@Shippy456 I've just finished testing it.
It looks good, I see all the affort you've put into detailing this jet.
.
It flies decently, but that autoroll is way too strong, and it's almost impossible to follow a straight line while taking off, as it tends to deviate to the right.
I really like the landing gears, they look smooth enough to me.
.
Why didn't you choose a more conventional way to use your weapons?
The more complicated it gets, the less time the people are going to spend trying to figure out how it works. Try to make it less messy on your next build!
.
You still have a lot to learn, that's natural.
But overall it's a really nice plane, good luck with the Challenge!
.
PS: Are you a mobile player?
Hey @nicolascolissi14 !
I'm sorry, but at the moment I am not planning to build a new Attack Helicopter, as all the progress on the H-101 Upgrade got lost.
Maybe you'll see one in the near future
@TheXDimension32 yes I just did another quick research, when used as "low speed airbrakes" they are pointed outwards like this.
The picture was just to show that they are used as such.
Great build anyway, nobody can deny that.
@nicolascolissi14 weird, so it's a combination of both depending by the speed of the aircraft, interesting.
I have no idea about how I could have missed them.
Beautiful, I see all the effort you've put in creating those decals!
But I do have to make you notice, that the Airbrake got removed in the E/F upgraded version, where Rudder Deflection was used as a substitute, like in the newer Su-35S for example.
Apart from that it's fairly good build!
@Shippy456 they're the same.
J-31 is the prototype/design name, FC-31 is the actual designation for active service, such as the YF-22 later named F-22 for example.
@ChiChiWerx alright, so first of all, thank you again for the precious informations, and second, would you be my mentor and my main source of knowledge about the topic? ❤️
I've heard from Bogdan that you surely know a lot about on the topic, because of your awesome job..
I'd just love to only have a chat with you about it!
And about the autoroll, it's not exactly because of improper and asymmetrical drag calculations as I previously thought, but because of a default misalignment in the main cockpit part.
This causes all mirrored parts to be not equally distant from the actual center of the aircraft by a factor of 2E-7 (or around that number), which becomes pretty significant when the wings used are scaled down to a tenth of the original size.
I still don't know why it happens, or if it's just because of the fact that I changed PC due to the sudden death of my ol' reliable. It could also be because of the high part count, as it never happened before with simpler builds.
@ChiChiWerx I just realized that it pulls way too many G for a trainer aircraft.. I should consider to update this jet to a less fictional state..
PS: I also found out what was the actual issue with the autoroll on both the Su-25 and the LF-114. And it's way more confusing than @BogdanX thought..
@ChiChiWerx I simply love this F-105, it has some stunning details, and it's almost perfectly accurate in every aspect!
I'm sorry to myself for not have seen this build for more than half a year...
:O
@Shippy456 in this case, your aircraft is way more impressive. Good job again! Keep up the good work!
@ChiChiWerx thank you! Couldn't have been such a gem without your help.
@TheFantasticTyphoon sure, just a couple for now.
+2the hype is real
@nameisalreadytaken thank you! I'm actually surprised!
+1You did not copy. This is the exact same build.
+2Take it down by yourself, or a moderator will.
@Hedero I'm really happy to hear that! Have fun with it!
Thank you @edensk !
+2@Shippy456 I've just finished testing it.
It looks good, I see all the affort you've put into detailing this jet.
.
It flies decently, but that autoroll is way too strong, and it's almost impossible to follow a straight line while taking off, as it tends to deviate to the right.
I really like the landing gears, they look smooth enough to me.
.
Why didn't you choose a more conventional way to use your weapons?
The more complicated it gets, the less time the people are going to spend trying to figure out how it works. Try to make it less messy on your next build!
.
You still have a lot to learn, that's natural.
But overall it's a really nice plane, good luck with the Challenge!
.
PS: Are you a mobile player?
My head hurts. Damn lepidopterans..
Hey @ForeverPie , did you manage to fix the rotators from going crazy when the aircraft is still?
