maximum takeoff weight doesn't make sense. Although who cares, only one person downloaded it besides me.
@Ktoto14 I meant that your plane is a pretty good basis for something like a turboprop fighter. Sorry if anything came off wrong, I didn’t mean to offend.
@Sockdragger Well, transonic is generally in the region of one Mach, but I think we can take less, in the region of 800-1000 km/h (well, how much is that in miles per hour?)
+1Could this be a modification of my existing aircraft?
@SleepyKitty Well… I don’t think there will be actual places. Honestly, it’s hard for me to give any specific rankings, I’ve mentioned before I don’t like doing that. But we could say there are, so to speak, “nominations,” and your plane is currently winning in one of them — the “screw you and your rules” category) (Not an accusation)
@SleepyKitty ЪуЪ
@SleepyKitty yes
@SleepyKitty +
@SleepyKitty Cool👍 but seriously, let it be, the plane is not bad
@Mitterbin Great
+1@SleepyKitty >_< okay… Let it be. As for your question, I will quote the post: "There won’t really be a formal scoring system, probably. Yeah, I know that sounds odd — but the idea here is just to give people a prompt to build something cool. That said, I’ll definitely highlight the entries I personally like the most and share my thoughts on each submission."
Well, about the awards... Idk, well, let's say 10-15 upvotes. We'll see when it happens.
@Ktoto14 yes, of course
@BOSSentinel Yes, quite so.
@BOSSentinel Aah, about the number of entries... well, as many as you can build by the end of the deadline, that's how many there will be)
+1А, ну и по поводу топлива, стоит ведь минимальная граница по нему, так что его может быть хоть больше, чем сам самолёт весит, главное чтобы не было за гранью разумного (типа, там, я не знаю, 750 миллиардов литров, при загруженном весе в две тонны и пустом в -700 млрд кг)
@BOSSentinel Okay, let's have it. And let's have it with two engines, since it's something like a Su-25, but the engines will still be quite small.
Интересно. В целом, так-то неплохо, только меня немного напрягает на таком самолёте пушка в 75 мм, ну это так, чисто мои придирки, как от любителя какого-никакого реализма. А так вполне себе хороший самолёт, и для поставленных задач я думаю подходит, особенно с его-то орудием, с ним можно и без бомб обойтись)
@BOSSentinel It's all about the single engine. Adding a second one increases the cost, especially in terms of maintenance, and often reduces the combat radius, as seen with the MiG-29 compared to single-engine aircraft of the same era. The goal here is to keep things lightweight, simple, and efficient.
+1Heh, I've been rewriting the weight requirement for a while now... well, I think it's okay this time, it seems like the upper limit for the maximum takeoff weight doesn't make sense. Although who cares, only one person downloaded it besides me.
+1funny
@Ktoto14 премного благодарен, в скором времени попытаюсь исправить
@SleepyKitty Doesn't matter)
@SleepyKitty Excellent, wonderful
Стабилизация для неженок, настоящие гигачады всегда готовы к раскумару😈
@Ktoto14 Well, that's good)
@Ktoto14 I meant that your plane is a pretty good basis for something like a turboprop fighter. Sorry if anything came off wrong, I didn’t mean to offend.
I just now noticed that I didn't put a countermeasure dispensers…
Вот это нихуя себе, ебать модификации, ахуеть
Заебок, брадочег
Ъуъ
+1@SleepyKitty no, i mean author of targeting pod
@Mitterbin I posted it just to transfer it from one phone to another, and there are already 3 downloads and a comment, funny