@IceCraftGaming I did not with either this, nor the new A3. I did put some pitch rate, roll rate and yaw rate controls in the elevators, ailerons and rudders with the A3, however.
@GuyFolk well, it's a good thing this plane generates a lot of lift due to its really wide wings. I'll find a way to maximize G's on it with pitch rate. Thank you for all of your advice!
@GuyFolk that's something I'll have to figure out later, then. I'll probably use pitch rate for the supermaneuverability mode, or vice-versa, since I still want the aircraft to be able to pull, at minimum, 40G turns, like it does now without supermaneuverability mode active. Rollrate and yawrate are gonna be fairly easy, for sure, since they don't affect turn time, unlike pitch.
@GuyFolk since I was able to do it with my fighter, wouldn't it be better to put the pitch and roll controls on a single rotator per engine? Yaw, I can understand needing to be on a seperate one.
@GuyFolk I kinda think the extra TVC looks cool, but that's just me. Also, honestly had no idea what pitch rate even meant. I kinda copied some of the coding from the other simpleplanes builds, since I know just about nothing when it comes to funky trees. Judging from what it seems to do, decrease max output the faster you go, I might not put a pitch rate at all, unless it's unironically that important. Could I get some advice on that when you can tell me?
@GuyFolk I think I've already asked in other posts, but I wanted to get your opinion on the XF-300-A1 StarHawk that I recently built. Would you mind giving it a look when you can?
@MCapple thank you for your feedback. Also, I've just completed my first supermaneuverable stealth fighter, if you wanna see it. It's the "XF-300-A1 StarHawk".
@SPairforce hey, just wanna say, you have some really nice planes. Also, I have a supermaneuverable stealth fighter in the making, and it's almost finished. Be sure to stay tuned for when it's complete!
@TWDDerSharkmarine that, and the fact that if I reduce the max output, I won't be able to see that afterburner, and my jet will just look weird like that.
@TWDDerSharkmarine this is gonna be a massive problem for me. I want to cut the fuel consumption down on my jet engines WITHOUT decreasing the max output. I mean, seriously. Burning 10 gallons of fuel per second per engine is absolutely unrealistic!
@GuyFolk I don't know if my upcoming supermaneuverable stealth fighter could rival the Archange, but once I make it, would you mind being the judge of it? I'll likely make more than 1 variant, just like how I did multiple variants of the N-33 Berzerker.
@Kkkkyyyafj it's definitely a basic looking aircraft. From the perspective of someone who's been building planes in simpleplanes for a couple of years, I can tell you could achieve something bigger on your own if you just practice. I can't exactly give a rating, since you wouldn't much like what I have to give it, but I gave it an upvote.
Also, I take that back. I doubt my upcoming supermaneuverable fighter could rival your Denouncer, but what I'm making right now could probably beat an F-22 Raptor or Su-57 Felon. Mind checking it out when I make it?
Looks really nice, especially the fuselage, but I'd recommend hiding those rotators on the tail as much as possible; it really throws off the aesthetic look.
@ChiChiWerx trust me, it's not worth the effort. Almost every American vehicle sucks in that game, and if you're as patriotic as me, it'll likely ruin your experience.
@ChiChiWerx basically the word "suck" but in meme form. I said succ because of the massive intake at the nose of the Super Sabre. I used to play War Thunder, and players would also nickname the F-100 the "Catfish".
@donkski thanks for the suggestions, but I wanted the aircraft to look more distinct from the P-47, so no one confuses the 2. Then again, they do have similar fuselage shapes in the front. Your feedback is much appreciated!
@arcticfox123 Sure did. I'm thinking, with the D variants, I'll probably replace the canopy with a teardrop canopy, and make the engine a little bigger.
@LobsterBisque128 ohhhh, got it. He made a really nice game. Just wish it was easier to fly with other players online. Maybe I can't, because I'm an android user, IDK.
@IceCraftGaming I did not with either this, nor the new A3. I did put some pitch rate, roll rate and yaw rate controls in the elevators, ailerons and rudders with the A3, however.
@JamezTV @donkski @IceCraftGaming @Falco7 @JuanShot2Go @Khanhlam @GuyFolk I've made the A3 variant of the StarHawk!
That's cool. Wonder how it would fair in a dogfight against my StarHawk.
@GuyFolk well, it's a good thing this plane generates a lot of lift due to its really wide wings. I'll find a way to maximize G's on it with pitch rate. Thank you for all of your advice!
@GuyFolk that's something I'll have to figure out later, then. I'll probably use pitch rate for the supermaneuverability mode, or vice-versa, since I still want the aircraft to be able to pull, at minimum, 40G turns, like it does now without supermaneuverability mode active. Rollrate and yawrate are gonna be fairly easy, for sure, since they don't affect turn time, unlike pitch.
@GuyFolk since I was able to do it with my fighter, wouldn't it be better to put the pitch and roll controls on a single rotator per engine? Yaw, I can understand needing to be on a seperate one.
@GuyFolk I kinda think the extra TVC looks cool, but that's just me. Also, honestly had no idea what pitch rate even meant. I kinda copied some of the coding from the other simpleplanes builds, since I know just about nothing when it comes to funky trees. Judging from what it seems to do, decrease max output the faster you go, I might not put a pitch rate at all, unless it's unironically that important. Could I get some advice on that when you can tell me?
