Thanks for the feedback, the reason I removed the drag was to against bug. When I was making planes with normal fuselage, I found that the drag was somtimes calculated incorrectly when I mirror it and it created a torque of yaw. So I started to remove them all and add them manually after finnished. I thinking I'd better foucus on drag adding next time. @edensk
It’s been canceled unfortunately.
I did spent a very very long time studying the architecture and so many details confused me, and the parts count expected was going to reach 10000, so I have to give it up.@RAAF
The plane needs a low speed and a big attack angle to land on the carrier but it nearly stall and doesn’t have a good controlling with that speed. However, it’s still a impressive plane, good job!
Thanks for the votes!@JoddyFubuki788 @PointlessWhyshouldi
Thanks for the feedback, the reason I removed the drag was to against bug. When I was making planes with normal fuselage, I found that the drag was somtimes calculated incorrectly when I mirror it and it created a torque of yaw. So I started to remove them all and add them manually after finnished. I thinking I'd better foucus on drag adding next time. @edensk
There is no aerodynamic purpose for the drop nose, it’s only for a better view.@ChisP
It wasn’t stabled at all from the take off in the video, it was the visual angle what caused the illusion.@BogdanX
It actually will rotator an angle before repeating, so you need to put one more rotator to offset it.@PointlessWhyshouldi
repeat(Time,1)
@PointlessWhyshouldi
I will post 3 different versions which are 2700 1100 and 600 parts.@Skyler717
Oh man, it’s been a very very long time haven’t seen you. Good to see you back.
I prefer the Vodka.XD@PointlessWhyshouldi
Thanks!@ND40X
My tu144 is coming to 2500 parts ,it’s killing me.@GeneralPatrick2
Estimate.@GeneralPatrick2
I’m have been to the Nortre Dame actually, but still can’t figure out how the hell it should be like. Anyway, what is 4TP and 14TP?@RAAF
It’s been canceled unfortunately.
I did spent a very very long time studying the architecture and so many details confused me, and the parts count expected was going to reach 10000, so I have to give it up.@RAAF
I’m sorry that I don’t understand well.@WaffleCakes @NightmareCorporation
It’s been such a long time that no one focus on this little car.XD@BlackhattAircraft
我感觉我不一定做得出来@QingyuZhou
太强了
IT CAN DOGFIGHT
No problem.@sixer
Looks like minus number doesn’t work. I tried 150000 and it just fine.@MisterT
I added the dampermultiplier to about 150000 and it’s much better.@Armyguy1534
By the way, do you know what cause the problem? Because I saw some other plane’s rotator work fine without adjusting the damper.@bjac0
Thanks again!@bjac0
Thank you! It's much better except it moves a little bit slower.@bjac0 @Thelegitpilot13
I will appreciate that if you can tell the solution more specifily.@Thelegitpilot13
Do anyone have this issue? Or solution.
Why the rotator is so weak?
I used 4 Curved Reducer Blocks in my Lancaster’s bomb bay door, the most voted plane of mine.
Very nice skill.@Topgun757
They were connected.@LittleTOADY
Missile power Lancaster.@KarsonHev
Great. I like Britain, how about you?@Notrjmm
747 with space shuttle?@TheMitsuboshiBoi
Just two types of wings.@Jakeisboss
Merry Christmas to you, too.
@ me if you have a question.@ND40X
I’ve been busy recently,I’ll consider when I got time.@ssenmodnar
The plane needs a low speed and a big attack angle to land on the carrier but it nearly stall and doesn’t have a good controlling with that speed. However, it’s still a impressive plane, good job!
I can land it vertically.
No, this plane is too complicated.@hRmm
One thing might be the reason is that I removed the flag on the tail because there is a paint job mistake.@hRmm
Vector engine.@minigun217
Great! Sound barrier.
Thank you!@ND40X
Oh, it’s so excited that I got the first place!
Glad you like my planes. Thank you.@Trainzo
A huge one.
Yeah, I didn’t did well on the wings’ connection part.@hRmm
Check out the mobile version at the bottom of the description.@hRmm
Great!@RamboJutter