@ZeroRaven87 They are Wing-2 (all of my modern builds use Wing-2).
The wingflex is algorithm-driven. There was some flutter issue but it was more output oscillation-related than speed-related.
I fixed it by tuning the algorithm and adding damperMultiplier to the rotators.
I used the Inspect console, and I can see that you did, in fact, upload the image, but it isn't showing on our end.
Copy this:  (this is the image link that showed up in the Inspect console), and put it in the description.
Erg leuk!
Ik heb ook plannen om binnenkort mijn eerste elektrische zweefvliegtuig te uploaden.
Ik zal er waarschijnlijk binnenkort een videoteaser van uploaden. (Sorry als ik niet de juiste taalvertaling gebruik.)
@Kiwiki That's likely a physics settings issue.
Certain builds (especially builds that rely heavily on a certain physics setting) don't work well outside of their original physics quality.
Andrew himself stated that they would be focusing more on SP this year.
A new update will come when Jundroo can find the time and reason to do so.
They're not abandoning SP, they just have larger priorities at the moment.
@DeadlyDialga I think that's just SP.com being a bit slow. Sometimes it takes a bit to register upvotes (it takes also takes awhile to send spotlight notifications, sometimes several minutes).
@Airheaddivision Sure! I can't guarantee that I'll be able to help with every problem, but I'll do what I can.
I won't be active for several hours though, so if you tag me during that time I likely won't respond for a little while.
Beautiful.
I've always liked the F-104. Not for any particular reason other than its proportions and power. It's just an amazing aircraft in its own way.
My advice: if you want it done then do it yourself.
And I don't mean this in a rude way, but you're better off learning how to do it yourself than waiting for someone else to do it.
I know that's easier said than done, but trust me when I say it's worth it.
I run maximum physics and graphics settings on 8GB, and it works just fine. It also handles MP decently (as long as there aren't 2000 parts in the same place collectively).
@HuskyDynamics01 Interesting. The drag points changed with the addition of wing wheels (despite them not being anywhere near the pieces that increased in drag). I would assume this is simply a minor bug of sorts.
I'll manually edit the drag scale to something more suitable for sailplanes.
@OwO Unless you meant having a curved trailing/leading edge.
In that case, I would have to completely redesign the wings, due to the technique I use for fuselage wings (which works very well, but is more time consuming).
@OwO Interesting. It would be a bit awkward with the current wing shape though, and I already have winglets.
Plus, the inverted winglets prevent the ailerons from colliding with the ground.
One thing I will say about wingflex is that it needs a rework. The way the joints translate instead of just rotating like an actual joint tends to make the wings/rotors look atrocious, leading to having to settle with Wing-2 wings (which is fine, but requires extra work to get ideal flex).
@ColonelCanada I know of two backup servers (they're listed in my profile), but the last time I checked neither of them worked.
Though, it's been awhile since I last checked so I might need to revisit that.
And of course, modding exists as well.
If a player really wants a new feature added, they could always try to learn modding and do it themselves (easier said than done, but still).
SimplePlanes has its own quality.
It may have it's inconveniences, but in my opinion it simply pushes the player to get creative and find solutions.
Certain things could be improved of course, but I think the original feel should be kept (at least for now).
And yes, a CS-Editor would be fantastic.
Thank you for addressing this.
@L3FTxR1GHT Mod support was removed from mobile devices (mostly).
The only way as of now would be to have the mods included with the stock game upon purchase.
Still publishing...
+2I might be a tad bit early.
@ZeroRaven87 They are
Wing-2(all of my modern builds useWing-2).The wingflex is algorithm-driven. There was some flutter issue but it was more output oscillation-related than speed-related.
I fixed it by tuning the algorithm and adding
damperMultiplierto the rotators.I used the Inspect console, and I can see that you did, in fact, upload the image, but it isn't showing on our end.
Copy this:
(this is the image link that showed up in the Inspect console), and put it in the description.T
+2Erg leuk!
+2Ik heb ook plannen om binnenkort mijn eerste elektrische zweefvliegtuig te uploaden.
Ik zal er waarschijnlijk binnenkort een videoteaser van uploaden. (Sorry als ik niet de juiste taalvertaling gebruik.)
My suggestion is to simply follow what suits your interest.
If simplistic builds are your thing, go ahead.
Test the waters and see what you like best.
@Kiwiki That's likely a physics settings issue.
Certain builds (especially builds that rely heavily on a certain physics setting) don't work well outside of their original physics quality.
