@JSTQ Precisely. Granted, the LF-5s could fix this issue provided that they don't get shot down by the SPAAs first, or it could fly at night when it would be somewhat harder to see without night/infrared vision.
@JSTQ Trust me I've tried pistons, they rarely work. If it's stable you'll have too little range, and if the range is anywhat decent it will be unstable. Plus it's unreliable, you'll normally get hit by the missile anyways.
Plus, the feature in concept may not be exclusive to the B-0B, but in current reality it is. There is no other aircraft in the entire CSV which uses such feature, and I didn't plan on using it on any more aircraft except maybe a replacement for the B-0B.
And we gotta have something here mate. You guys have FT missiles and torpedoes, neither of which can be tracked via radar (to my knowledge), and like I said the SBS is literally unstoppable when moving. We need some edge or else the Reformists would just completely take over the world at that rate, less of a war and more of a takeover.
@JSTQ
1. I wouldn't know actually... whether it be my personal preference for quick and intense air combat or simply having little familiarity with most tanks and therefore less motivation to play ground, I'm strictly an air player, I've only played real ground and naval battles once. I've test-driven several tanks, but none of which were SPAAs.
2. Technically it's not invisibility, just radar-invisibility. The naked eye and normal sight devices can still see it with little to no obstructions except maybe at night, so anyone willing to fight the old-fashioned way will actually have no problem with the B-0B (its performance is mid, and its current loadout is little different. Its radar-killer being the only true advantage of it)
But bro I'm literally the M-War II host and this is like the second M-War II post that I wasn't tagged onnn 😭😭😭😭🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
TUPL has been DENIED
I went AFK for ONE DAY PEEPS and my existence has been DENIED
Whyyyyyyyyyyyyy 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭🙏
@JSTQ @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
I tested it with the engine so that's probably why literally everything I tried got pummeled, but logically in combat it would have an engine, so removing it, at least if we want to play realistically, is out of the question.
As for stealth, trust me, conventional stealth will not save us. I'm talkin' like B-0B stealth, maybe even something greater.
@dots Not precisely
Though we get it in the Jet Stream, we don't get an actual notification in terms of that red box by your name which alerts you of the post's existence and directly guides you to it. Plus, some of us don't check our Jet Stream (I should know, my number for unread Jet Stream posts is 7944), so it may not always help.
That's actually why, despite me absolutely loving your posts, I'm rarely on time since I can't always check Recents or Jet Stream.
Nice work destroying their convoy
But this does raise concerns, if the Reformists made it to Krakabloa (they're based at Snowstone, but not strictly yet since they have no clear bases/territory, kinda vagabond-ish) we'll have to up security. Stand by in case they try to intrude into our land again, fellow Sorbets.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Naw we did decently in M-War I, the air was dominated and their ground resistance was aight but not great (the IS-3 carried tbh). And of course, their navy was incredible.
This time will be different. They've got much better aerial combat fighters, and @JSTQ's SBS AA tank is literally unsurvivable unless you have stealth (trust me I tried, all of our M-War II fighters got backhanded by that thing, even the tanks. I didn't try navy but it would probably kill them too. The A-40D survived but at the cost of my game, which crashed when the two were spawned it at the same time. Heck, I'm not even sure if it would survive the Anti OP/Meme Treaty at this rate, only the B-0B can elude the SBS).
Also not related but be careful, the Reformists won't just be a big bad to topple like other forces we've fought, they're gonna strike back. Just got word that one of the Reformist's worst pilots has already claimed 6 kills in a Mu-19.
@KPLBall Ohhh OK
A destroyer? Sweet :D
+1Brings a whole new meaning to Biplane
@RB107 Thanks :D
A new character appears!
@dots No problem mate, always glad to help :D
+1About time :D
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
A very wise plane once said
+1"If you don't drink enough milk, you will have polygon reduction"
This Typhoon did not care lol
Wunderbar :D
+2@JSTQ Precisely. Granted, the LF-5s could fix this issue provided that they don't get shot down by the SPAAs first, or it could fly at night when it would be somewhat harder to see without night/infrared vision.
+1@JSTQ Oh ok
+1Well then I better brace my iPad to do some heavy naval content
@JSTQ Trust me I've tried pistons, they rarely work. If it's stable you'll have too little range, and if the range is anywhat decent it will be unstable. Plus it's unreliable, you'll normally get hit by the missile anyways.
+1Plus, the feature in concept may not be exclusive to the B-0B, but in current reality it is. There is no other aircraft in the entire CSV which uses such feature, and I didn't plan on using it on any more aircraft except maybe a replacement for the B-0B.
And we gotta have something here mate. You guys have FT missiles and torpedoes, neither of which can be tracked via radar (to my knowledge), and like I said the SBS is literally unstoppable when moving. We need some edge or else the Reformists would just completely take over the world at that rate, less of a war and more of a takeover.