Ten Million Relief Plan Intensifies
@Woozyliana second line on the instructions:
+1"Be careful, spawning them at any "Approach" location, will make them pop up as friendly."
@thefalkenreich FYI, I will release a new Trainer Jet on Friday, it will be far more realistic and better performing than the old T-1A
@Hedero thank you! Even though it actually looks like something I can't say because of NSFW rules
+1@thefalkenreich sure, why not?
@Spaceflower it's actually LE
@JohnnyBoythePilot thank you! Not the most useful among my creations, but I thought it was worth the upload
+1Now I miss my old account .. 😞
Hey @nicolascolissi14 !
+1I'm sorry, but at the moment I am not planning to build a new Attack Helicopter, as all the progress on the H-101 Upgrade got lost.
Maybe you'll see one in the near future
@jamesPLANESii I knew people would have associated it to the VW, dammit..
+4@FairFireFight I would have preferred going for an Italian name, but I like the T-12 designation
@FairFireFight thank you, but I know well.
And as I already specified in the description, T-2 is just a temporary name.
@CRJ900Pilot thank you!
I'm honestly in love with those kind of builds. Good job
+2PALINDROMES
+1Majestic!
Half the size of the Burj Khalifa
@TheXDimension32 yes I just did another quick research, when used as "low speed airbrakes" they are pointed outwards like this.
The picture was just to show that they are used as such.
Great build anyway, nobody can deny that.
@EternalDarkness
Thank you. I implemented many new techniques in building this aircraft
@nicolascolissi14 weird, so it's a combination of both depending by the speed of the aircraft, interesting.
I have no idea about how I could have missed them.
Beautiful, I see all the effort you've put in creating those decals!
But I do have to make you notice, that the Airbrake got removed in the E/F upgraded version, where Rudder Deflection was used as a substitute, like in the newer Su-35S for example.
Apart from that it's fairly good build!
@nameisalreadytaken thank you.
+1Regarding the name, by meaning Wind I thought it sounded too basic
Finally, what a shame that Osea isn't in the game.
+2Hey man! Thanks for tagging me.
+1Nice design! I love Cold War Era fighters, and well, your one's a mix of three of them!
Motherland
+1@Shippy456 they're the same.
J-31 is the prototype/design name, FC-31 is the actual designation for active service, such as the YF-22 later named F-22 for example.
What a shame, you didn't use the pink camo scheme..
Heya, glad to see you're back!
@nameisalreadytaken sure :)
+1@Baldovino . - .
+1Mea culpa 😂
Bruh
+1@Baldovino ciao!
Forse non ti ricordi di me, ma questo è il mio nuovo profilo!
Sono FrogmasterAeronautics 😄
@edensk 🤷🏻♂️
+1Considering that this was made on Android, it's pretty impressive!
@ChiChiWerx alright, so first of all, thank you again for the precious informations, and second, would you be my mentor and my main source of knowledge about the topic? ❤️
I've heard from Bogdan that you surely know a lot about on the topic, because of your awesome job..
I'd just love to only have a chat with you about it!
And about the autoroll, it's not exactly because of improper and asymmetrical drag calculations as I previously thought, but because of a default misalignment in the main cockpit part.
This causes all mirrored parts to be not equally distant from the actual center of the aircraft by a factor of 2E-7 (or around that number), which becomes pretty significant when the wings used are scaled down to a tenth of the original size.
I still don't know why it happens, or if it's just because of the fact that I changed PC due to the sudden death of my ol' reliable. It could also be because of the high part count, as it never happened before with simpler builds.
@ChiChiWerx I just realized that it pulls way too many G for a trainer aircraft.. I should consider to update this jet to a less fictional state..
PS: I also found out what was the actual issue with the autoroll on both the Su-25 and the LF-114. And it's way more confusing than @BogdanX thought..
Looks nice.
Still got a lot to learn, but so far so good! Keep up the good work!
@ChiChiWerx I simply love this F-105, it has some stunning details, and it's almost perfectly accurate in every aspect!
I'm sorry to myself for not have seen this build for more than half a year...
@MarinoYeet
yes