@Kt1578 Idk. My Skyhawk was really a modification of the HAWK2909 with thicker wings and a rounded leading edge. I also turned mine into a pocket Puff the Magic Dragon.
@BogdanX Credit to the original maker of the plane, I believe HAWK2909's Cessna 172. I just tweaked it a bit and converted it into a pocket-sized AC-130 gunship.
@mikoyanster If you are wondering why this plane looks familiar, it's because I used your F-5 model and did the said modifications to it to make a T-38.
@PyrusEnderhunter 1) My guns are the first to feature underbarrel grenade launchers. 2) Underbarrel shotguns are more for blasting open doors than killing people. 3) Rocks are cheaper, and there's always buttstroke.
@PyrusEnderhunter Last time I checked, my guns have more ways to kill.
You can shoot them in the face, stab them in the face with a bayonet, or hit them in the face with a buttstock.
You are still good at making guns. There's just a big difference in approach.
I prefer to keep things simpler. An era where weapon customization meant painting your weapon. A time where your main muzzle attachment was either a flash hider, bayonet, rifle grenade launcher, or variant thereof; suppressors were the realm of those who work in secret. Reloading quicker was a matter of taping two magazines together. Your sights were iron; only marksmen and snipers got an optic, and that's so they can shoot farther. Only if you were on sentry duty at night did you get any night vision scopes. The only time there was something hanging under your barrel was if you were a platoon leader and was fortunate enough to get an M203.
Your guns are of a more modern era, where every weapon can and will accept accessories of any sort. Suppressors, flashlights, laser sights, CQB optics, scopes, and foregrips of every shape. Even shotguns can be added. Bayonets, iron sights, and rifle grenades are a forgotten relic, although the flash hider of every M16 and M4 can accommodate a rifle grenade, iron sights can be fitted to Picatinny rails, and even to this day, every assault rifle made has a bayonet lug. Every accessory can be fitted to every rifle issued to everyone.
@PyrusEnderhunter Also, based on our experience in Africa, your systems are still ineffective. Of the 100 Phantoms, 150 Tigers, and 50 Starfighters, with six-hundred missions and over nine-thousand sorties, we only noted seven losses; one Phantom to a landing mishap, two F-5s shot down by ground fire, two F-104 lost in accidents, and two F-104 lost to engine failure. The F-104 was considered the least safe aircraft of the three to fly due to its tricky flight characteristics and single engine configuration; the dual engines of the F-4 and the F-5 provide some measure of redundancy if one engine was not able to function due to in-flight damage or breakdown, and are much easier to fly. In Paternian service, the low safety margin for the F-104 is partially compensated by its use with more skilled reservists and use as a dedicated interceptor.
If you want to tag someone, put an "@" before their name. For example, @Tapak.
@YuukaNeko Can you tacticool this 1911?
Thanks! @Multidimensional
@YuukaNeko @GoldenEagle @PINK You're going to love this.
@PyrusEnderhunter The X-20 is an IRL craft.
@PyrusEnderhunter A shuttle would be nice, but we already have one; the X-20 Dyna-Soar.
@PyrusEnderhunter Nope. Long-term sustenance is space was already explored at this point, and we would establish a presence on the moon.
I do have that ability. Which vehicle are you referring to? I am busy, so don't expect quick results. @Hayhayjam664
Man, I'm planning that shiet in the 1980's. First, the moon. Next: Mars. @PyrusEnderhunter
Of note: the left outer wing is not attached. Please attach it in a fashion symmetrical to the other side.
@BogdanX here it is.
Gotcha. Thanks for letting me know! @BogdanX
@KDS Target practice for my Pummelers.
@Kt1578 He doesn't make many planes. And he hasn't made one for seven months.
While my builds are probably of similar quality, I tend to post a lot more frequently than he does.
@Kt1578 Idk. My Skyhawk was really a modification of the HAWK2909 with thicker wings and a rounded leading edge. I also turned mine into a pocket Puff the Magic Dragon.
