@DeejeX Paste the code i put into the ailerons, elevators, and rudder respectively. The 100 and 50 are arbitrary and if you want more stabilization, make the number smaller and vice versa
Smaller control surfaces should help, but it will make your plane less maneuverable. Or you can try giving stabilized control surfaces a try if you don't want to sacrifice maneuverability. (Roll)+(RollRate/100*((-abs(Roll)+1)/1)) (Pitch)-(PitchRate/100*((-abs(Pitch)+1)/1)) (Yaw)-(YawRate/50*((-abs(Yaw)+1)/1))
@DeveloperKorzalerke must've forgot, thanks for letting me know
+1Nothing left to redo.
+3@Ded I don't give the older aircraft enough love in that game
except that one time I did the MG only run with a MiG-21
pterosaurkhoi
This would be possible if we could edit the input for guns/cannons
+2@AdmiralWheatman that is a kulbit and hopefully yes
+2We're in your walls.
+1@Bryan5
+1@TheCommentaryGuy @NARGII @donkski
+1@CaptainSquadronLeaderX @Spitfirelad05 @TRD
+1@DeveloperKorzalerke @OkaNieba @KangBaksoSoeharto
+1Now that I think about it, there's no in-game tutorial on using subassemblies
+6@Ren My powers have doubled since the last time we met, Count.
+1@Dathcha enGineer
Screw the pilot, how's the airframe holding up?
+2@PriyanshuGM if you mean how it bulges out, US cobras are like this. I know international variants have squared off canopies
@Spitfirelad05 Indeed it is!
Yo i saw this irl
+10Meanwhile in the alternate universe where the closed canopy was chosen over the halo
+2@ZeroWithSlashedO i was inspired by yours :v
@ZeroWithSlashedO ¯_(ツ)_/¯
now that im looking at it their tails look almost the same but thats it
@DeveloperKorzalerke from college
+1@ZeroWithSlashedO Initial variants were known as the HueyCobra. I'm guessing it's because they share the same engine, transmission, and rotor system
+1@000007 average fortunate son fan vs chad for what it's worth enjoyer
You should give it schurzen!
+2I̷͇̳̲̋ ̸̧͇͉̜̇̇̑̄C̷͈͊̇̔R̶̫͚͋̔̊̽ͅA̵̮͖͆̑͆͒V̵̛̙̜́͐Ě̶̪ ̵̤̲̅̃H̴̦͉̭͚̔E̶̡͙͂͜A̴̼͋̂T̶̖̯̲̝̃̍̊ ̴̢̈́̍͜S̸̬͙̽̀̓́Į̸̰̰͗̈́͆̀Ḡ̶̺̅͋Ṇ̶̦͇̲̉͝Ą̷̮̈̓̈́T̵͉̏̓̎͝U̵̻̣͐R̷͕̩̞̒E̴̦͋
+6How does one return from brazil and live to tell the tale
@WolfHunter9111 yep!
+1@OkaNieba not atm
@Dragoranos they have the same engine, transimission, and rotor system
@ssenmodnar Of course, you don't need to ask :)
@SirRhyvs comedy 100
+1@ssenmodnar myes?
@SirRhyvs wow that was fast o.o
@CaptainSquadronLeaderX @Ren @BestBuilderEverNOCAP
@OkaNieba @donkski @KangBaksoSoeharto
@BeastHunter @NARGII @SirRhyvs
+1Bottom right
@DeejeX via XML overload, look for inputController in the wings/rotators
@asteroidbook345 50..... 40.... 30.... 20.. 10.
@DeejeX Paste the code i put into the ailerons, elevators, and rudder respectively. The 100 and 50 are arbitrary and if you want more stabilization, make the number smaller and vice versa
@JerryZePilot Everything before the MiG-15bis except the F-15C is outdated
I might update that one but it'd be a pretty major overhaul
Should've had the undo button send you to the backrooms
+2Smaller control surfaces should help, but it will make your plane less maneuverable. Or you can try giving stabilized control surfaces a try if you don't want to sacrifice maneuverability.
+1(Roll)+(RollRate/100*((-abs(Roll)+1)/1))(Pitch)-(PitchRate/100*((-abs(Pitch)+1)/1))(Yaw)-(YawRate/50*((-abs(Yaw)+1)/1))@ColonelCanada @WinsWings oo ee oo aa aa
+1@WolfHunter9111 Without markings they're technically the same :v
+1@MachesterF1 Yeah the thinnest nose possible seems to be the style of the MS series :)
At least it's not Lotus's 2014 nose
Isn't the nose a bit skinny for 2016?
Also, the livery reminds me of the early 2000's McLarens
I think something is wrong with the F-16
pow(Brain,999)
+4cobruh
+2