Thanks for the feedback, the reason I removed the drag was to against bug. When I was making planes with normal fuselage, I found that the drag was somtimes calculated incorrectly when I mirror it and it created a torque of yaw. So I started to remove them all and add them manually after finnished. I thinking I'd better foucus on drag adding next time. @edensk
It’s been canceled unfortunately.
I did spent a very very long time studying the architecture and so many details confused me, and the parts count expected was going to reach 10000, so I have to give it up.@RAAF
All secrets are in the control surface, there are two rotators connected each control surface. The first one is normal, no groups no inverted. The second one is different, group1(the turrets active group) and inverted. So, when group 1 actives, the control surface will not work because one rotator offsets another.@ND40X
The plane needs a low speed and a big attack angle to land on the carrier but it nearly stall and doesn’t have a good controlling with that speed. However, it’s still a impressive plane, good job!
This is a very nice f-16 no doubt, low part with details and good performance. But there is a little mistake on the main wings, each wing should have only one flaperon.
Thanks for the feedback, the reason I removed the drag was to against bug. When I was making planes with normal fuselage, I found that the drag was somtimes calculated incorrectly when I mirror it and it created a torque of yaw. So I started to remove them all and add them manually after finnished. I thinking I'd better foucus on drag adding next time. @edensk
There is no aerodynamic purpose for the drop nose, it’s only for a better view.@ChisP
It wasn’t stabled at all from the take off in the video, it was the visual angle what caused the illusion.@BogdanX
It actually will rotator an angle before repeating, so you need to put one more rotator to offset it.@PointlessWhyshouldi
repeat(Time,1)
@PointlessWhyshouldi
I will post 3 different versions which are 2700 1100 and 600 parts.@Skyler717
Oh man, it’s been a very very long time haven’t seen you. Good to see you back.
I prefer the Vodka.XD@PointlessWhyshouldi
Thanks!@ND40X
My tu144 is coming to 2500 parts ,it’s killing me.@GeneralPatrick2
Estimate.@GeneralPatrick2
No.@Horribleninja
+1I’m have been to the Nortre Dame actually, but still can’t figure out how the hell it should be like. Anyway, what is 4TP and 14TP?@RAAF
It’s been canceled unfortunately.
I did spent a very very long time studying the architecture and so many details confused me, and the parts count expected was going to reach 10000, so I have to give it up.@RAAF
I’m sorry that I don’t understand well.@WaffleCakes @NightmareCorporation
未来巨佬早期作品
+12It’s been such a long time that no one focus on this little car.XD@BlackhattAircraft
我感觉我不一定做得出来@QingyuZhou
太强了
IT CAN DOGFIGHT
No problem.@sixer
Looks like minus number doesn’t work. I tried 150000 and it just fine.@MisterT
I added the dampermultiplier to about 150000 and it’s much better.@Armyguy1534
By the way, do you know what cause the problem? Because I saw some other plane’s rotator work fine without adjusting the damper.@bjac0
Thanks again!@bjac0
Thank you! It's much better except it moves a little bit slower.@bjac0 @Thelegitpilot13
I will appreciate that if you can tell the solution more specifily.@Thelegitpilot13
Do anyone have this issue? Or solution.
Why the rotator is so weak?
I used 4 Curved Reducer Blocks in my Lancaster’s bomb bay door, the most voted plane of mine.
Very nice skill.@Topgun757
They were connected.@LittleTOADY
Missile power Lancaster.@KarsonHev
Great. I like Britain, how about you?@Notrjmm
747 with space shuttle?@TheMitsuboshiBoi
Just two types of wings.@Jakeisboss
Merry Christmas to you, too.
@ me if you have a question.@ND40X
All secrets are in the control surface, there are two rotators connected each control surface. The first one is normal, no groups no inverted. The second one is different, group1(the turrets active group) and inverted. So, when group 1 actives, the control surface will not work because one rotator offsets another.@ND40X
+1G R E A T
+1I’ve been busy recently,I’ll consider when I got time.@ssenmodnar
Only 15 votes? Seriously?
+1Now, the fuselage.
+2The plane needs a low speed and a big attack angle to land on the carrier but it nearly stall and doesn’t have a good controlling with that speed. However, it’s still a impressive plane, good job!
I can land it vertically.
This is a very nice f-16 no doubt, low part with details and good performance. But there is a little mistake on the main wings, each wing should have only one flaperon.
+1I still remember I was hoping this one can get 500 downloads.lol@CrashFighter05
+2No, this plane is too complicated.@hRmm
One thing might be the reason is that I removed the flag on the tail because there is a paint job mistake.@hRmm
Vector engine.@minigun217
Great! Sound barrier.