I never said losing buttons. I meant that the wired shape of the screen would mean that part of it would not show, since a game would find it unfair to give extra field of vision, forcing them to move other buttons around. I know what optimizing means. I said it would look bad on other iPhones because it would be in a weird place on other iPhones. Since there is no iPhone x only store, that is. Is there? I am not sure. @Shmexysmpilot
@RMark1 The iPhone X is a weird thing in which gaming was not taken into account. I think apple intentionally put the black bars there. Major parts of the game would be cut off. It would look cool, but function ineffectively.
It sorta works. I made a plane extremely unstable once. I put the CoL in front of the CoM and set up a gyroscope. I knew that it would not work well, but I was curious. As expected, the plane auto levels whenever you turn, and it does not turn well. This is because the plane is fighting against yaw pitch and roll. This is not preventable since instability effects all three areas.
As we know. Wing loading affects turn rate directly. The lower, the better. Guess what has a higher combat wing loading? The F-35, or: One of the most massive bombers of the Second World War: The B-17!!!
That is right the F-35 has a higher wing loading than the B-17.
F-35: around 135 lbs/square feet
B-17 “Flying Fortress”: around 110 lbs/square feet.
The money being poured into it is not their own. It is money from places like Britain and Canada.
Mexican lolypops supposedly have lead in the paint. They are promoted. I recently heard of a company promoting $200 wireless headphones that only work if you hold the phone in your hand the whole time.
You are forgetting they are a company planning to make money. Sure, they got the cost down for their fighter-bomber down to 4 times the best us fighter bomber still in service.
They never said anything about it performing well. All they said is that it has increased computing power.
Their ideal is that close range dogfights will become obsolete. Close rangee dogfights happen all the time. Even in the 21st century. And will happen more in the world they are preparing for: one where enemies have stealth jets.
Nowhere did they claim their jet performs well.
But don’t think I hate Lockheed Martin. They are my favorite company. @Ghastfire
The F-35 VTOL/STOL variant is so expensive that it is more costly than the C-5. A plane massive enough to fit the fuselage of a commercial airliner in it.
It was a terrible performer. Famous quote:
“It can’t turn, it can’t fight, it can’t run. Have you examined the Lockheed Martin specifications of the F-35. If you do, you will agree with the experts, and all the countries that pulled out of the F-35.
I’ll search up his name later, but the creater of the F-16 Fighting falcon (one of the best rated fighters. One of the highest rated ground attack aircraft. All at < 1/5 the cost of the F-35) is quoted on a Canadian Documentary to have said it is a terrible aircraft that only accomplishes funneling congressional funds into Lockheed Martin.
I used to disagree with this engineer, then I went to Lockheed Martin’s site, read THEIR specs, and realized it sucks
I only recently moved from wing geometry, to air-foils, so sorry about the ailerons. I thought it looked weird with an appropriate verticle stabilizer. @MethaManAircraft
@NathanMikeska probably the rate at which I mirror, or maybe, when I nudged, it did not connect on the mirrored side. Sometimes I will see that, and I just have to make sure it is connected.
I will see if I have a version that I did not delete. It occurs after mirroring too much. I think it might be at the rate at which I mirror. After finishing the main body, I mirror after every other part. Before testing, I mirror from the left then the right, to counter the chance it tilts when flying. @NathanMikeska
Thank you @goboygo1
It is tiny, so that is why there is little detail, but at least it performs decent, and that is why planes are designed, for performance.
@Jengstrom Oh, I guess it is because I am talking about steam. I also meant to start the plane without the beta, then instal it, and add the parts. If you delete the beta, you cannot access any planes you oppened.
If you want to know what a plane NASA is working on looks like.
https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/aeronautics/bli/
@tsampoy
I forgot that 1 activates afterburner. @tsampoy
Thank you. @tsampoy
Oh ok. I did not know it was different than other iPhones. Please disregard my previous comments. @RMark1
I never said losing buttons. I meant that the wired shape of the screen would mean that part of it would not show, since a game would find it unfair to give extra field of vision, forcing them to move other buttons around. I know what optimizing means. I said it would look bad on other iPhones because it would be in a weird place on other iPhones. Since there is no iPhone x only store, that is. Is there? I am not sure. @Shmexysmpilot
@RMark1 The iPhone X is a weird thing in which gaming was not taken into account. I think apple intentionally put the black bars there. Major parts of the game would be cut off. It would look cool, but function ineffectively.
@CCCP That is a really good idea on how to make sure no one steals your designs!
@fishheads88 @dracofr
Thank you both very much
It sorta works. I made a plane extremely unstable once. I put the CoL in front of the CoM and set up a gyroscope. I knew that it would not work well, but I was curious. As expected, the plane auto levels whenever you turn, and it does not turn well. This is because the plane is fighting against yaw pitch and roll. This is not preventable since instability effects all three areas.
Thank you @goboygo1 @SSSvaSSa @rexinn @TheRealTDawg
I appreciate the support.
Thank you @goboygo1 for the support.
Thank you very much for the support @InternationalAircraftCompany
Realistic airfoils!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@Gestour
@goboygo1
Would you be willing to read these comments, then make your verdict on whether the F-35 is good or not?