@BogdanX Credit to the original maker of the plane, I believe HAWK2909's Cessna 172. I just tweaked it a bit and converted it into a pocket-sized AC-130 gunship.
@saturn28 That was fast.
@Treadmill103 Credit to SpiritusRaptor for the P-80 body I built it out.
@XxcreedexX You go make your T-33.
@XxcreedexX You can still do that.
When I make replica planes, I prefer to use an existing build and modify/upgrade it to my needs.
Love it!
@mikoyanster Thanks!
Well, he did make half the plane. @saturn28
@mikoyanster If you are wondering why this plane looks familiar, it's because I used your F-5 model and did the said modifications to it to make a T-38.
Cool!
对不起。 @realluochen9999
是。 @realluochen9999
But your country doesn't have enough money to buy Kalashnikov assault rifles. @PyrusEnderhunter
@PyrusEnderhunter So far, they're the only ones.
@PyrusEnderhunter 1) My guns are the first to feature underbarrel grenade launchers. 2) Underbarrel shotguns are more for blasting open doors than killing people. 3) Rocks are cheaper, and there's always buttstroke.
@YuukaNeko My only complaint about this weapon is the upward ejection pattern. It doesn't throw spent cases away from the user.
Those are often fitted in the field. @PINK
@PyrusEnderhunter Last time I checked, my guns have more ways to kill.
You can shoot them in the face, stab them in the face with a bayonet, or hit them in the face with a buttstock.
You are still good at making guns. There's just a big difference in approach.
I prefer to keep things simpler. An era where weapon customization meant painting your weapon. A time where your main muzzle attachment was either a flash hider, bayonet, rifle grenade launcher, or variant thereof; suppressors were the realm of those who work in secret. Reloading quicker was a matter of taping two magazines together. Your sights were iron; only marksmen and snipers got an optic, and that's so they can shoot farther. Only if you were on sentry duty at night did you get any night vision scopes. The only time there was something hanging under your barrel was if you were a platoon leader and was fortunate enough to get an M203.
Your guns are of a more modern era, where every weapon can and will accept accessories of any sort. Suppressors, flashlights, laser sights, CQB optics, scopes, and foregrips of every shape. Even shotguns can be added. Bayonets, iron sights, and rifle grenades are a forgotten relic, although the flash hider of every M16 and M4 can accommodate a rifle grenade, iron sights can be fitted to Picatinny rails, and even to this day, every assault rifle made has a bayonet lug. Every accessory can be fitted to every rifle issued to everyone.
美国的公立学校教世界语言不好。 @realluochen9999
Keep in mind that this is the XM5 Victoria. @PINK
Pretty much. @TemDesBur
Credit to mikoyanmaster for that! @Treadmill103
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Gotcha. How many?
我说中国不好。@realluochen9999
好。 @realluochen9999
Indeed. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@realluochen9999 I thought the aircraft involved in that incident was an EP-3 Orion?
@PyrusEnderhunter lol goodnight. The Paternian Air Force sends its regards.
And by regards, I mean "the destruction of your ground defenses".
@PyrusEnderhunter State it.
lol preordering before thing hits drawing board. @DankDorito
lol @Viper28
@PyrusEnderhunter No.
This is for when we reach 1985. Then I can deploy Victorias and stomp the shit out of the competition.
@PyrusEnderhunter Also, based on our experience in Africa, your systems are still ineffective. Of the 100 Phantoms, 150 Tigers, and 50 Starfighters, with six-hundred missions and over nine-thousand sorties, we only noted seven losses; one Phantom to a landing mishap, two F-5s shot down by ground fire, two F-104 lost in accidents, and two F-104 lost to engine failure. The F-104 was considered the least safe aircraft of the three to fly due to its tricky flight characteristics and single engine configuration; the dual engines of the F-4 and the F-5 provide some measure of redundancy if one engine was not able to function due to in-flight damage or breakdown, and are much easier to fly. In Paternian service, the low safety margin for the F-104 is partially compensated by its use with more skilled reservists and use as a dedicated interceptor.
@PyrusEnderhunter I didn't know that.