Helilover deleted his original account and then came back as helicopterboy, but now it appears he deleted his newer account as well. He got a lot of flak from some users because of how popular his builds were despite them being relatively low-quality.
@Texasfam04
Oh yea, I also successfully made 2 new weapons, a "pulse laser" and a powerful directed-EMP-pulse weapon. The pulse laser is alright, kind of a glorified gun + laser, but the EMP pulse is absolutely brutal.
@Texasfam04
It turns rather slow and the whole drone is slow itself, averaging right around 400mph. Realistically, it's saving grace is the fact it can carry a ton of missiles and has an integrated laser turret.
@wonkapilot
Sure, just don't have P in PAC stand for "Pavelania"
Idk change it to something else that starts with a P. Like I said I don't care if anyone else uses the term "PAC" but just make sure your P means something different, and not Pavelania.
@EternalDarkness
The Vans RV-3 and the very first Quickie model are the only planes of their lines that had 1 seat. The Quicker later had a 2-seat variant and pretty much all Vans kits these days produced are 2-seat airplanes, except the RV-10, which is a 4-seater. And like I already said, mine is a fictional version that's using those two planes as inspiration.
@EternalDarkness
The Quickie Q200 and most Van RV's are 2-seaters, and I'm doing my own design that's INSPIRED by the two and I'm probably gonna aim for 4-seats instead of two.
Not sure. Maybe you'll be alright as long as you use 100% your own models you build and not others? I recently did a Blender 3D modeling project for my 3D modeling class and I used SimplePlanes to model a Bell-206-look-a-like helicopter and then exported it to Blender so I could animate it there.
@Notaleopard
Sure I mean it's not like I own the abbreviations "PAC" or anything. There's plenty of other companies that use "PAC" such as Pacific Aerospace. It was just a short-hand way of saying "Pavelania Aircraft Company" in my case.
@wonkapilot
Never made them. The P7A and the C7A are the only 2 variants of the Samson. I did have plans to further develop the design, but eventually I scrapped my old companies and nations I was roleplaying with and started a single new RP company, Rainier Aerospace. So because of that I scrapped plans to make more Samson variants.
@Tank6376 NOTAR isn't designed to use a tail-rotor. It uses the thrust/air provided by the turbines and vents out that air out of slots/vents at the very rear of the tail-boom which has a rotating nozzle for directional control.
The flying box of sherbet ice cream
lol wut
yee
@UrMomCarBroomBroom
Sure I guess.
@ColonelStriker
Strike Fighters?
Helilover deleted his original account and then came back as helicopterboy, but now it appears he deleted his newer account as well. He got a lot of flak from some users because of how popular his builds were despite them being relatively low-quality.
+1An F-22 Raptor? Sweet, can't wait!
omg I thought that was real at first! XD
+1bAmBoOzLeD aGaIn
@Spacedoge12345plane
+1I've made an insanely agile Mach 8 missile.
DCS World?
@UrMomCarBroomBroom
Thx!
Happy B-day!
@Texasfam04
Oh yea, I also successfully made 2 new weapons, a "pulse laser" and a powerful directed-EMP-pulse weapon. The pulse laser is alright, kind of a glorified gun + laser, but the EMP pulse is absolutely brutal.
@Texasfam04
It turns rather slow and the whole drone is slow itself, averaging right around 400mph. Realistically, it's saving grace is the fact it can carry a ton of missiles and has an integrated laser turret.
@Texasfam04
Its probably gonna be most useful in CAS roles and arsenal/missile-slinging support for manned fighters.
@Texasfam04
Thanks, unfortunately it doesn't perform as well as it looks. :\
She looks hungry for some subs. ;)
Beautiful, absolutely beautiful!
@wonkapilot
Alright sounds good.
@wonkapilot
Whatever suits you.
@hopotumon
Np, this is one sweet ride!
@wonkapilot
Sure, just don't have P in PAC stand for "Pavelania"
Idk change it to something else that starts with a P. Like I said I don't care if anyone else uses the term "PAC" but just make sure your P means something different, and not Pavelania.
@yoshicraze
Thanks!
@EternalDarkness
It'll be my first official GA plane in a LONG time.
@EternalDarkness
It's fine.
@EternalDarkness
The Vans RV-3 and the very first Quickie model are the only planes of their lines that had 1 seat. The Quicker later had a 2-seat variant and pretty much all Vans kits these days produced are 2-seat airplanes, except the RV-10, which is a 4-seater. And like I already said, mine is a fictional version that's using those two planes as inspiration.
@EternalDarkness
The Quickie Q200 and most Van RV's are 2-seaters, and I'm doing my own design that's INSPIRED by the two and I'm probably gonna aim for 4-seats instead of two.
Not sure. Maybe you'll be alright as long as you use 100% your own models you build and not others? I recently did a Blender 3D modeling project for my 3D modeling class and I used SimplePlanes to model a Bell-206-look-a-like helicopter and then exported it to Blender so I could animate it there.
+1I'm probably going to do something along the lines of a Vans RV or a Rutan Quickie Q200.
b A m B o O z L e D a G a I n
+1Guitar so I can play some D A N K tunes
+1@wonkapilot
What, Rainier Aerospace?
@Notaleopard
sure I guess
@Notaleopard
Sure I mean it's not like I own the abbreviations "PAC" or anything. There's plenty of other companies that use "PAC" such as Pacific Aerospace. It was just a short-hand way of saying "Pavelania Aircraft Company" in my case.
D A T S D A N K
Just name it Thunderchief or Thud instead.
@Notaleopard
It's my old now-dead role-playing company that I made this plane under. I now play under "Rainier Aerospace" instead of PAC or Nordan.
@willy1111
@VeryUnprofession
@Texasfam04
Thanks!
That's cool and all but....
+6Can it go Mach 4?
744406061995
Larry Foulke
12-17-1903
@elmong
@willy1111
Thank you!
@wonkapilot
Sure go right ahead, just credit me.
@SledDriver
+1@Tw1st3dPs7ch0
@yoshicraze
Thank you!
@grizzlitn
+1@SodiumChloride
@JED
Thanks!
@wonkapilot
Here's my latest plane that belongs to my current RP company.
@wonkapilot
Never made them. The P7A and the C7A are the only 2 variants of the Samson. I did have plans to further develop the design, but eventually I scrapped my old companies and nations I was roleplaying with and started a single new RP company, Rainier Aerospace. So because of that I scrapped plans to make more Samson variants.
@BlackhattAircraft
Thanks!
@Tank6376
NOTAR isn't designed to use a tail-rotor. It uses the thrust/air provided by the turbines and vents out that air out of slots/vents at the very rear of the tail-boom which has a rotating nozzle for directional control.
@Nickr
People who requested to be tagged when it was released.
@Carbonfox1
Thanks!