Option 2, I'll take option 2 for now.
Also, our airbase isn't captured yet, but Bandit is adjacent to us, meaning that they can attack us incredibly effectively.
@KPLBall Depends. In a dogfight, the Terminator can probably last only a little bit due to heavy flare defenses before giving in, but if the Terminator is facing the I-100 at any point, the frontal laser will do it in. The laser on the Red Terminator A is insanely powerful, a clean shot could damage some of our strongest units, like the A-52, Lagwing, naval vessels, even the A-40D would be at least stunned by it.
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Oh in that case:
The SCOURGE magically appeared one day, now we're all fighting it. He doesn't seem like a major threat... for now...
Japan watching the US, Britain, Germany, and the USSR playing hot potato with the B-29:
-Technically Germany didn't have a B-29 but the Me 264 looks close enough
Well done, more Scourge Jets have been neutralized...
However, the Eliminators aren't allat close to Super Planes. They answer to the Terminators, and even they don't seriously hit that mark...
The Scourge relies on numbers for now, but they get stronger and larger with every day... most recent reports suggest the existence of over 8 million active Red Opponents... hopefully we will be strong enough to keep them at bay when the SCOURGE peaks their power.
A hundred? Over a hundred? Around the range you said is about right.
Active is pretty much anyone who does anything on the site like posting, commenting, even upvoting consistently counts as active to me.
@SILVERPANZER Well, 50/50. None remain in service, but serval have been preserved in the MDA's museums.
As for the E.VIII's upgrades, those are all great ideas! My only issue is idk how to do the XML coding for auto turrets, I can however do remote turrets (the current turrets are directly manned, while remote turrets could be interiorly manned, similar to the B-17 vs B-29 turrets).
@SILVERPANZER Yes, allow me to elaborate: Enargite 0: Prototype variant, never mass produced. Only one built. Enargite I: First production variant, but was quickly "extinct" due to engine troubles. Enargite II: Literally just the I but with a much more powerful and reliable engine. Enargite III: The first Enargites only had the 150mm main cannon and the frontmost machine gunner turret. E.III added the back two MGs and the headlights. Enargite IV: Added small bits of external armor as well as improved technology, note that this variant was made around the late '70s (Enargites as a family are old, but the E.VII that we've always seen is brand new- and the only Enargite still in service, aside from the rumored E.VIII) Enargite V: Enargite V was the biggest leap in the Enargite's rise to power, this variant was a complete overhaul which incorporated the several layers of sub-layered armor, upgraded machine guns, anti-air systems, and the unique below-the-hull driver placement. Enargite VI: Better tech equipment and a stronger engine, but the dedicated anti-air system was removed since the machine gunners could handle low-flying attack aircraft. First Enargite VI was produced in 1988. Enargite VII: Enargite VI was actually planned to be the last Enargite variant, but due to the new threat of the M-War, an Enargite VII was made with greater armor and weaponry than ever before. This is where we get the three chain cannons, and the 150mm cannon is upgraded to 200mm.
Enargite VIII: The super-improved version of the Enargite that I STILL need to make, thanks for the inadvertent reminder lol
Other Mentions: M54A2 Shrike: Despite the goal being an improved version of the Shock, the result ended up drawing a lot of inspiration from the E.VII at the true root, like the insanely heavy armament and thick armor. M49A3-C Shock: Pretty much Shrike's case, but it's actually an improved Shock instead of a successor of the M49. Most notably is the "social distancing" weapon which was incorporated on the E.V, but it was angled vertically to knock out bombs and strike aircraft.
@L1nus No problem :D
The Pancake is certainly a fun design, glad to see WT gave it a tad bit of fame. Flight performance of yours overall was wonderful!
Aite, gave it a few good flights, it's very good! Just a couple things I want to say:
-It's nearly impossible to stall the Pancake in WT, but I'm not too worried about this one since the ~60 mph stall speed is more or less a fault of SP physics, at least on most planes.
-From my flights, this Pancake in SP turns slower at high speeds and faster at low speeds. In WT, it's reverse: similar to a delta wing, it turns nearly instantly at high speeds, but slowly at low speeds. Also worth noting: energy retention, the Pancake has never heard of it lol
Other than that, great Pancake! Looks and flies very well.
Option 2, I'll take option 2 for now.
+1Also, our airbase isn't captured yet, but Bandit is adjacent to us, meaning that they can attack us incredibly effectively.
@KPLBall Depends. In a dogfight, the Terminator can probably last only a little bit due to heavy flare defenses before giving in, but if the Terminator is facing the I-100 at any point, the frontal laser will do it in. The laser on the Red Terminator A is insanely powerful, a clean shot could damage some of our strongest units, like the A-52, Lagwing, naval vessels, even the A-40D would be at least stunned by it.
@JSTQ Phase III will probably be more effective, since the
+1SCOURGEhas yet to deploy or show evidence of naval units.HeliPEA! Cool :D
Also, nice profile picture change
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Oh in that case:
The
SCOURGEmagically appeared one day, now we're all fighting it. He doesn't seem like a major threat... for now...The Dragon Lady!
Japan watching the US, Britain, Germany, and the USSR playing hot potato with the B-29:
-Technically Germany didn't have a B-29 but the Me 264 looks close enough
Jokes aside, wonderfully done Tu-4!
+1Well done, more Scourge Jets have been neutralized...
However, the Eliminators aren't allat close to Super Planes. They answer to the Terminators, and even they don't seriously hit that mark...
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Not much, things have been slow, but our base needs heavy repairs now...
