I will directly send ETSF (Air defense units (SBS-2, ZG-6) and artillery units (HLS-4, BFX-11)) to support you.
You guys choose one, or would you like to invite others to join?
The attack on Yeager Airport undoubtedly served to divert the enemy's attention, allowing us to further develop our technology... But why am I doing this?
Six months ago, during M-War II, I implemented the same strategy of counterattacking after the enemy's initial move. Yet, after enduring immense suffering on the front lines, the situation ended inconclusively. Now that we have completed the development of all weapons required for the first phase of the incident, why wait any longer?
Based on this, I propose the following plan:
We will launch tactical missiles from Wright Island to disable Bandit Airport, ensuring they lose control of the forward airfield and drawing enemy fire.
@SilverTheDogfighter Though I might be certain of what you are referring to, I must remind you.
The term "Experimental" in "Second Experimental Outpost" was not added arbitrarily.
A question: Do they need airports?
To be honest, the current Antetus Alliance is both suited and struggling to counter them, because advanced FT missiles are not cheap. If they had airports, the LF-12A would make them understand the core of air superiority theory. But...
... Perhaps that experimental project needs to be launched ahead of schedule.
@SPWithLizzie @BOSSentinel First, I want to confirm the event—Bos, because 444 did not follow his instructions within the specified time, carried out the strike as threatened using a private company's vessel carrying a large number of civilians. However, the intensity of the strike was too extreme, or the action itself was too radical, which provoked dissatisfaction from others. The situation even escalated to the point of threatening to blow up the vessel, and then it fell into the dilemma of how to define this vessel. Is that correct?
@SPWithLizzie @MetallicBeef6572 @BOSSentinel Sorry, but regarding the "paramilitary organization," I have some thoughts, so I would like to request permission to join the discussion. If anyone disagrees, I will withdraw.
Bro, you did a pretty good job. It would be even better if the bullet trajectory could be optimized (or maybe this is a unique feature? Since it’s hard to predict).
Bro ended up like this largely due to a lack of experience. When others condemn you from the moral high ground, the important thing is not to refute them but to seize the high ground yourself.
For example, in another RP: M-War II, I got into a heated argument with a participant who was competing with me for Wright Island. When I threatened to attack the military port with anti-ship missiles:
He: "We are hosting a routine festival on our warships—you would be attacking civilians!"
Me: "The cunning enemy is using civilians as human shields."
If you're referring to the issue of the aircraft slightly rolling on its own, I can tell you-there's an overall offset along the X-axis in your part assembly. You'll need to identify which specific part is causing the problem by testing through sequential deletion of components.
Unfortunately,I don't have time to assist with testing right now, as I'm currently working on a special project for the 93rd Anniversary Military Parade.
No thoughts, really. I just want to join the game as an ordinary person. Then elbow-strike every troublemaker with an LT-12A FT air-to-air missile.
.… Wait, what do you mean they're using LT-12As too?
@KPLBall can keep dreaming. Mach 10? I might as well just declare you the winner.
@Boeing727200F
TSW: The SCOURGE War
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Here are two options:
You guys choose one, or would you like to invite others to join?
Because I will be in my exam month, I won't have time to polish this story. My apologies.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
This is truly unfortunate news.
The attack on Yeager Airport undoubtedly served to divert the enemy's attention, allowing us to further develop our technology... But why am I doing this?
Six months ago, during M-War II, I implemented the same strategy of counterattacking after the enemy's initial move. Yet, after enduring immense suffering on the front lines, the situation ended inconclusively. Now that we have completed the development of all weapons required for the first phase of the incident, why wait any longer?
Based on this, I propose the following plan:
We will launch tactical missiles from Wright Island to disable Bandit Airport, ensuring they lose control of the forward airfield and drawing enemy fire.
Additionally—change my tag to Reformist
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Can I only make anti-ship weapons?
@SilverTheDogfighter oh ok
@SilverTheDogfighter Though I might be certain of what you are referring to, I must remind you.
