Sounds like custom landing gear to me.
A fairly simple one, that is.
There's already an answer which is probably way better than anything I could bring, though.
Maybe consider using two fuselage stacked on top of each other?
I am going to be frank, this thing is a visual abomination. Needs substantial work on that front.
@StockPlanesRemastered Hm.
Try giving a propeller a massive cord (dozens of meters, at least), and align the blade with a rotator above it.
Set the pitch control to be controlled by VTOL (or throttle), set a text block to output the VTOL/Throttle as a number. Should be more precise in the case of throttle.
Since the chord is enormous it should be more precise and easier to match the rotator angle to.
Connect the rotator to trim and connect trim to a similar text block as to VTOL. Rotator should have a very long beam connected.
Load, set VTOL to 100%. Align the rotator's beam to the leading edge of the propeller blade.
Compare max rotator angle to the percent trim and work out the angle. Unless Rotators have an angle variable output, in which case disregard trim and just use that.
That should give the angle for pitch.
In an excessively complicated format, I'm sure.
@THEOKPILOT Neither.
I don't know what BFDI is and frankly I don't want to. Seems like a churning mass of unrestrained internet autism from my standing. The kind I really don't like.
That looks nice
That movie has done unfathomable damage to the collective psyche as of present.
+1I need to see it.
Hm. Makes sense. What are you trying to achieve?
@Skykid028 wdym?
@Planemodder1911 I can't remember the variable off the top of my head, but perhaps try something to the effect of YawRate>[Your desired rate here]?
+1As in yaw rate? Degrees per second?
@Skykid028 I suppose I'll have to dissect that when I get the chance.
Oh but where's the unimpressive 125kg of TNT?
@Skykid028 Okay but like how. Some FT property on the rotor itself? Separate rotors each connected to a rotator?
Dang, how that work?
Lovely weather we're having, isn't it?
That's my impression of someone who does large text for everything they say for some reason.
Vale?
Just as the ancestors intended.
Copy-pasted the exponent?
@IFVuser This is the most BS game of bingo
+2Sounds like custom landing gear to me.
A fairly simple one, that is.
There's already an answer which is probably way better than anything I could bring, though.
Ah, yes, of course. Trading flints for fur pelts.
@32 Ah
Bonjour.
Can't say I recognize you, but welcome back I guess.
@32 File extension?
sezur
+1neat
Does it rotate?
But where else will we source our unfiltered internet derangement-
+1Oh, right.
Reddit.
grats
+1Mein gott
+1You could at least hyperlink it, yeah?
Uhhhhhh okay then. Good luck I guess.
Heh. Nice.
Wack
Posts that aren’t public. Usually used for this kind of thing to avoid clogging up the site with marginally altered WIPs.
So… why is this one an abstract placeholder?
This would be parody if it were remotely realistic. This isn’t.
This is essentially slander.
What the hell. Seriously.
@Boeing727200F I was busy :(
Maybe consider using two fuselage stacked on top of each other?
I am going to be frank, this thing is a visual abomination. Needs substantial work on that front.
That's an intake?
No.
+1Only god can help this thing
+2@StockPlanesRemastered Hm.
Try giving a propeller a massive cord (dozens of meters, at least), and align the blade with a rotator above it.
Set the pitch control to be controlled by VTOL (or throttle), set a text block to output the VTOL/Throttle as a number. Should be more precise in the case of throttle.
Since the chord is enormous it should be more precise and easier to match the rotator angle to.
Connect the rotator to trim and connect trim to a similar text block as to VTOL. Rotator should have a very long beam connected.
Load, set VTOL to 100%. Align the rotator's beam to the leading edge of the propeller blade.
Compare max rotator angle to the percent trim and work out the angle. Unless Rotators have an angle variable output, in which case disregard trim and just use that.
That should give the angle for pitch.
In an excessively complicated format, I'm sure.
@TheMouse drat
Who up jlostling their gavelings
Released 2019.
@WinsWings ?
Skletal
@TheMouse Was that a no?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Couple hours.
@THEOKPILOT Easy enough to avoid, fortunately.
Unlike the endless piles of degeneracy courtesy of mankind.
Souplane being an example.
@THEOKPILOT Neither.
I don't know what BFDI is and frankly I don't want to. Seems like a churning mass of unrestrained internet autism from my standing. The kind I really don't like.
banamna
+1