The Scourge relies on numbers for now, but they get stronger and larger with every day... most recent reports suggest the existence of over 8 million active Red Opponents... hopefully we will be strong enough to keep them at bay when the
+1SCOURGEpeaks their power.T
+3@JSTQ Let it be done, then!
+1T
Finally posted it lol
Mailing List 6:
@SimplyElegant
@ComradeBazookaBall
TSW Wright Commander/Reformist:
@JSTQ
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
@NominalSituation
@rickofrolls
Mailing List 4:
@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
+1@M109Simp
@LoganAviation
@B1BLancer
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirWorks
A hundred? Over a hundred? Around the range you said is about right.
Active is pretty much anyone who does anything on the site like posting, commenting, even upvoting consistently counts as active to me.
@rumiyote Yesn't, it was planned on paper but never built, kinda like the R2Y2 or XF-108.
+1@JSTQ Nice, FTAAMs
+1@SILVERPANZER Well, 50/50. None remain in service, but serval have been preserved in the MDA's museums.
As for the E.VIII's upgrades, those are all great ideas! My only issue is idk how to do the XML coding for auto turrets, I can however do remote turrets (the current turrets are directly manned, while remote turrets could be interiorly manned, similar to the B-17 vs B-29 turrets).
Nicely done, the Panavia Tornado is probably one of the most unique designs still in service if you ask me
+1@SILVERPANZER Yes, allow me to elaborate:
Enargite 0: Prototype variant, never mass produced. Only one built.
Enargite I: First production variant, but was quickly "extinct" due to engine troubles.
Enargite II: Literally just the I but with a much more powerful and reliable engine.
Enargite III: The first Enargites only had the 150mm main cannon and the frontmost machine gunner turret. E.III added the back two MGs and the headlights.
Enargite IV: Added small bits of external armor as well as improved technology, note that this variant was made around the late '70s (Enargites as a family are old, but the E.VII that we've always seen is brand new- and the only Enargite still in service, aside from the rumored E.VIII)
Enargite V: Enargite V was the biggest leap in the Enargite's rise to power, this variant was a complete overhaul which incorporated the several layers of sub-layered armor, upgraded machine guns, anti-air systems, and the unique below-the-hull driver placement.
Enargite VI: Better tech equipment and a stronger engine, but the dedicated anti-air system was removed since the machine gunners could handle low-flying attack aircraft. First Enargite VI was produced in 1988.
Enargite VII: Enargite VI was actually planned to be the last Enargite variant, but due to the new threat of the M-War, an Enargite VII was made with greater armor and weaponry than ever before. This is where we get the three chain cannons, and the 150mm cannon is upgraded to 200mm.
Enargite VIII: The super-improved version of the Enargite that I STILL need to make, thanks for the inadvertent reminder lol
Other Mentions:
M54A2 Shrike: Despite the goal being an improved version of the Shock, the result ended up drawing a lot of inspiration from the E.VII at the true root, like the insanely heavy armament and thick armor.
M49A3-C Shock: Pretty much Shrike's case, but it's actually an improved Shock instead of a successor of the M49. Most notably is the "social distancing" weapon which was incorporated on the E.V, but it was angled vertically to knock out bombs and strike aircraft.
@AndrewGarrison Alright, great to hear! :D
Looks cool!
+2I've got only one question: will they have the iconic noise of real-life piston engines?
331k pounds, you weren't kidding!
+1T
+1@SILVERPANZER Not just yet, but this is the first step for them to emerge. Give it a few weeks, and not even the seas will be safe anymore...
Any theories for the next article?
Mailing List 6:
@SimplyElegant
@ComradeBazookaBall
TSW Wright Commander:
@JSTQ
Mailing List 5:
@windshifter1
@NominalSituation
@rickofrolls
Mailing List 4:
@Karroc9522
@SuperSuperTheSylph
@KPLBall
Mailing List 3:
@M109Simp
@LoganAviation
@B1BLancer
Mailing List 2:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@YarisSedan
@blt
Mailing List 1:
@TheMouse
@CrestelAeronautics
@PrussianAirWorks
YA-10B is that you?
@L1nus No problem :D
+1The Pancake is certainly a fun design, glad to see WT gave it a tad bit of fame. Flight performance of yours overall was wonderful!
@Thad23 It wasn't squishy enough
@L1nus *Nearly impossible ingame. Not totally, but most circumstances won't result in it.
@StockPlanesRemastered
Cool easter egg, but RiP USS Tiny :<
Aite, gave it a few good flights, it's very good! Just a couple things I want to say:
+1-It's nearly impossible to stall the Pancake in WT, but I'm not too worried about this one since the ~60 mph stall speed is more or less a fault of SP physics, at least on most planes.
-From my flights, this Pancake in SP turns slower at high speeds and faster at low speeds. In WT, it's reverse: similar to a delta wing, it turns nearly instantly at high speeds, but slowly at low speeds. Also worth noting: energy retention, the Pancake has never heard of it lol
Other than that, great Pancake! Looks and flies very well.
Nice XF5U!
Also, I have the Pancake in WT so I can probably give some feedback regarding flight performance/realism when I get the chance :D
@RIGAM0RT1S Makes me think of the French Vautour crossed with a British Harrier
+1BM-1 has a brother now!
+1@IQinventory Np :D
+1Also, @DoctorNowhere means alternate account, @IQPlus iirc
@vSoldierT Quite the opposite, I've been making a ton of stuff in SP1 to prepare for SP2m though I have been posting less frankly
Nice job :D