@MonsNotTheMonster Eh don't worry it's aite, just tag me on the next one :D
+1@JSTQ
1. I wouldn't know actually... whether it be my personal preference for quick and intense air combat or simply having little familiarity with most tanks and therefore less motivation to play ground, I'm strictly an air player, I've only played real ground and naval battles once. I've test-driven several tanks, but none of which were SPAAs.
2. Technically it's not invisibility, just radar-invisibility. The naked eye and normal sight devices can still see it with little to no obstructions except maybe at night, so anyone willing to fight the old-fashioned way will actually have no problem with the B-0B (its performance is mid, and its current loadout is little different. Its radar-killer being the only true advantage of it)
Beautiful rocketceptor
But bro I'm literally the M-War II host and this is like the second M-War II post that I wasn't tagged onnn 😭😭😭😭🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
+1TUPL has been DENIED
I went AFK for ONE DAY PEEPS and my existence has been DENIED
Whyyyyyyyyyyyyy 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭🙏
This is great!
But I wasn't tagged 😭😭😭
@JSTQ @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
I tested it with the engine so that's probably why literally everything I tried got pummeled, but logically in combat it would have an engine, so removing it, at least if we want to play realistically, is out of the question.
As for stealth, trust me, conventional stealth will not save us. I'm talkin' like B-0B stealth, maybe even something greater.
@SPsidearm Understood.
+1Go get 'em bro
@dots Not precisely
Though we get it in the Jet Stream, we don't get an actual notification in terms of that red box by your name which alerts you of the post's existence and directly guides you to it. Plus, some of us don't check our Jet Stream (I should know, my number for unread Jet Stream posts is 7944), so it may not always help.
That's actually why, despite me absolutely loving your posts, I'm rarely on time since I can't always check Recents or Jet Stream.
Neato!
+1Also, POV: Weakest Navy plane be like:
I like it :D
Noicee
Also is Sava-Hendero our homebase?
Nice work destroying their convoy
+1But this does raise concerns, if the Reformists made it to Krakabloa (they're based at Snowstone, but not strictly yet since they have no clear bases/territory, kinda vagabond-ish) we'll have to up security. Stand by in case they try to intrude into our land again, fellow Sorbets.
RiP to all our lost allies
+1@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Naw we did decently in M-War I, the air was dominated and their ground resistance was aight but not great (the IS-3 carried tbh). And of course, their navy was incredible.
This time will be different. They've got much better aerial combat fighters, and @JSTQ's SBS AA tank is literally unsurvivable unless you have stealth (trust me I tried, all of our M-War II fighters got backhanded by that thing, even the tanks. I didn't try navy but it would probably kill them too. The A-40D survived but at the cost of my game, which crashed when the two were spawned it at the same time. Heck, I'm not even sure if it would survive the Anti OP/Meme Treaty at this rate, only the B-0B can elude the SBS).
@SuperSuperTheSylph @SPsidearm
+2The Reformists are spread across Snowstone.
@Karroc9522 @MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
Yep lol
Also not related but be careful, the Reformists won't just be a big bad to topple like other forces we've fought, they're gonna strike back. Just got word that one of the Reformist's worst pilots has already claimed 6 kills in a Mu-19.
M-War II Special 5:
@RB107
@NominalSituation
@Graingy
M-War II Special 4:
@BlackGearCompany
@Zero0Two2
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore
M-War II Special 3:
@SPSidearm
@Boeing727200F
@SuperSuperTheSylph
M-War II Special 2:
+1@LunarEclipseSP
@SamuelJamesCastor
@NerfAddict
M-War II Special:
@Monarchii
@JSTQ
@Dracul0Anderson
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
M-War II Special:
@MonsNotTheMonster
@AeroTactical
Mailing List 4:
@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
+1@B1BLancer
@IDK0
@LoganAviation
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirlines
M-War II Special 5:
@RB107
@NominalSituation
@Graingy
M-War II Special 4:
@BlackGearCompany
@Zero0Two2
@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore
M-War II Special 3:
@SPSidearm
@Boeing727200F
@SuperSuperTheSylph
M-War II Special 2:
@LunarEclipseSP
@SamuelJamesCastor
@NerfAddict
M-War II Special:
@Monarchii
@JSTQ
@Dracul0Anderson
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
M-War II Special:
@MonsNotTheMonster
@AeroTactical
Mailing List 4:
@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
+1@B1BLancer
@IDK0
@LoganAviation
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirlines
@SPsidearm Thanks :)
Dew it
+1That's a noice Typhoon
The MiG-29 is a pretty-good lookin' aircraft, I must admit
+1Nice work! :D