@Sarnnox well for one, the truss frame tail you have is nice, however, see how it just has these triangles and no diagonals or anything? Make me aware if this kind of design is a real thing, however this design is susceptible to twisting and bending as there are no crisscrossing peices, if this makes sense. Just a small detail there.
Also, aircraft looks very flattened, and seat is super long. I like the outside rudder pedals but I would just shorten the entire cockpit area, also the fuselage should not taper down to a point before the engine--it is realistic for the engine to be exposed and show the cylinders and everything but it is likely the engine would have at least a small amount of cowling, and some support with the main fuselage staying relatively wide for it. Just some stuff to consider
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook yeah I was looking throuhg your posts and it's like you just switched out the person running the account partway through, quality just went 0 to 60
Wow the detail on the landing gear is unbelievable. However next time try to keep the drag points under 1500 for large airliners. Also, maybe a 747-8 variant to be linked in the description?
Ok lol
@Sarnnox alright! Tag me before posting and I can give more feedback
+1@rexzion sometimes it can be hard for people to think, I understand
@tsampoy lol I noticed that, too
@tsampoy lol I noticed that, too
@Sarnnox well for one, the truss frame tail you have is nice, however, see how it just has these triangles and no diagonals or anything? Make me aware if this kind of design is a real thing, however this design is susceptible to twisting and bending as there are no crisscrossing peices, if this makes sense. Just a small detail there.
Also, aircraft looks very flattened, and seat is super long. I like the outside rudder pedals but I would just shorten the entire cockpit area, also the fuselage should not taper down to a point before the engine--it is realistic for the engine to be exposed and show the cylinders and everything but it is likely the engine would have at least a small amount of cowling, and some support with the main fuselage staying relatively wide for it. Just some stuff to consider
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook yeah I was looking throuhg your posts and it's like you just switched out the person running the account partway through, quality just went 0 to 60
@rexzion ok
@rexzion ok let me know when you are done thinking
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook oof I would say that is wrong of you to say that but your planes are pretty good
Also proportions are skewed slightly
@Sarnnox well it's so fast, has too little drag, and is very over maneuverable
@rexzion still
Very thoughtful description of my Pitts!
My upvote made this the highest rated cargo of the year! Congrats!
@WiiMini I dont get it but ok
@tsampoyLite it's still growing in popularity 10 upvotes in 30 days
That was 2 years ago tho
Thank God theres no BredorkusLite
When you start to think about UltraLightLite lmao
+1@rexzion ok
Oh wow how can you say that of a P-51 (now that I think about it though...)
+1@MAHADI that's what I figured just checking :)
Epiiiic
@Embo I'm gonna have to go with no. The flight model is... off
@rexzion about what
@DickBrazen for most planes 600 is way too much
To make it lighter just set massScale to 0.05 or something else low, via XML
I once made one of these but it sucked. This looks quite nice though! T
@KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo yeah, pretty nice for its part count huh?
+1@SpenzeroInternational lol
+1@Noname918181 OwO kay
@tsampoy thanks!
@tsampoy I feel you.
@ACEPILOT109 \/
Somebody made this before.
If you spotlight, comment, or upvote, I deeply thank you.
@tsampoy we commented in sinc
Wow the detail on the landing gear is unbelievable. However next time try to keep the drag points under 1500 for large airliners. Also, maybe a 747-8 variant to be linked in the description?
+1Speaking of which I better make another ultralight
@M7MD_E04 oh sick
@UsualPioneer @PapaKernels I am a whole 1k behind yaal :(
That box is loking fire dude
@KangaKangaTheRedNosedRoo gotmk
@MAHADI yeah
@MAHADI with just smoothing and glass or are you going to add a bunch of new stuff?
@tsampoy ah yes it is
Extras dont have flaps, make sure to research these important details next time.
Epic mate
@MAHADI can't really say I am usually a fan of nose-cone-inlet planes but... this one is quite ok visually speaking