No... I don’t know when you played it, but in the current game the B17 is defintetly able to take a massive amount of damage before being destroyed @TheOwlAce
I’ve tried, but generally the smoke from the missile lags the game and it’s very unpredictable; but the gun did actually point towards the enemy aircraft. Because of this, I’m going to experiment some more and find if I can make a safer model with more accurate gun aiming
If you have the necessary skills you can make an interior right now, I like the fact that hollow fuselages don’t exist; it means that you need to have skill in order to create an interior
I know it’s only a repaint and you’re not stealing. All I said is that if you want to get anywhere in the SP community I suggest you make your own planes. You’ll get more upvotes and people will respect you more @Riismotor
Listen, if you want to get anywhere in SP I suggest taking a different route than just taking planes and uploading them again with a different paintjob and roundel
Well I tried tagging you on lots of the unlisted prototypes, and for some reason you never responded... it’s ok, since I’d already started work on this beforehand. Let’s start another, and we’ll have an equal workflow. I’ll make a very basic fuselage, and then I’ll upload it as unlisted, and we can discuss about design choices and such, and make the entire craft from the start with shared work. Sound good? @Razor3278
Apple supports their devices for software updates much longer than android or most other companies do. The reason you can’t upgrade is simply because your device doesn’t have the specifications necessary to run iOS 11
I’ve been wanting this for a long, long time! I really hope it’s added, but I have a feeling that it’s the sort of thing that the devs won’t add... I hope I’m wrong though!
Cancer jokes are viewed as death threats?! Some people are stupid beyond congnition, but at least your not expelled, and at least you’ve got supporters. I imagine your situation would be much worse if everyone was against you
A Boeing 2707 would be nice. It was the Boeing rival to Concorde in the race to develop the first supersonic airliner. It was dropped because of lack of funds, but the blueprints that remain show that it would have been a very interesting and capable aircraft had production occurred. I think the 2707 would be great 2 year build!
Minimum part count 500 is a problem though. Great aircraft don’t need to be high part counts to be good, I’ve got a very high detailed civilian aircraft with a full cockpit that is only 273 parts. I would recommend dropping it to 100, that seems to be threshold that separates amateur builds from the rest
The drawback to me is cluttered upload pages; as it shows different variations of the same aircraft, and I prefer to just have a list of all the different creations. This is probably only an issue to me, but everyone has their quirks! I don’t find your way unprofessional, it’s just (going back to the cluttered upload page) not professional in the way that defines the way I organise my profile (everyone has different ways of being professional.) Inappropriate was said in a different context that is widely used, I simply meant that we have seperate methods, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
An interesting conclusion, I too find that when I post mobile friendly versions as unlisted they don’t get as many downloads, but my attempts to find whether they’re are more mobile or PC users are inconclusive. I wouldn’t upload it as mobile friendly, but that’s just me, and I like to keep matters strictly professional. I can understand your way of operating, and I respect that; but as I said, it was not a criticism, simply a suggestion. Making it more accessible has its benefits, but to me the drawbacks outweigh other methods, though to you I can see it’s different. We all have seperate procedures to deal with such anomalies, and I respect yours as I hope you respect mine. It was not meant to be offensive in any way, and I hope you are not vexed by the comment. No hard feelings? @SledDriver
I don’t have anything against upvotes, it’s just that the original (which I really like) is the main source, and that a mobile version is a secondary, ‘lite’, version that is accessed by those incapable of running the original. Because of this, I feel as if it’s innaprioate to get upvotes for a simpler version of a more complex version which is existent. The people who enjoy the mobile one should upvote the normal one, and that’s an efficient, easy to run system that results in one creation that everyone can access and upvote, and another which is accessible through the first. I don’t have an issue with what you’re doing, it’s just a suggestion, not a criticism @SledDriver
Just a suggestion, you should probably upload the mobile version as unlisted and have a link to it in the description of the standard version; that way you don’t get multiple extra upvotes from the same design
Thanks! @Johnnyboy9
Very nice!
I don’t, but I especially don’t trust you @Tully2001
I don’t trust anything you say with Ainsley staring at me while I read it @Tully2001
So are you going to delete this now it’s fixed?
No problem @Aerofy
I’ve come to the conclusion that you need more attention, your builds are great! I think you’ve got potential
Great plane! Nice job on this one
No problem, you were at 1,000 and still bronze, so I decided to push you to silver. Congratulations! @Aerofy
Yeah, they’ve been there for about a month
Ok that sounds good @Lylian
No... I don’t know when you played it, but in the current game the B17 is defintetly able to take a massive amount of damage before being destroyed @TheOwlAce
A B17 can take a massive beating in WT, but bombers like the Wellington and Stirling are extremely easy to take out @TheOwlAce
+1Why don’t you post it as unlisted and tag the person who ordered it there?
