@Boeing727200F Obviously, passengers would need to go somewhere.
Wifi is a given, this is the 21st century.
By "entire" do you mean including within crew spaces/among the gas bags themselves?
@JSTQ Again, you can get good supply by ordering variety.
The prices are to make it worth it to us to go through the effort. We wouldn't give the option if we weren't willing, it just isn't super great for the customer a lot of the time.
F-71s aren't the highest demand model, so we have a few already in storage.
@JSTQ A large order at that timeframe would roughly double the price.
I'd suggest ordering from multiple different models, since that would require less of an industrial effort to supply. Don't need to convert lines to maximize production.
You need to appreciate the kind of effort needed to build a fighter jet in two days after order.
Y'know, if that's considered "normal" there, that place needs one of two things:
A) A cleansing
B) Eradication
Absolutely none of what SGB is remotely acceptable in a developed society, and the trends in whatever "community" they may be from are nowhere near a valid excuse.
This isn't something you merely apologize for an go on like normal after, you better do some serious self-reflection on how the hell you ever got a point in your life you figured that was acceptable.
@JSTQ An early F-225 will go for $20 million USD. This is a heavy fighter originating in the 1960s. It can carry a reasonably heavy missile armament, has smooth handling, and has two rotary cannons. It has a crew of two and is designed for CATOBAR.
The F-71 will go for around $5 million USD. This is an ultralight fighter from the 1970s. It is lightly armed in terms of missiles and avionics, though has a reasonably punchy gun armament (lack of ammunition notwithstanding). It has a single crew member in its cramped cockpit. It is VTOL.
Do consider the size difference.
15.2m vs. 9.9m wingspan.
19.4m vs. 10.2m length.
5.6m vs. 3.6m tall.
I fail to see how that would help?
Parts need to be custom-designed for a given model, and the way I see it if you didn’t make it yourself, and it’s any greater than a trim, you shouldn’t be using it.
This incredibly short time scale is the kicker. No way to work within that unless you already have significant experience in this type of aircraft (and time to devote to SP).
In any case, the closest Graingy aircraft to fitting this criteria are not currently approved for sale in the Tumour.
Can’t even get GHF-79As in there, let alone recent models.
Though I could imagine something topside...
@Boeing727200F Aerodynamically unfeasible.
Compare to LZ-129.
@Boeing727200F No.
@Boeing727200F I see.
I find your lack of faith disturbing.
@Boeing727200F You're confusing me.
+1@Boeing727200F Please, we're trying to run a legitimate enterprise here.
What do you mean by "note those"?
@Boeing727200F Obviously, passengers would need to go somewhere.
Wifi is a given, this is the 21st century.
By "entire" do you mean including within crew spaces/among the gas bags themselves?
@Boeing727200F Ignoring for the moment that'd you'd be going nowhere near such a vessel, what sorts of amenities would you suggest? Routes?
@Boeing727200F I'll chase you off with a broom and spray bottle myself if need be.
@Boeing727200F Banned in advance for reasons of global security.
I vibe with this
+1I'm pretty sure Chad is already meant to do this stuff, unless I heard/saw wrong.
+1Diesel cold start sounds
+1But this isn't a new idea.
??????????
So it's a joke post?
Isn't this literally just Chad?
+1Or is this a joke post?
What the hell. Seriously.
@JSTQ Mhm.
@JSTQ Aight. That will be a few weeks, I'm afraid.
I'd say, eh, beginning of June?
@JSTQ Again, you can get good supply by ordering variety.
The prices are to make it worth it to us to go through the effort. We wouldn't give the option if we weren't willing, it just isn't super great for the customer a lot of the time.
F-71s aren't the highest demand model, so we have a few already in storage.
neat
+1I really ain't doin too hot
@JSTQ A large order at that timeframe would roughly double the price.
I'd suggest ordering from multiple different models, since that would require less of an industrial effort to supply. Don't need to convert lines to maximize production.
You need to appreciate the kind of effort needed to build a fighter jet in two days after order.
what else can i possibly say
@JSTQ Oh, wait, within two days?
Price goes up enormously on those timetables.
@HuskyDynamics01 I wouldn't touch a single surface anyways
I see...
This looks interesting.
+1Like a large rock landed on its back.
Do you have a lemon shark?
+1Y'know, if that's considered "normal" there, that place needs one of two things:
+2A) A cleansing
B) Eradication
Absolutely none of what SGB is remotely acceptable in a developed society, and the trends in whatever "community" they may be from are nowhere near a valid excuse.
This isn't something you merely apologize for an go on like normal after, you better do some serious self-reflection on how the hell you ever got a point in your life you figured that was acceptable.
@HuskyDynamics01 Thanks Oboe Wan Bonobo
gug-what?
@JSTQ An early F-225 will go for $20 million USD. This is a heavy fighter originating in the 1960s. It can carry a reasonably heavy missile armament, has smooth handling, and has two rotary cannons. It has a crew of two and is designed for CATOBAR.
The F-71 will go for around $5 million USD. This is an ultralight fighter from the 1970s. It is lightly armed in terms of missiles and avionics, though has a reasonably punchy gun armament (lack of ammunition notwithstanding). It has a single crew member in its cramped cockpit. It is VTOL.
Do consider the size difference.
15.2m vs. 9.9m wingspan.
19.4m vs. 10.2m length.
5.6m vs. 3.6m tall.
F-225 is naval-compatible, off the top of my head.
+1@JSTQ I’d have to check the catalogue. Unfortunately I’m rather short on time myself. Remind me later, yeah?
@Rb2h connected?!?!?
+1Illuminati confirmed!!!!!
Everything is always unique anyhow.
Seems I work different to the people you talk to.
@Subsere not your call
@Scrugy51 big log
+1@Scrugy51 big log
+1@Scrugy51 metabolizing
+1@Scrugy51 oh my bad
@Scrugy51 and so the cycle repeats.
@Scrugy51 well well well, look who’s alive for the next 20 seconds.
+1I fail to see how that would help?
Parts need to be custom-designed for a given model, and the way I see it if you didn’t make it yourself, and it’s any greater than a trim, you shouldn’t be using it.
This incredibly short time scale is the kicker. No way to work within that unless you already have significant experience in this type of aircraft (and time to devote to SP).
+2In any case, the closest Graingy aircraft to fitting this criteria are not currently approved for sale in the Tumour.
Can’t even get GHF-79As in there, let alone recent models.
Time.
+1Fack
+1