@Adithecat3459
Less pixel camo will look terrible imo.
I'd rather go camo or no camo, no thing in between.
But you can just delete some of the camo parts if you so desire.
@BogdanX
Thanks.
Actually I have tried doing the text thing like you said but sadly the text can't be affected by smoothness and metallic so it'll just look flat so I drop the idea.
And about flaps, I think it have too little effect to be noticeable, it enable the plane to pull a tiny bit more g and will bend the wing up a bit when deployed at high speed but yeah... I don't really know how it should work so I just trust SP physics and use SP control surfaces for flaps.
@V
Glad to know that, thanks again.
If you don't mind, how this camera work anyway, I'm assuming you move along with the camera and if that the case is it make the control harder or anything?
@AndrewGarrison
@V
I haven't finished my plane with 1.11 parts yet but I've been tinkering with said camera concept for a year now.
You can test just the g-camera right now by using my newer build such as my Raptor or this old and mobile friendly MiG-15.
@AndrewGarrison
I have some question about VR.
I've made my plane's camera not stationary, it affected by g-force to simulate the g acting upon pilot, the question is will the VR pilot move along with the camera or the camera will be just used for initializing VR pilot position.
@Whymakeaname
+1dunno
@VicRattlehead
+1There are 2 parts, code in the label and the actual calculation in the new variable window.
Quick suggestion: move aiming rotators forward to be just inside the ball so the ball will rotate in the socket like how it should have been.
+2@WojakArgento
Go ahead my big fans, I approved as always.
@klm747klm747
Yeah, that has been bugging my mind too, it'd be nice if you have a better solution.
@Neruneten21
It's technically a helicopter.
@IndianAce @Vikyandrianrrr
idk, maybe?
@ItsHighbraker2912
I'm not a robot although sometimes I talk like one lol.
@Hihihihihihhgh
1200 km/h IAS if I remember correctly.
@Kennneth
Thanks.
I'm glad it turned out fine in VR since I have no VR gear to test with.
@S3Viking
Thanks
@Victor4LoneSoldier
+1I can't remember the exact model but they called it second stage engine with serrated nozzle.
@Focks
lol
No going back now.
@Deadeye4827089057
yea
Back when I'm still learning FT.
@Ian_Yashima
Thanks
@DrenasPort
I tried the text thing and it failed lol.
It can't have any material, just plain color so it'll look terrible imo.
"That's hawttt"
-Diloph-
@Randomfamilyburden
I'm thinking about it but no promise.
@DrenasPort
Hmm...
Cockpit alone is 100 parts.
Impossibru!!
@T8flightcrafts
Happy flying.
@MrShenanigans
The cat said it all lol.
@Adithecat3459
Less pixel camo will look terrible imo.
I'd rather go camo or no camo, no thing in between.
But you can just delete some of the camo parts if you so desire.
@BND1
I always make the same style of PSM, just my previous Ace Combat crafts have higher thrust than this lol.
Carrier shot was beautiful indeed.
+1@Random04
Hmm...
I think he might not know.
@FRANCOIS2010
I might be.
@MABUR
Maybe, I'll just wait until we get more information.
@TheNightmareCompany
SP website forced me to.
I was as surprised as you are.
@BogdanX
Thanks.
Actually I have tried doing the text thing like you said but sadly the text can't be affected by smoothness and metallic so it'll just look flat so I drop the idea.
And about flaps, I think it have too little effect to be noticeable, it enable the plane to pull a tiny bit more g and will bend the wing up a bit when deployed at high speed but yeah... I don't really know how it should work so I just trust SP physics and use SP control surfaces for flaps.
@Nerfaddict
lol
I hope so.
@LarryTad @CrimsonOnigiri
+1Thanks.
@X99STRIKER
So fast lol.
YEET.
Just a tiny bit more tags list:
+1@Astro12 @Aviator01
A little more tags list:
@CaptainSquadronLeaderX @one @Saberyt1
Even more tags list:
@MrShenanigans @RYZ3NCHR1ST3NS3N @MABUR
Some more tags list:
+1@FabioGalvao5679 @winterro @Beefy
More tags list:
@Noname918181 @DEADSHOT14 @joaol
Tags list:
@Katyusha1 @Default4 @Nerfaddict
It's finised!!!
It's finised!!!
It's finised!!!
@V
Glad to know that, thanks again.
If you don't mind, how this camera work anyway, I'm assuming you move along with the camera and if that the case is it make the control harder or anything?
@NotNiki I have just 2 build above 1000 parts, that's the wrong guyfolks you are mentioning lol.
@ItsHighbraker2912
Only other American jet I made is the Sabre so...
Bully the Sabre it is!!!!
@V
Ok.
Thanks for testing that for me since I have no VR gear.
@BlinIndustry
+5Don't be sad, that's how I learn FT.
Tinkering with other's build is the best way to learn.
@MattDawger
My WIP SU-57.
@AndrewGarrison
@V
I haven't finished my plane with 1.11 parts yet but I've been tinkering with said camera concept for a year now.
You can test just the g-camera right now by using my newer build such as my Raptor or this old and mobile friendly MiG-15.
@MSCworldXD
In my SP page.
@AndrewGarrison
+1I have some question about VR.
I've made my plane's camera not stationary, it affected by g-force to simulate the g acting upon pilot, the question is will the VR pilot move along with the camera or the camera will be just used for initializing VR pilot position.