What about a few videos that kind of compare/contrast SP and Juno? I've seen quite a few people who are confused why Jundroo is doing SP2 instead of just adding more airplane stuff to Juno, and I think some videos that explain some of the core differences in concept and scope could be interesting.
Personally not a fan of icebergs that involve community controversies so I'll not suggest any of those. Anyway...
The removed parts should definitely be bumped down to level 3; if landing in the ice base is level 2 then the removed parts are substantially less well-known.
3D printing is probably somewhere in tier 4/5 now, it's also been gone for a long time.
I'd bump the kraken up to tier 4 personally since it is fairly well known, but difficult to find if you don't know where you're going. Honestly it should be above the Brown Pearl if anything.
The pyramid should definitely be tier 5.
Heck maybe I should make my own that's just focused on stuff within the game itself actually.
@Graingy If the blueprints are drawn on a pride flag then they are not in compliance with most typical engineering drawing standards and therefore are likely inaccurate.
Generally a good time to play is when you are both awake and not currently doing (or expected to be doing) something else. This may vary from user to user.
You could try adding a smooth() command, i.e.: smooth(clamp(VTOL, -1, 0), x) where x represents the speed (e.g. set it to 0.1 for it to move at 1/10 of the normal speed). I've never tried this on control surfaces but theoretically it should work fine.
Well, it was announced less than two weeks ago and currently the only publicly available information that could be used for hype is the reveal trailer, which was mainly designed to appeal to existing players anyway. Extensive advertising at this point wouldn't help.
Also probably because the Nordschleife mod has been posted for over a year whereas this one has been posted for only a few days; some people don't check the mods page super frequently. 44 upvotes in two days is pretty good, all things considered.
Q: What will happen to SimplePlanes.com when SimplePlanes 2 comes out?
A: SimplePlanes.com will continue to serve the community as it does now, and we will expand its capabilities to support uploads from SimplePlanes 2.
this is like a wikipedia page that's been translated through three languages except it's also been put through text-to-speech and speech-to-text a few times in between
Go through and delete whatever you don't need, as well as removing yourself from any mailing lists that signing up for various accounts may have put you on.
@Graingy allow me to introduce.....
+1my printer which cannot do colors
language
+1What about a few videos that kind of compare/contrast SP and Juno? I've seen quite a few people who are confused why Jundroo is doing SP2 instead of just adding more airplane stuff to Juno, and I think some videos that explain some of the core differences in concept and scope could be interesting.
+6Methinks you should pin the comments that you want people to vote on
Also it actually does fly pretty decently once fixed.
I'm honestly more curious as to why the rotor hub disappeared than what you actually did.
+2- Either b or c, though I don't mind having a gyro on an activation group as a backup emergency stabilizer for if (when) things go wrong.
- Personally I'd prefer c. If the engine throttle is controlled automatically, controlling collective with the throttle input just makes sense.
+2@GabrielFangster70 Welp, didn't realize this was just an afternoon project, so I wasn't able to add stuff to yours.
Personally not a fan of icebergs that involve community controversies so I'll not suggest any of those. Anyway...
The removed parts should definitely be bumped down to level 3; if landing in the ice base is level 2 then the removed parts are substantially less well-known.
3D printing is probably somewhere in tier 4/5 now, it's also been gone for a long time.
I'd bump the kraken up to tier 4 personally since it is fairly well known, but difficult to find if you don't know where you're going. Honestly it should be above the Brown Pearl if anything.
The pyramid should definitely be tier 5.
Heck maybe I should make my own that's just focused on stuff within the game itself actually.
You can't. Forums are meant to be posts where you discuss things with the community, which... necessitates them being public.
+2@Graingy If the blueprints are drawn on a pride flag then they are not in compliance with most typical engineering drawing standards and therefore are likely inaccurate.
+1Easier to see relative to the drawings, which are usually black on white.
+1When the cannon is set to fire that quickly, the game can't play the fire sound for each round because of how close together they would be.
+2Generally a good time to play is when you are both awake and not currently doing (or expected to be doing) something else. This may vary from user to user.
Your friend had what his game site?
Tagging at the end is valid but feels wrong for some reason.
+2@TheMouse
You could try adding a smooth() command, i.e.:
smooth(clamp(VTOL, -1, 0), x)where x represents the speed (e.g. set it to 0.1 for it to move at 1/10 of the normal speed). I've never tried this on control surfaces but theoretically it should work fine.Link to the game's Steam page
+1(it's really good, y'all should check it out)
TU-22M?
@Monarchii @Graingy I cannot think of a response to either of those so uhhh... neat.
+2Definitely tag me on this, that's a beautiful build!
what does "fufufu" mean
no
@Graingy am I missing an eyebrow?
@Graingy there goes my what
+1you didn't finish
Ooh very nice, the updated materials look great!
+1Yep, this is a bug that showed up after the last update.
+1@Speedhunter I mean, a fox is just a cat running on dog hardware so it counts either way.
+2Well, it was announced less than two weeks ago and currently the only publicly available information that could be used for hype is the reveal trailer, which was mainly designed to appeal to existing players anyway. Extensive advertising at this point wouldn't help.
+1Works fine for me
sledgehammer
+1Also probably because the Nordschleife mod has been posted for over a year whereas this one has been posted for only a few days; some people don't check the mods page super frequently. 44 upvotes in two days is pretty good, all things considered.
+2The first one I think would just be acrophobia, while the second could be megalophobia.
Q: What will happen to SimplePlanes.com when SimplePlanes 2 comes out?
+1A: SimplePlanes.com will continue to serve the community as it does now, and we will expand its capabilities to support uploads from SimplePlanes 2.
Usually it's because the post was removed because it broke one or more of the website rules.
+9Happy birthday!
yo dawg I heard you like MiGs
so I put a MiG on your MiG so you can MiG while you MiG
doot doot
@FlyingPatriot Sounds good, I'll be asleep then probably (it's 2am for me lol) but I'll get back to you in the morning.
YOOOOO
I can do some screenshots if you want, but I don't have shaders or anything though.
so amazing that you added a few extra letters :)
+3I totally agree though, lasagna is really good
this is like a wikipedia page that's been translated through three languages except it's also been put through text-to-speech and speech-to-text a few times in between
+2"I'm done playing games"
+1proceeds to play the game
Go through and delete whatever you don't need, as well as removing yourself from any mailing lists that signing up for various accounts may have put you on.
+3@KitsuneassemblylinesKAL Thanks! I might have to get that book at some point, looks interesting!
*yro'ue
+1What book is that?
Counterpoint, the 1900D is a forehead plane whereas the C is not.
smooth
+1@AndrewGarrison Isn't that what the caffeine is for?