Hey, I’m just defending my friend and stating from my piloting experience, if you think that counts at harassment then I have no words for you. @Davaskonaviatornewacc
I would hardly call the some of these instances design theft (I mean yes for the TU-4 obviously) but the others are completely different aircraft, some even filling different roles or having very different strengths and weaknesses. I mean, I am a proud American but at least give the Russians some credit here.
This plane does indeed fly quite accurately to how it would IRL. I fly high wing C-172s and C-152s and this just feels like a heavier version of that which it practically is. It has V-speeds that line up closely with its IRL counterpart as well. If you think it has poor control then go play a flight sim with a beaver in it and stop pestering my friend ;) @Davaskonaviatornewacc
There are ways to get some good gameplay, if you and some friends hop on the SP multiplayer mod and screw around a bit there is some good fun to be had. Believe me there is some good content to be had there, you just need to find the right situations ;).
So Uh I didn’t read the entire description earlier, you need to make the whole plane yourself unless it is a collab…. You cant jus slap parts of other peoples planes together buddy @Star737
Ok so basically take your plane off of its cockpit and save the whole thing as a subassembly. Then download my challenge and attach your subassembly to my cockpit. Then your groups entry should count as a successor to my challenge. @gmmmsoares
Huh a rotodyne, now that is something I didn’t expect, well lol I guess It falls under the criteria, I didn’t even think of this airliner configuration!
Look, the entry has to be a completely original new design, you tried to dupe me by entering an aircraft that is mostly not even your own. I do not trust you and I will not be accepting this or any future entries from you. @ToxicAviationAviation
I would recommend changing the lip of the engine to use a method kind of like what I did on my carver, where you change the rear thickness of a hollow fuselage to get the effect that the engine lip is rounded. Other then that I would say that this is one gorgeous wing!
More detailed painting of parts would be nice for more complex liveries and roundells.
+38We’re evolving, just backwards…
+18Oh my god, are those… Actually CORRECT runway markings!? Yes!! The numbers are there!, The 500 and 1000 footers are there! YAaaAaaAs
+13You see, This Missile doesn’t know where it is at all times.
+12Reject triangle, return to s m o o t h.
+11Beautiful, who needs a crappy Garmin G-1000 when you can have one of these bad boys!
+10Me: looks at all of my paneling… well this is useless now
+10I agree, it just seems unnecessary to me
+7Hey, I’m just defending my friend and stating from my piloting experience, if you think that counts at harassment then I have no words for you. @Davaskonaviatornewacc
+7Ok, when do you call the top of a container a cap or a lid? Have fun!
+7Jeremy Clarkson approved @Spikerya
+7I would hardly call the some of these instances design theft (I mean yes for the TU-4 obviously) but the others are completely different aircraft, some even filling different roles or having very different strengths and weaknesses. I mean, I am a proud American but at least give the Russians some credit here.
+7Oh, you are approaching me?
+6Ah perfect, now I can sync my rotary engine with my prop!
+6Man this relatability hits like a truck…
+6Neuron activation
+6This plane does indeed fly quite accurately to how it would IRL. I fly high wing C-172s and C-152s and this just feels like a heavier version of that which it practically is. It has V-speeds that line up closely with its IRL counterpart as well. If you think it has poor control then go play a flight sim with a beaver in it and stop pestering my friend ;) @Davaskonaviatornewacc
+6The f-16 was introduced in 1978... there are 1978 parts... nice one ;)
+6this made my transmission break
+6Perfectly cooked
+6Uhhhh, look I like Easter eggs and all but, ya might want to keep it a bit more PG lol.
+5There are ways to get some good gameplay, if you and some friends hop on the SP multiplayer mod and screw around a bit there is some good fun to be had. Believe me there is some good content to be had there, you just need to find the right situations ;).
+5What is the fresh he** is this!?
+5Pretty sure thats just placeholder stuff till the update @Chancey21
+5Badaladaladla
+5Perfectly cut crash ;)
+4I don’t care what you are, build your own stuff!
+4@RandomNameWithToxic
Yo, you forgot to cover the registration plaque on the 3rd image you forehead, also 👌
+4Wow! this is really well done, its time to go commit war crimes against the Na'vi }:)
+4Always has been... @RuvienRuvienTheCitizen
+4Jeez @Omel please take some time to correct your spelling and grammar. I can feel my English teacher becoming restless.
+4Add it to War Thunder
+4I’ve hit PLATINUM!!!!
+4*spits out coffee
+4you have attained my interest.
+3shoo @MrSilverWolf
+3Garmin can pound sand, this here is the future of avionics! @MrSilverWolf
+3Dude the way these turrets work is so damn cool!
+3Oh no I hope he doesn't steal all of my kroomer
+3Why can’t you just be Normal?!
+3No you may only have 1 entry and @RandomNameWithToxic is no longer allowed to enter @Cereal
+3So Uh I didn’t read the entire description earlier, you need to make the whole plane yourself unless it is a collab…. You cant jus slap parts of other peoples planes together buddy @Star737
+3Ok so basically take your plane off of its cockpit and save the whole thing as a subassembly. Then download my challenge and attach your subassembly to my cockpit. Then your groups entry should count as a successor to my challenge. @gmmmsoares
+3Huh a rotodyne, now that is something I didn’t expect, well lol I guess It falls under the criteria, I didn’t even think of this airliner configuration!
+3Look, the entry has to be a completely original new design, you tried to dupe me by entering an aircraft that is mostly not even your own. I do not trust you and I will not be accepting this or any future entries from you. @ToxicAviationAviation
+3Agreed @Griffon1
+3No @WiFly
+3🤜🤛
+3We are farmers, bumbadumbadum ba dum!
+3I would recommend changing the lip of the engine to use a method kind of like what I did on my carver, where you change the rear thickness of a hollow fuselage to get the effect that the engine lip is rounded. Other then that I would say that this is one gorgeous wing!
+3