Andrew himself stated that they would be focusing more on SP this year.
+4A new update will come when Jundroo can find the time and reason to do so.
They're not abandoning SP, they just have larger priorities at the moment.
"-you may have heard of [a game] called SimplePlanes,"
I believe I have.
Jokes aside, I'm surprised an iPhone7 can run Juno so smoothly.
+8Nice job Jundroo.
@DeadlyDialga I think that's just SP.com being a bit slow. Sometimes it takes a bit to register upvotes (it takes also takes awhile to send spotlight notifications, sometimes several minutes).
Still publishing...
+1I am [the rate at which someone or something is able to move or operate].
Oh my... what have I done this time?
+1⊥
+1@Robomo00119 It can't. As I said in the description it's an unfinished project and it can't perform vertical landings.
+1⊥
@Airheaddivision That works.
@Airheaddivision Sure! I can't guarantee that I'll be able to help with every problem, but I'll do what I can.
+1I won't be active for several hours though, so if you tag me during that time I likely won't respond for a little while.
Beautiful.
+1I've always liked the F-104. Not for any particular reason other than its proportions and power. It's just an amazing aircraft in its own way.
@Airheaddivision No problem.
+1I won't be able to give an exact input expression without further details though.
+1You could give it an input that simulates floppy movement when activated and is locked when deactivated.
I've used something similar this method to simulate gear tilt on a cargo plane, and it works quite well.
+1When using postimages.org, use the Direct Link for images instead of the standard Link.
+1@Mrgoofy It isn't. It's what I use as well.
postimages.org and Discord are the two best working image upload sites for the SP website.
Autotag: @MrCOPTY
Autotag: @Bo1233
My advice: if you want it done then do it yourself.
+2And I don't mean this in a rude way, but you're better off learning how to do it yourself than waiting for someone else to do it.
I know that's easier said than done, but trust me when I say it's worth it.
I run maximum physics and graphics settings on 8GB, and it works just fine. It also handles MP decently (as long as there aren't 2000 parts in the same place collectively).
+11,263rd comment.
@HuskyDynamics01 Interesting. The drag points changed with the addition of wing wheels (despite them not being anywhere near the pieces that increased in drag). I would assume this is simply a minor bug of sorts.
+1I'll manually edit the drag scale to something more suitable for sailplanes.
Voice reveal.
+3@mersedel Are you pressing the ` button?
Sailplane perhaps?
Sailplane perhaps?
+4Looks great!
T
⊥
@OwO Unless you meant having a curved trailing/leading edge.
In that case, I would have to completely redesign the wings, due to the technique I use for fuselage wings (which works very well, but is more time consuming).
@OwO Interesting. It would be a bit awkward with the current wing shape though, and I already have winglets.
Plus, the inverted winglets prevent the ailerons from colliding with the ground.
@OwO Do you have a suggestion for it?
NASA has some UDF footage that can be used as a reference if needed. It should be pretty easy to find on YouTube.
+1Flexible fuselages would make a neat mod (though I can see why that would be a lag nightmare in certain cases).
+1One thing I will say about wingflex is that it needs a rework. The way the joints translate instead of just rotating like an actual joint tends to make the wings/rotors look atrocious, leading to having to settle with
+1Wing-2wings (which is fine, but requires extra work to get ideal flex).Type "T" for tag requests.
Try this:
This may or may not work, since I haven't tested this.
+1You may need to adjust the number for more/less delay. The current delay is at 2 seconds.
@ColonelCanada I know of two backup servers (they're listed in my profile), but the last time I checked neither of them worked.
Though, it's been awhile since I last checked so I might need to revisit that.
In addition to Kangy's comment, it's the only functioning public server (that we know of).
And of course, modding exists as well.
If a player really wants a new feature added, they could always try to learn modding and do it themselves (easier said than done, but still).
SimplePlanes has its own quality.
It may have it's inconveniences, but in my opinion it simply pushes the player to get creative and find solutions.
Certain things could be improved of course, but I think the original feel should be kept (at least for now).
And yes, a CS-Editor would be fantastic.
Thank you for addressing this.
@L3FTxR1GHT Mod support was removed from mobile devices (mostly).
+1The only way as of now would be to have the mods included with the stock game upon purchase.
@L3FTxR1GHT I'm fairly certain that's Apple related and not source code related.
+2In other words, Jundroo can't change that.
@SONYPVM9041QM No idea.
@Iliketoflyfastandlow The server you're trying to connect to is likely either full or non-functional.