@SPairforce It's because this thing makes me angry, because of an in-joke this thing gets +150 upvotes and at least 20 spotlights, while me and many other mid-skilled creators get barely 10 upvotes for something we tried out best to look good.
First, I rotated the entire thing around, then I put the "correct" control surface scheme (roll on the front wings, pitch on the back wings, yaw on the top wing.)
Second, moved the front wings even more to the front (they're covering the back portion of the engines now.)
Third, removed all angles from the wing gears moved them closer to the surface controls, removed the fixed front gear and put the big retractable gear in the front inside the Fuselage.
Fourth, made the rudder (top wing) a symmetric profile wing (this means it won't turn slightly to the left now.)
Fifth, added a back to the cockpit with some fuselages, it looks 5% nicer now.
Listen, fam, you ain't gonna give up now, instead, you'll make a new freaking plane, then you'll make it perfect my trial and error, that's what you'll do.
If you going to just do that to someone else's aircraft, halfbutt a modification, keep it to yourself, unless it's a fixed version that was asked for.
Create a true cargo bay for the bombs, use hinges, and structural panels, use the customization tab that the fuselage cylinders have to their full extent.
But save that triple bomb holder, you can use it on smaller aircraft.
@StrangeGameAYT Its weird that the engines are exploding for you, I just did a bit of testing after I moved the engines into the fuselages while using medium physics and it seems alright.
Also, the pitch surfaces on the swivel wings, put Invert to Yes and Trim to On so that they pitch correctly in relation to the tail wings.
Tail wings need to move up to pitch up, while canard or surfaces ahead of the COM have to move down to pitch up for example.
I could see you doing a Tumbler inspired vehicle with this.
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/batman/images/5/57/Thedarkknight17po4.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20240705235837
@SimpleSquareManufacturer Sorry if it was supposed to be a joke, but, making fuselage wings look good is actually a hard thing for the average joe, like me.
@GiuliMBorgesYT Ah, certo, as Únicas superfícies aerodinâmicas são as asas bem de fora, a placas que ligam as fuselagens não tem física de voo aplicada, ou pelo menos não deveriam ter.
Team Fortress 2?
+8So... Why exactly we don't have that here?
+8@SPairforce It's because this thing makes me angry, because of an in-joke this thing gets +150 upvotes and at least 20 spotlights, while me and many other mid-skilled creators get barely 10 upvotes for something we tried out best to look good.
+5That it for a beta?
3 switches? Expected more from this huge hiatus SP got from the Dev Team.
+4Fixed your aircraft, gonna tell you how I did it.
First, I rotated the entire thing around, then I put the "correct" control surface scheme (roll on the front wings, pitch on the back wings, yaw on the top wing.)
Second, moved the front wings even more to the front (they're covering the back portion of the engines now.)
Third, removed all angles from the wing gears moved them closer to the surface controls, removed the fixed front gear and put the big retractable gear in the front inside the Fuselage.
Fourth, made the rudder (top wing) a symmetric profile wing (this means it won't turn slightly to the left now.)
Fifth, added a back to the cockpit with some fuselages, it looks 5% nicer now.
Listen, fam, you ain't gonna give up now, instead, you'll make a new freaking plane, then you'll make it perfect my trial and error, that's what you'll do.
+4Welcome back, I guess.
+3(praying hands emoji)
+3WE FINALLY GOT GLASS! How exactly we had Jet technology before knowing how to heat up sand is unknown tho.
Also, finally I can make Nukes without some Fuselage mumbo jumbo.
+3Chibi Super Saber.
+3That's beautiful.
My 2nd favorite fake car in Gran Turismo.
+2Sus door.
+2Newest development from Pixar Industries:
+2Thunderblot.
+2@Spaceflower S p o o k y.
+2Question, could there be a Universal switch for the Fuselage Smoothness? As in, the smoothness gets applied to all fuselages in an aircraft?
+2Has incredible looks.
Now I'm curious as to how you'll implement a powerplant without ruining it's lines by a huge margin.
+2@TurtlesThatFly Seems comprehensive enough, what a hell show.
This thing doesn't deserve this amount of attention for such a retarded joke.
+2@EternalDarkness What exactly is happening here? Why is this thing getting so many upvotes?
Who let this happen?
+2Start using Fuselage cylinders.
+2Don't take me wrong, but...
If you going to just do that to someone else's aircraft, halfbutt a modification, keep it to yourself, unless it's a fixed version that was asked for.
Create a true cargo bay for the bombs, use hinges, and structural panels, use the customization tab that the fuselage cylinders have to their full extent.
But save that triple bomb holder, you can use it on smaller aircraft.
+2Well, you're missing a true wing on the aircraft right side, for starts.
+2@StrangeGameAYT Its weird that the engines are exploding for you, I just did a bit of testing after I moved the engines into the fuselages while using medium physics and it seems alright.
Also, the pitch surfaces on the swivel wings, put Invert to Yes and Trim to On so that they pitch correctly in relation to the tail wings.
Tail wings need to move up to pitch up, while canard or surfaces ahead of the COM have to move down to pitch up for example.
+1What's out of hand is this dude's thumb.
Thing's growing out of his index knuckle.
+1You can use the Fine Tuner tool to hide those 3 engines better.
+1Wow, an egg-shaped German jet that's not made by Blohm and Voss?
+1The type of thing an Air Force officer would force into service.
+1Yeah, the X-32 looks better, that tail just irks me.
+1One, the A-10 has been in service for 50 years, its a 1970s plane, like the F-15 and F-16.
Two, the A-10 isn't being replaced, not fully retired until say, the 2030s, yes.
Third, the cropduster, or OA-1K Skywarden or Skyraider II, is only made supposed to be US SOCOM light attacker plane, not of the entire US Army.
+1@Graingy There's two other reasons for 47.
The USAF was born in 1947.
P-47 Thunderbolt was an excellent aircraft in WW2.
And yes, the 47th president is also a reason, because apparently, Trump was a key person in the making the F-47.
+1And now you even have nose space to put a few MGs there.
Just like how the real P-38 did it.
+1When will we get a Lunchly one?
(The cheese is all green and grey)
+1Anything for Ruskovia yet?
+1I'm rather unsure on what to do.
I have two already made aircraft that follow this either, but I don't know which one is more cursed, a Typhoon combo or a Scorpion combo.
+1Why is the minimum 87 parts?
Is that how many parts you need for a Brazilian flag or something?
+1Now you can plant twice the amount of pilots into the ground at once.
+1Can I get a source on that cropped anime girl?
F-15 Foxhound.
+1Mig-15 in 15 parts, that's amazing.
+1@Graingy Good, he has good taste.
+1I could see you doing a Tumbler inspired vehicle with this.
+1https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/batman/images/5/57/Thedarkknight17po4.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20240705235837
@SimpleSquareManufacturer Sorry if it was supposed to be a joke, but, making fuselage wings look good is actually a hard thing for the average joe, like me.
+1@JohnHorton I hope you understand I wasn't complimenting you.
+1What exactly you mean by "Fixed"?
What did you fix? How did you fix it?
+1Why don't the fuselage cylinders connect properly?
+1Hey, just wanted to say I already uploaded mine.
+1Why some XML codes lack Default values?
+1Looks great, the intakes could be bit more open tho.
+1@GiuliMBorgesYT Ah, certo, as Únicas superfícies aerodinâmicas são as asas bem de fora, a placas que ligam as fuselagens não tem física de voo aplicada, ou pelo menos não deveriam ter.
+1@Shadowed Not OP, but, c'mon, Russian Sukhois are skinny beauties.
+1What's that thing on it's back?
+1@Iar4xc No worries.
+1