I'm surprised the mods are on to try and bring them back, but the reason they were disabled almost a year ago was due to a new policy with both Google Play and the App Store in regards to how the code of Unity is allowed to be modified. And as such, they are no longer allowing external Unity modifications
.
However, as Philip stated before, there are source codes you can use to try and modify it yourself, but it could damage the game if you do it wrong
@BeastHunter Sorry! XD
I am not working on a B-50, although if you'd like, I could build a KB-50J one day
.
Right now, I am working on three other projects, one is a fictional heavy bomber/hydroplane, and then my B-36 project, and I am currently making a Cessna 337 (teaser will be out soon)
@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat aww mann, you're right. Oh well, a bigger and better one will likely be built after we first get through this upcoming global conflict
SNCASO SO.4000 might tickle your interest based on your recent builds. It was an experimental bomber, and the first indigenously designed jet bomber in France
what do your centers look like?
.
I commonly have this issue. One thing you could do from a general standpoint is move the center of mass forwards, and then enlarge the vertical stabilizer (assuming you are using fuselage wings)
I draw out basic designs XD
I don't do anything too specific, because unless I use graphing paper and redraw it 5 times, it looks like hot garbage
.
And might I be the first to point out, DAMN THAT PAINTING IS SO FREAKING GOOD
@Phoebe @X99STRIKER OH CRAP
.
I'm sorry. I deleted this after wanting to post it, and for some reason it actually posted and didn't just disappear? XD
.
Sorry
I know the drawing is terrible, I just wanted an idea
.
I did make the fuselage WAY too bloated, but I did that to see it better, and I ran out of room for the wings lol. I currently have most of the fuselage done, and am working on the horizontal stabilizers
Blueprints are a good start, mate. Then use slicing to match the outline of the canopy (if the canopy is external). if the canopy/cockpit is internal or more inline with the fuselage, just slice that area out!
.
Another thing, if you use the first method, I'd suggest making the fuselage larger than needed and then slicing it down
Also, is it okay if I've been working on the remaster for some time and haven't finished it yet, or do you want me to start from scratch?
What if I remastered this into a semi-god tier build? Would that be good enough?
@AlmostADev cough 4000 parts cough
@Flewey
@Flewey I remember you tho. Glad you're still around, I thought you had left!
@Flewey aww, thank you mate! I absolutely will
.
I'll send you a link to a thing I'm working on too lol
@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat lol
Lol
Dear god
+2What hath Blender come to
I'm surprised the mods are on to try and bring them back, but the reason they were disabled almost a year ago was due to a new policy with both Google Play and the App Store in regards to how the code of Unity is allowed to be modified. And as such, they are no longer allowing external Unity modifications
+1.
However, as Philip stated before, there are source codes you can use to try and modify it yourself, but it could damage the game if you do it wrong
No more than 300!?
+1Anywho, take my upvote mate. I'm participating in like 2 challenges already tho, so I might not make it to this one. Sorry
@PapaKernels 😅 we don't talk about that...
+1@Sparky6004 @Dathcha 💀
@BeastHunter alright. I gotcha mate
+1@BeastHunter Sorry! XD
+3I am not working on a B-50, although if you'd like, I could build a KB-50J one day
.
Right now, I am working on three other projects, one is a fictional heavy bomber/hydroplane, and then my B-36 project, and I am currently making a Cessna 337 (teaser will be out soon)
mmm. good plon
+2@CarrotSlicingCompanyCat aww mann, you're right. Oh well, a bigger and better one will likely be built after we first get through this upcoming global conflict
+1@asteroidbook345 😂
+1Where did you get this information?
+1@CharlesDeGaulle this is awesome!! You made some really fast progress lol. T
+1SNCASO SO.4000 might tickle your interest based on your recent builds. It was an experimental bomber, and the first indigenously designed jet bomber in France
+2This is sick!!
+2yay!
what do your centers look like?
.
I commonly have this issue. One thing you could do from a general standpoint is move the center of mass forwards, and then enlarge the vertical stabilizer (assuming you are using fuselage wings)
Almost 4K!
+1@Almost indeed. The hydrogen bonds cause water to hydrate itself
+1Cessna 337 allowed? I might be in
@HunterStriker XD
+1I did the same thing when I typed that out
I draw out basic designs XD
+2I don't do anything too specific, because unless I use graphing paper and redraw it 5 times, it looks like hot garbage
.
And might I be the first to point out, DAMN THAT PAINTING IS SO FREAKING GOOD
This is freaking awesome!!! This is supremely underrated
+1.
Also, are you cool if I borrow these X-4 missiles?
@IceCraftGaming no change anymore. It used to be double points tho
15 points for an upvote on a build/video post
+2.
2 points for an upvote on a forum
.
7 points for a successor
It was a question about an insignia for my alternate WW2 for a combined US and USSR symbol for aircraft
@Phoebe @X99STRIKER OH CRAP
.
I'm sorry. I deleted this after wanting to post it, and for some reason it actually posted and didn't just disappear? XD
.
Sorry
I know the drawing is terrible, I just wanted an idea
.
I did make the fuselage WAY too bloated, but I did that to see it better, and I ran out of room for the wings lol. I currently have most of the fuselage done, and am working on the horizontal stabilizers
the brackets (
+1[]) are for an alternate text, given that the image does not load correctlyso put
+2![]()down, and put the link to the image or gif in the()part.A-HA
@BeastHunter that's sick!! Also, T
+3.
I'm doing a similar for a WW2 alternate history (I believe you read that post)
@BeastHunter gasp you're doing an alternate history too!?!?
+1yee
+1@MemrWii cool, thx mate
Is amphibious allowed?
I think that better summarizes my question lol
If so, I have an interesting heavy bomber design I've been wanting to try
Is the only stipulation that it can take off of and land on water?
@UserP194 good luck, mate. please stay safe
+3sick
+1DAYUM
+2TTTTTT
Blueprints are a good start, mate. Then use slicing to match the outline of the canopy (if the canopy is external). if the canopy/cockpit is internal or more inline with the fuselage, just slice that area out!
+2.
Another thing, if you use the first method, I'd suggest making the fuselage larger than needed and then slicing it down
@Jackrei a beauty like this never rusts