@FumoCirno yeah fair enough.
also to clear confusion, my comment wasn’t talking of reproduction online, that’s another story (don’t plagiarise basically), I did mean in physical form.
good to see you are aware of the significance of said documents.
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes yeah my thing is by no means good lol. it had a part limit which was nice in that i made something for everyone to use. im pretty content with where the su-26 ended up, nearly 60 upvotes which i don't care much for, downloads however... over 1k, i never expected that at all.
and yes agreed, best is super subjective unfortunately, and i don't consider something to be the best, because its relative to my views hence why i commented on more than one build.
love everyone just using this for self advertising instead of answering the question
the swl series are great for vr use, but externally look pretty poor. this thing is amazing, and a super unique flight experience.
and i don't own vr, i'm speaking on other people's thoughts.
@starmango no juno is different
juno is much more complicated in terms of a lot of things
i don't like the building on it as a result, i think if sp had almost everything else juno has it'd be great, hence why juno isn't 'sp2' and sp2 should be within the dev's course of actions
Very cool
Love seeing the wedgie with the surf board.
I live further south where the closest based are point cook and east sale so I don’t get the chance to see RAAF stuff bar a few PC-21s here and there.
i've seen some with cockpits so it's not the first
i can see there is effort, but its not the most accurate model on the site.
most sections of the aircraft have incorrect cross section, particularly the nose, cockpit etc
i say this as an absolute panther enjoyer by the way not a reflection of you
@WarringMunky fine then lmao
If winning an Internet argument is so important for your precious ego go ahead and have it. Brag about it anywhere you want. See whether people care
@WarringMunky what is it with you? I'm not here to insult, i don't need to go to such lows to get my point across. i haven't said a single thing to attempt to offend you.
i have merely said that your joke is hard to distinguish because text is close to emotionless. that is all, there is no need to try and convince me that i'm stupid and you're a god
haha @mrsliver war im quijer tjan you
+1why??
im austalise an in tje fuure!!
add keneth to simplelanes
+1@GoldenSidewinder it’s on my list of stuff I want to make
+1extremely loud incorrect buzzer
+1why yiu shaved iBrows off
+1yiur aibake id romg!!!!!1!
+1😎😎💥💥🛢️🛢️🦅🦅🇺🇸🇺🇸 (bam rosted)
@Sparky6004 haha all good :)
+1have a great day mate!
i finally got the points to spotlight this thing
+1(and the brain power to remember to do so)
okay
+1@FumoCirno yeah fair enough.
also to clear confusion, my comment wasn’t talking of reproduction online, that’s another story (don’t plagiarise basically), I did mean in physical form.
good to see you are aware of the significance of said documents.
+1oh hey you exist
+1i did plan to enter your korean war challenge btw hope you didn't forgor
(i totally didn't forget i had a mig-15)
literally 1984
+1@TriStar oh my god not this crap again please
+1its not even sp focused anymore
there's almost no benefit from being in the server for sp players
TIJ TOJ SOG!!!!!!!!!!!
+1I LOFE PE
so what if people make fun of it?
+1I don’t think it’s something you should worry of, life’s too short to fuss over small stuff like that
me fr
+1in the future there will be flying cars!!
+1mercedes:
can I make f-5 now??
+1@Moderators stop argumenting wolfidh!!!!!!!
+1@RepublicOfCursedPlanes yeah my thing is by no means good lol. it had a part limit which was nice in that i made something for everyone to use. im pretty content with where the su-26 ended up, nearly 60 upvotes which i don't care much for, downloads however... over 1k, i never expected that at all.
and yes agreed, best is super subjective unfortunately, and i don't consider something to be the best, because its relative to my views hence why i commented on more than one build.
+1love everyone just using this for self advertising instead of answering the question
+1the swl series are great for vr use, but externally look pretty poor.
this thing is amazing, and a super unique flight experience.
and i don't own vr, i'm speaking on other people's thoughts.
GLROIUS PREIDNET @ANEW GARIDSON
+1are c*nstipated
+1IAS is in m/s so if you want something almost the speed of sound use that
+1but anyway
IAS<300&Throttle>80
@WinsWings awesome thanks
+1Is it required to have achieved combat service? Or is just produced within 1939-1945
+1Cool
+1I was gonna enter but never did but now I can enter
Yip e
i've wanted to do something similar for a little bit, even wanted to start up an alt account for it at one point
+1this is uhhhhhj uhmmn uhhhj
+1@MIAW26PERSIAN nuh uh
+1that's what the follow button is for ;)
there's no way they respond
+1i doubt there's anything in the works anyway. i mean, i hope there is but, juno is just priority
@GuyFolk yep haha
+1@GuyFolk oh no i meant that its a tanker lol
+1finally a proper f/a-18 replica
+1@starmango no juno is different
+1juno is much more complicated in terms of a lot of things
i don't like the building on it as a result, i think if sp had almost everything else juno has it'd be great, hence why juno isn't 'sp2' and sp2 should be within the dev's course of actions
@MIAW26PERSIAN yeah I saw your C-46, I’ve yet to fly it but it gives me a very good impression.
+1Very cool
+1Love seeing the wedgie with the surf board.
I live further south where the closest based are point cook and east sale so I don’t get the chance to see RAAF stuff bar a few PC-21s here and there.
One to one is obviously for replicas
+1But I’ve seen rc builds are rarely posted and are kind of a missed opportunity in this game
simple planes will keep you from the simple pains
+1@PuckusAirplanesAndMore read the description??
+1it's a realistic ish build, not made like the average SP plane which flies perfectly all the time
@WinsWings i do plan to make a full version of this and the yak-52.
+1but i have so much other stuff i want to do so yeah
@Korzalerke2147483647 no there’s still a way
+1Not many know of it and it’s intended to be kept that way
nuh uh you can still upvote unlisteds
+1i've seen some with cockpits so it's not the first
+1i can see there is effort, but its not the most accurate model on the site.
most sections of the aircraft have incorrect cross section, particularly the nose, cockpit etc
i say this as an absolute panther enjoyer by the way not a reflection of you
@realSavageMan I’ll leave it at health complications.
+1@Default4 yeah no i didn’t intend that. I see what you mean, apologies.
+1Thank you for clarifying rather than drawing conclusions.
@ShinyGemsBro oh mate that is awesome thank you!
+1definitely of major use for most fighter jet builds.
@WarringMunky fine then lmao
+1If winning an Internet argument is so important for your precious ego go ahead and have it. Brag about it anywhere you want. See whether people care
@WarringMunky what is it with you? I'm not here to insult, i don't need to go to such lows to get my point across. i haven't said a single thing to attempt to offend you.
+1i have merely said that your joke is hard to distinguish because text is close to emotionless. that is all, there is no need to try and convince me that i'm stupid and you're a god
when I make a plane fly realistically and it adds realism to it
+1