@keiyronelleavgeek566 I'm not sure if the Tumour is a sterile universe or not. There's also the factor that it's a pocket dimension, which may influence things.
I dunno, I'm not an expert in universe formation.
The forums do have tags to be filtered by. Issue is, you can either get all or one.
Having more specific tags, and the ability to disable them individually (either simply by not searching, or blacklisting any post with it in the case of multitagged posts) would definitely make the site more usable.
@32 Huh. Neat.
The build of the Graingy site I was able to nab doesn't have any active scripts, just pages, except the Products and Career tabs. Those don't seem to work.
@THEOKPILOT Ah, I see. What about the chat?
The games are the impressive part to me. I don't know a lick of Java script.
Perhaps I should try to learn something...
Most definitely not. The Graingy website is a business website, whereas yours is, at a glance, a personal/novelty website.
I assume the poor design was intentional, though. The functional features look much more interesting.
@dekanii It just lacks creativity, the way I see it. People can do as they do, but, idk, seems like people would be better off making their own ideas?
Dissent3R, go to hell. For someone who's first line in their bio is "Build to your heart's desire", you sure have a stick high up your arse.
If it's not dogshit then it's probably a lie. That or they got a very good teacher.
Or they're one of those folk who read every textbook they find before they try something.
Sending museum exhibits into battle would be quite in character.
I'd be more afraid of the IS-7, personally. Not because it's especially powerful compared to modern vehicles, rather because there is no way that demon was forged by the hands of man.
@Boeing727200F Anything can be art so long as it's created with purpose.
Someone leaving their shoe in an art gallery so people will photograph it is, indeed, art, even if not part of the gallery's intended exhibit.
@Axartar I dunno, I feel like that’d remove the egalitarian aspect of points. Anyone can get them, and they’re in infinite supply. All they measure is how much “happiness”, for lack of a better word, a person has brought to the site. They don’t have too much meaning, accordingly, so having twice someone else’s points doesn’t mean much on its own.
Bringing in another form of reward on the face of a profile (therefore, not tucked away into a relevant craft’s page) would kinda destroy this. The only way to get one would be to beat a lot of other people, many of whom have waayyyy too much time on their hands to place individual bolts on a fuselage.
Points are interchangeable, such a badge would not be. We don’t need a sign saying “I’m better than you” on the front of someone’s account.
While I have no interest in joining, would those points be attributed to the craft in the points page? It'd make the most sense that way.
... Hmm, maybe the site needs, like, a Big Upvote feature. Just a comically large upvote in the list.
What if I want a bigger boom on the left side?
+1Muskets won't buy themselves.
+1Need pelts for the trading post.
@keiyronelleavgeek566 Yeah. Tumour.
+1@RB107 I retract my statement.
+1If you want to know it for next week, take the current count reduce to zero.
oh now it loads
+1Change the "s" in "scrap" to an ""
RELAX steelworker, it's called DOODOOMAN HUMOUR.
+1@32
OH MY GOODNESS THEY CUT OFF YOUR PICKLE
+1@keiyronelleavgeek566 I'm not sure if the Tumour is a sterile universe or not. There's also the factor that it's a pocket dimension, which may influence things.
+1I dunno, I'm not an expert in universe formation.
The forums do have tags to be filtered by. Issue is, you can either get all or one.
+1Having more specific tags, and the ability to disable them individually (either simply by not searching, or blacklisting any post with it in the case of multitagged posts) would definitely make the site more usable.
ponty
+1@LunarEclipseSP I stand by my belief in the name Jundroohickeys. If not for the stock craft, then for Jundroo’s vehicle games in general.
+1@keiyronelleavgeek566 Fictional? You confuse being in another universe with the concept of fiction!
+1@THEOKPILOT Aw that sucks :(
@32 Huh. Neat.
+1The build of the Graingy site I was able to nab doesn't have any active scripts, just pages, except the Products and Career tabs. Those don't seem to work.
Anyhow, looks cool. Idk why its red but it adds to the menace factor.
+1@THEOKPILOT Ah, I see. What about the chat?
+1The games are the impressive part to me. I don't know a lick of Java script.
Perhaps I should try to learn something...
@THEOKPILOT Did you write it all yourself, or find stock code?
+1There's Rick Astley inside, isn't there?
+1There is no way in hell I trust that chatroom to not steal my identity, though.
+1Most definitely not. The Graingy website is a business website, whereas yours is, at a glance, a personal/novelty website.
+1I assume the poor design was intentional, though. The functional features look much more interesting.
The timing of this is actually quite funny.
+1@dabestsock Neither.
+1Ooooh red deck pretty
+1@AirMaster2478 Troll detected lol
+1It's gotten spottier.
+1Distant sounds of a drum set dying in pain
Nice crechur
+1Hi.
+1I don't recognise you but hi
I've heard.
+1The contrast between the realistic car bodies and the orange stand is rather amusing.
+1I thought it was... isn't it?
+1Isn't 3 already intended?
+1AH! NEW THING!
+1Slow clap
+1Remember to abort the next one, good god
+1@THEOKPILOT There's this one old Soviet film about robots controlled with a saxophone.
+1Haven't seen it, but it's on Wikipedia last I checked.
@dekanii It just lacks creativity, the way I see it. People can do as they do, but, idk, seems like people would be better off making their own ideas?
+1Dissent3R, go to hell. For someone who's first line in their bio is "Build to your heart's desire", you sure have a stick high up your arse.
I've seen worse.
+1I've seen worse.
+1I will never understand how you art people do it.
+1If it's not dogshit then it's probably a lie. That or they got a very good teacher.
+1Or they're one of those folk who read every textbook they find before they try something.
Sending museum exhibits into battle would be quite in character.
+1I'd be more afraid of the IS-7, personally. Not because it's especially powerful compared to modern vehicles, rather because there is no way that demon was forged by the hands of man.
Long cockpit
+1I feel violated
+1@Boeing727200F Anything can be art so long as it's created with purpose.
+1Someone leaving their shoe in an art gallery so people will photograph it is, indeed, art, even if not part of the gallery's intended exhibit.
@Axartar I dunno, I feel like that’d remove the egalitarian aspect of points. Anyone can get them, and they’re in infinite supply. All they measure is how much “happiness”, for lack of a better word, a person has brought to the site. They don’t have too much meaning, accordingly, so having twice someone else’s points doesn’t mean much on its own.
+1Bringing in another form of reward on the face of a profile (therefore, not tucked away into a relevant craft’s page) would kinda destroy this. The only way to get one would be to beat a lot of other people, many of whom have waayyyy too much time on their hands to place individual bolts on a fuselage.
Points are interchangeable, such a badge would not be. We don’t need a sign saying “I’m better than you” on the front of someone’s account.
Heh.
+1Heheh.
Yeah, that’ll happen.
To the trenches with him
+1While I have no interest in joining, would those points be attributed to the craft in the points page? It'd make the most sense that way.
+1... Hmm, maybe the site needs, like, a Big Upvote feature. Just a comically large upvote in the list.
@keiyronelleavgeek566 Um. No.
+1It's a land vehicle.
@keiyronelleavgeek566 It isn't meant to?
+1No. Not allowed.
+1