The term "Experimental" in "Second Experimental Outpost" was not added arbitrarily.
@SilverTheDogfighter Antetus Alliance is my country
south wright, Antetus Alliance, Second Experimental Outpost.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Bro, can I use your red series? I want to film a scrapped plot from TSW.
Happy birthday! 🍰
Excellent idea bro, it only needs a few tiny little adjustments to become practical, and I already have a solution ready.
@Graingy For absurd: Art of the Absurd, Absurdist Art
@Graingy this one
… I can't find this plane on your homepage, which is strange.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover em… After some reflection, I want to emphasize that my question is We will conduct a landing operation against them.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I have a question now—since it's a mobile island, will we need to conduct an amphibious assault in the future?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover "They may however bring ships or amphibious vehicles."
what ship?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ok, so
Project Aurelia
A question: Do they need airports?
To be honest, the current Antetus Alliance is both suited and struggling to counter them, because advanced FT missiles are not cheap. If they had airports, the LF-12A would make them understand the core of air superiority theory. But...
...
Perhaps that experimental project needs to be launched ahead of schedule.
@CenturyAerospace Good point
Since there are some heavily modified missiles or some FT missiles in SP1, I wonder if this will have an impact in the multiplayer mode of SP2.
@KPLBall Original challenge? Which?
Anyway, I think I will join
so what is it?
@SPWithLizzie @BOSSentinel First, I want to confirm the event—Bos, because 444 did not follow his instructions within the specified time, carried out the strike as threatened using a private company's vessel carrying a large number of civilians. However, the intensity of the strike was too extreme, or the action itself was too radical, which provoked dissatisfaction from others. The situation even escalated to the point of threatening to blow up the vessel, and then it fell into the dilemma of how to define this vessel. Is that correct?
@SPWithLizzie @MetallicBeef6572 @BOSSentinel Sorry, but regarding the "paramilitary organization," I have some thoughts, so I would like to request permission to join the discussion. If anyone disagrees, I will withdraw.
what improve do you want
Bro, you did a pretty good job. It would be even better if the bullet trajectory could be optimized (or maybe this is a unique feature? Since it’s hard to predict).
@SPWithLizzie Little tips not about being cool, but about practical stuff.
The versatility of this method goes far beyond RP.
Bro ended up like this largely due to a lack of experience. When others condemn you from the moral high ground, the important thing is not to refute them but to seize the high ground yourself.
For example, in another RP: M-War II, I got into a heated argument with a participant who was competing with me for Wright Island. When I threatened to attack the military port with anti-ship missiles:
He: "We are hosting a routine festival on our warships—you would be attacking civilians!"
Me: "The cunning enemy is using civilians as human shields."
@SPWithLizzie I feel like♡
And for that person who agreed with you saying
@SPWithLizzie important?
@AviationLoverGEEK444 I want to be an audience.
@MetallicBeef6572 just audience
bro just made War II 🤣
Sorry but i can't help you cause i don know how to do too
@RepublicofKomi Trust me, you won't be able to maintain stability.
If you're referring to the issue of the aircraft slightly rolling on its own, I can tell you-there's an overall offset along the X-axis in your part assembly. You'll need to identify which specific part is causing the problem by testing through sequential deletion of components.
Unfortunately,I don't have time to assist with testing right now, as I'm currently working on a special project for the 93rd Anniversary Military Parade.
@RepublicofKomi em… Sorry but that's another one
@TheUltimatePlaneLover This fighter would have appeared in M-War II, its assembly completed three months ago.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Today, there will also be one fighter jet making an appearance.
@RepublicofKomi ?
@RepublicofKomi sorry but no time, bro. I am designing three breakthrough weapons for an important occasion
@RepublicofKomi no, that thing will use a lot of parts.
@RepublicofKomi Hey bro, long time to see
No thoughts, really. I just want to join the game as an ordinary person. Then elbow-strike every troublemaker with an LT-12A FT air-to-air missile.
.… Wait, what do you mean they're using LT-12As too?