As we know. Wing loading affects turn rate directly. The lower, the better. Guess what has a higher combat wing loading? The F-35, or: One of the most massive bombers of the Second World War: The B-17!!!
That is right the F-35 has a higher wing loading than the B-17.
F-35: around 135 lbs/square feet
B-17 “Flying Fortress”: around 110 lbs/square feet.
@Ghastfire
@goboygo1
Read these comments. Then tell both of us what you think about the F-35.
And before you say it next.
Maneuverable just means it rolls well. Nothing to do with turn rate.
@Ghastfire
@Ghastfire
“wow... ok, i see your point. although i have seen it fly before, IRL, and it seemed just fine...”
A commercial airliner flies just fine. Maybe then I should try to turnfight an F-16!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The money being poured into it is not their own. It is money from places like Britain and Canada.
Mexican lolypops supposedly have lead in the paint. They are promoted. I recently heard of a company promoting $200 wireless headphones that only work if you hold the phone in your hand the whole time.
You are forgetting they are a company planning to make money. Sure, they got the cost down for their fighter-bomber down to 4 times the best us fighter bomber still in service.
They never said anything about it performing well. All they said is that it has increased computing power.
Their ideal is that close range dogfights will become obsolete. Close rangee dogfights happen all the time. Even in the 21st century. And will happen more in the world they are preparing for: one where enemies have stealth jets.
Nowhere did they claim their jet performs well.
But don’t think I hate Lockheed Martin. They are my favorite company. @Ghastfire
The F-35 VTOL/STOL variant is so expensive that it is more costly than the C-5. A plane massive enough to fit the fuselage of a commercial airliner in it.
I appreciate it @goboygo1 @JoeBro198 @ThePrototype @grizzlitn
It was a terrible performer. Famous quote:
“It can’t turn, it can’t fight, it can’t run. Have you examined the Lockheed Martin specifications of the F-35. If you do, you will agree with the experts, and all the countries that pulled out of the F-35.
I’ll search up his name later, but the creater of the F-16 Fighting falcon (one of the best rated fighters. One of the highest rated ground attack aircraft. All at < 1/5 the cost of the F-35) is quoted on a Canadian Documentary to have said it is a terrible aircraft that only accomplishes funneling congressional funds into Lockheed Martin.
I used to disagree with this engineer, then I went to Lockheed Martin’s site, read THEIR specs, and realized it sucks
@Ghastfire
Thank you @Baldeagle086 and @rexinn
I appreciate the warm welcome back from being inactive.
Thank you @goboygo1
Long time since I have been on.
Gonna concentrate more on school. @MethaManAircraft
Maybe people don't like my new designs.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/53By9Q/F-17-with-interactive-cockpit
@MethaManAircraft
Every time I build a naval ship, it revives my account. I guess I will have to do that. @MethaManAircraft
No one looks at them I do not know why. @MethaManAircraft
No I won't. No one is going to me since the update. @MethaManAircraft
Oh and congrats on recent gold. @MethaManAircraft
Ok. @MethaManAircraft
I only recently moved from wing geometry, to air-foils, so sorry about the ailerons. I thought it looked weird with an appropriate verticle stabilizer. @MethaManAircraft
I agree with you completely. @MethaManAircraft
Thank you very much @Haruto6561
Then we should all get together and request this. @Blue0Bull
Ok. @IIBluePhoenixII
I keep forgetting when I build. @DOX
You and I both need to put more detail on our stuff. We both have our detail on the tops only, which makes photos hard to be enticing
How is it original if it is a replica.
@NathanMikeska probably the rate at which I mirror, or maybe, when I nudged, it did not connect on the mirrored side. Sometimes I will see that, and I just have to make sure it is connected.
All platforms will get it at the same time. @iLikeipads
I will see if I have a version that I did not delete. It occurs after mirroring too much. I think it might be at the rate at which I mirror. After finishing the main body, I mirror after every other part. Before testing, I mirror from the left then the right, to counter the chance it tilts when flying. @NathanMikeska
BUG!!!
My planes keep saying 1,600 parts when I build them, and lag a ton. When I copy every part I built, it is only 65!
One random part will be copied 1-2,000 times! Usually the cockpit.
I am on steam. Windows 10.
Thank you @goboygo1
It is tiny, so that is why there is little detail, but at least it performs decent, and that is why planes are designed, for performance.
Love the new part transform tool. One of the best parts of the update. Because Mac and IOS cannot get fine tuner.
@goboygo1 thank you
@EpicPigster1 But if you are able to get rid of the beta without deleting the app. Then it will work. That is why steam is able to do it.
@EpicPigster1 That is for steam only. I think.
@EpicPigster1 I am already using it for simple things like panneling on plane wings that I would never even dream of using it for.
@EpicPigster1 If you save your work as a sub-assembly, you can upload it without beta restriction!
@Jengstrom Oh, I guess it is because I am talking about steam. I also meant to start the plane without the beta, then instal it, and add the parts. If you delete the beta, you cannot access any planes you oppened.