@GuyFolk thank you for your help and feedback. I'll be certain to fix all of those things with upcoming variants.
@GuyFolk I think I've already asked in other posts, but I wanted to get your opinion on the XF-300-A1 StarHawk that I recently built. Would you mind giving it a look when you can?
@JuanShot2Go I'm happy you like it!
@WNP78 thanks!
@WNP78 what funky tree layout would I need to make something activate, but only if both AG1 and AG2 are activated?
@LaylaSP1 may or may not use this on the StarHawk.
Looks like we have similar ideas when it comes to stealth fighter fuselages.
@GuyFolk I've finished it! It's the "XF-300-A1 StarHawk"!
@donkski thanks for your feedback!
@MCapple thank you for your feedback. Also, I've just completed my first supermaneuverable stealth fighter, if you wanna see it. It's the "XF-300-A1 StarHawk".
@GuyFolk I've just recently completed my first supermaneuverable stealth fighter, if you wanna see it. It's called "XF-300-A1 StarHawk".
@JamezTV thank you!
@arcticfox123 @Adamask @Tsurki I'VE FINISHED MY FIRST SUPERMANEUVERABLE FIGHTER!
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/QaietU/XF-300-A1-StarHawk
@GuyFolk yes. I'm using Fine Tuner, and Overload. It's almost impossible to make anything advanced without those.
@SPairforce hey, just wanna say, you have some really nice planes. Also, I have a supermaneuverable stealth fighter in the making, and it's almost finished. Be sure to stay tuned for when it's complete!
@TWDDerSharkmarine that, and the fact that if I reduce the max output, I won't be able to see that afterburner, and my jet will just look weird like that.
@TWDDerSharkmarine this is gonna be a massive problem for me. I want to cut the fuel consumption down on my jet engines WITHOUT decreasing the max output. I mean, seriously. Burning 10 gallons of fuel per second per engine is absolutely unrealistic!
@GuyFolk I don't know if my upcoming supermaneuverable stealth fighter could rival the Archange, but once I make it, would you mind being the judge of it? I'll likely make more than 1 variant, just like how I did multiple variants of the N-33 Berzerker.
@Kkkkyyyafj it's definitely a basic looking aircraft. From the perspective of someone who's been building planes in simpleplanes for a couple of years, I can tell you could achieve something bigger on your own if you just practice. I can't exactly give a rating, since you wouldn't much like what I have to give it, but I gave it an upvote.
@HorizonHitingxt just did. Thanks.
Also, I take that back. I doubt my upcoming supermaneuverable fighter could rival your Denouncer, but what I'm making right now could probably beat an F-22 Raptor or Su-57 Felon. Mind checking it out when I make it?
@HorizonHitingxt beautiful supermaneuverable jet, but my biggest problem is the missiles, because they literally won't hit anything.
Also, keep an eye out for my profile. I'm developing something that can rival your Denouncer and the Su 57 Felon.
@Tsurki thanks!
@JamezTV thank you!
Looks really nice, especially the fuselage, but I'd recommend hiding those rotators on the tail as much as possible; it really throws off the aesthetic look.
@donkski thank you!
@LobsterBisque128 well that's no good. Hope they do make an online mode for all devices.
@ChiChiWerx trust me, it's not worth the effort. Almost every American vehicle sucks in that game, and if you're as patriotic as me, it'll likely ruin your experience.
@ChiChiWerx basically the word "suck" but in meme form. I said succ because of the massive intake at the nose of the Super Sabre. I used to play War Thunder, and players would also nickname the F-100 the "Catfish".
@donkski thanks for the suggestions, but I wanted the aircraft to look more distinct from the P-47, so no one confuses the 2. Then again, they do have similar fuselage shapes in the front. Your feedback is much appreciated!
@arcticfox123 thank you for your support throughout these variants of the Berzerker!
@ChiChiWerx SUCC
@AlexsandrSenaviev finished all variants of the N-33 Berzerker. I'm especially proud of the D2, if you wanna see it.
@HorizonHitingxt @Milo1628xa @MrGreen I've just finished the N-33-D2 Berzerker! Please check it out when you can!
@PaperPlaneHasDream I've just made the final variant of the N-33! Check out the D2 Berzerker!
@arcticfox123 the final variant has been made! The N-33-D2!
@notJester1944 very nice design. Also, I will soon have out the N-33-D2 Berzerker. When I do, would you mind looking at it?
@arcticfox123 Sure did. I'm thinking, with the D variants, I'll probably replace the canopy with a teardrop canopy, and make the engine a little bigger.
@HorizonHitingxt @MrGreen @Milo1628xa I've just completed the C4 variant of the N-33 Berzerker!
@arcticfox123 @PaperPlaneHasDream I've just completed the N-33-C4 Berzerker! Be sure to check it out, and let me know what you think!
@PaperPlaneHasDream that's exactly what I fixed with the C3 variant, if you wanna take a look at that. Thanks for the feedback!
@arcticfox123 I'll have the C4 variant done soon, probably by tomorrow.
@arcticfox123 elaborate. You mean to make the wing tips more circular, like a spitfire?
@LobsterBisque128 ohhhh, got it. He made a really nice game. Just wish it was easier to fly with other players online. Maybe I can't, because I'm an android user, IDK.