Wow, I’ve been playing for 2 years 3 months 22 days 48 minutes, but I only made my account about 1 year and 9 months ago
I’ve tried, but generally the smoke from the missile lags the game and it’s very unpredictable; but the gun did actually point towards the enemy aircraft. Because of this, I’m going to experiment some more and find if I can make a safer model with more accurate gun aiming
If people want to use a 1:1 cockpit in scale with the rest of the aircraft then this would be very useable @Epicfail
Very nice to fly, but it is very hard to control turret vertical rotation because it also controls Trim
I agree, but I can see both sides of the argument @Flightsonic
Maybe you should have made the deadline a month after the start, 7 days isn’t enough for lots of people @Ageramaster595
this took about a week to make, but I was working on it about 3 hours a day
True @denialofservice
If you have the necessary skills you can make an interior right now, I like the fact that hollow fuselages don’t exist; it means that you need to have skill in order to create an interior
My entry is the Aristotle M5A “Wolf”
It’s a nice repaint though :) @Riismotor
After only a month? Well ok then... bye
Thanks! It’s great to be gold! @Ihavenorealideawhatiamdoing
I know it’s only a repaint and you’re not stealing. All I said is that if you want to get anywhere in the SP community I suggest you make your own planes. You’ll get more upvotes and people will respect you more @Riismotor
Listen, if you want to get anywhere in SP I suggest taking a different route than just taking planes and uploading them again with a different paintjob and roundel
Well I tried tagging you on lots of the unlisted prototypes, and for some reason you never responded... it’s ok, since I’d already started work on this beforehand. Let’s start another, and we’ll have an equal workflow. I’ll make a very basic fuselage, and then I’ll upload it as unlisted, and we can discuss about design choices and such, and make the entire craft from the start with shared work. Sound good? @Razor3278
Apple supports their devices for software updates much longer than android or most other companies do. The reason you can’t upgrade is simply because your device doesn’t have the specifications necessary to run iOS 11
Thanks! @Loopy200
Be great if you could use the Phalanx or Condor
Very nice
Great job!
I’ve been wanting this for a long, long time! I really hope it’s added, but I have a feeling that it’s the sort of thing that the devs won’t add... I hope I’m wrong though!
Cancer jokes are viewed as death threats?! Some people are stupid beyond congnition, but at least your not expelled, and at least you’ve got supporters. I imagine your situation would be much worse if everyone was against you
A Boeing 2707 would be nice. It was the Boeing rival to Concorde in the race to develop the first supersonic airliner. It was dropped because of lack of funds, but the blueprints that remain show that it would have been a very interesting and capable aircraft had production occurred. I think the 2707 would be great 2 year build!
Great! We all have our different opinions, and we can go about our profiles in whichever way we choose. Have a good one @SledDriver
Minimum part count 500 is a problem though. Great aircraft don’t need to be high part counts to be good, I’ve got a very high detailed civilian aircraft with a full cockpit that is only 273 parts. I would recommend dropping it to 100, that seems to be threshold that separates amateur builds from the rest
+1Beautiful! Amazing job on this build!
cough
Beautiful! Nothing beats a biplane formation aesthetically
Thanks! That was a lot of passion in describing the detail :) @ForeverPie
The drawback to me is cluttered upload pages; as it shows different variations of the same aircraft, and I prefer to just have a list of all the different creations. This is probably only an issue to me, but everyone has their quirks! I don’t find your way unprofessional, it’s just (going back to the cluttered upload page) not professional in the way that defines the way I organise my profile (everyone has different ways of being professional.) Inappropriate was said in a different context that is widely used, I simply meant that we have seperate methods, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
Great! It’s a very important step to make as it allows you to detail them very well! @Stellarlabs
An interesting conclusion, I too find that when I post mobile friendly versions as unlisted they don’t get as many downloads, but my attempts to find whether they’re are more mobile or PC users are inconclusive. I wouldn’t upload it as mobile friendly, but that’s just me, and I like to keep matters strictly professional. I can understand your way of operating, and I respect that; but as I said, it was not a criticism, simply a suggestion. Making it more accessible has its benefits, but to me the drawbacks outweigh other methods, though to you I can see it’s different. We all have seperate procedures to deal with such anomalies, and I respect yours as I hope you respect mine. It was not meant to be offensive in any way, and I hope you are not vexed by the comment. No hard feelings? @SledDriver
I don’t have anything against upvotes, it’s just that the original (which I really like) is the main source, and that a mobile version is a secondary, ‘lite’, version that is accessed by those incapable of running the original. Because of this, I feel as if it’s innaprioate to get upvotes for a simpler version of a more complex version which is existent. The people who enjoy the mobile one should upvote the normal one, and that’s an efficient, easy to run system that results in one creation that everyone can access and upvote, and another which is accessible through the first. I don’t have an issue with what you’re doing, it’s just a suggestion, not a criticism @SledDriver
Just a suggestion, you should probably upload the mobile version as unlisted and have a link to it in the description of the standard version; that way you don’t get multiple extra upvotes from the same design