@SupremeDorian Out of curiosity, any word on how many faces the fuselage is going to have when rounded? In SP I think a circular fuselage has like 24 faces, which can become noticeable at large scales. On top of that, it doesn't match the hemisphere (or probably other parts), making them mesh poorly.
Will there be the option to change the number, such as making a larger fuselage more round?
@YarisHatchback not exactly uncommon.
@LunarEclipseSP Loving the implication that playing SP is incompatible with having a life lol. Though to be fair, complex (read: competitive) things in this game are ludicrously time consuming.
@jamesPLANESii that would be useful too.
I can say from experience, however, that finding old forums is definitely a pain in the ass and I’d like have a way to quickly mark and classify while making as opposed to having to always immediately hyperlink on a master post somewhere else, which is tedious.
I see no reason to not include the originals as well.
That is, the VR and the first gen fuselage ones.
The ORIGINAL original block forms (like the P-51 and the slightly updated block P-51 used in the tutorial flights) should stay as sort of esoteric easter eggs on the site.
@Graingy Still, I'm trying to avoid everything I can.
Maybe actually say what it's spoiler for, too. Impossible to know currently unless you click it. Not super helpful.
This would devolve into bickering over popularity so damn fast.
Terrible idea, honestly. At least in an "official"/centralized manner.
While I can see how some may find it appealing, issues include:
-People prioritizing becoming "important" enough to get a page.
-Possible inability for someone to remove their own page if they want to leave the site permanently (even worse if information about them is spread across many pages retelling the same information for different topics).
-Bias and defamation, where pages would be vandalized to make someone look bad (even if throwaway alts are blocked with point minimums, more minor but insidious changes could still be damaging if they aren't picked up on as false/exaggerations/things that should just be left in the past).
-Probably more things that don't come to mind in the moment.
Honestly I think the forums need a rework.
While I've suggested an improve tag feature in the past (whitelisting/blacklisting from a multi-select menu, etc.), I think a "wiki" type page could be helpful. Though devoted people can do that already with unlisteds and forums (though slow due to [admittedly understandable for technical reasons] post limits, with forum clogging also being an issue), a type editable to multiple people could be handy. Being able to add new pages without needing an unlisted craft file being uploaded or clogging forums would be useful.
Note that this would be done entirely by individuals/small groups of players, not by the site itself/Jundroo or the community at large.
For example, a specific RP could set up a wiki edited by approved members. Either they'd work collectively, or the wiki's creator (presumably the head of the RP) would delegate each member their respective page(s) to work with.
In short, a central wiki would be a terrible idea, but a site wiki creation feature (which wouldn't really add any strain on the servers which doesn't already exist) would be very, very helpful.
At the very minimum, an unlisted/not shown in feed (but still on account) forum type (perhaps a different colour aside from green to tell apart) would suffice.
@SupremeDorian Question: you’ve said multiple times that the old wings are saying in the code, but will the UI for them remain? Or will all changes need to be done through Overload? Is Overload even staying, or is it being replaced with a Juno-like cheat menu? Hope it’s not, Overload’s open-endedness was convenient, if a bit slow to do for many parts.
What century is that thing from!?
What the hell am I looking at
Hm, can't recall the name.
@ToroInoue Having no physics is your main source of fun? What?
Spoilers, man.
God.
@dolphlombardi Right, not enough soap.
How much you thinkin'?
@ToroInoue But why?
Younger than Minecraft.
Which is...
Uhhhhhhhhhh...
Oh no
Into the fiery orb with ye
+2oh fuck you were born after 2010 oh god oh god oh god oh shit oh fuck
@THEOKPILOT Heh.
@SupremeDorian Out of curiosity, any word on how many faces the fuselage is going to have when rounded? In SP I think a circular fuselage has like 24 faces, which can become noticeable at large scales. On top of that, it doesn't match the hemisphere (or probably other parts), making them mesh poorly.
Will there be the option to change the number, such as making a larger fuselage more round?
@ToroInoue What do you mean?
🧼
Who are you calling a Hor you brown fuck!??!
Okay, okay, no need to shout.
+3Remember that there are two legacy propellers.
@V Goddamnit.
+1Who's your manager?
Mug @LunarEclipseSP in an alley she has plenty.
+2Like, at least 128 and a k for some reason.
Mug @LunarEclipseSP in an alley she has plenty.
+2Like, at least 128 and a k for some reason.
Everyone has witness to history dipshit
+1it came free with your living in society
@RB107 🔨
+1@RB107 I'll shatter you.
+1@V AND NOBODY TOLD ME!?!?
+1@THEOKPILOT Not on the dot, right?
Anyhow, the talk of remembering older days of the internet threw me off lol
@YarisHatchback not exactly uncommon.
+3@LunarEclipseSP Loving the implication that playing SP is incompatible with having a life lol. Though to be fair, complex (read: competitive) things in this game are ludicrously time consuming.
@jamesPLANESii that would be useful too.
I can say from experience, however, that finding old forums is definitely a pain in the ass and I’d like have a way to quickly mark and classify while making as opposed to having to always immediately hyperlink on a master post somewhere else, which is tedious.
@EnglishGarden I have never once done dealings with a gravital
@LunarEclipseSP I see.
Someday I will horribly butcher it.
Also I may or may not want to eat a large number of rainbow forum posts.
Skittles.
Went back to the old PFP, eh?
Why so? Merely curious, figured you'd keep to the updated ones.
I see no reason to not include the originals as well.
That is, the VR and the first gen fuselage ones.
The ORIGINAL original block forms (like the P-51 and the slightly updated block P-51 used in the tutorial flights) should stay as sort of esoteric easter eggs on the site.
I cannot tell if you're thirteen or thirty three.
@SchmooveBrain Excuse me I'm a moron and tagged myself by accident.
Read below.
@Graingy Still, I'm trying to avoid everything I can.
Maybe actually say what it's spoiler for, too. Impossible to know currently unless you click it. Not super helpful.
Actually, I rather like this coloured forums idea....
This would devolve into bickering over popularity so damn fast.
Terrible idea, honestly. At least in an "official"/centralized manner.
While I can see how some may find it appealing, issues include:
-People prioritizing becoming "important" enough to get a page.
-Possible inability for someone to remove their own page if they want to leave the site permanently (even worse if information about them is spread across many pages retelling the same information for different topics).
-Bias and defamation, where pages would be vandalized to make someone look bad (even if throwaway alts are blocked with point minimums, more minor but insidious changes could still be damaging if they aren't picked up on as false/exaggerations/things that should just be left in the past).
-Probably more things that don't come to mind in the moment.
Honestly I think the forums need a rework.
While I've suggested an improve tag feature in the past (whitelisting/blacklisting from a multi-select menu, etc.), I think a "wiki" type page could be helpful. Though devoted people can do that already with unlisteds and forums (though slow due to [admittedly understandable for technical reasons] post limits, with forum clogging also being an issue), a type editable to multiple people could be handy. Being able to add new pages without needing an unlisted craft file being uploaded or clogging forums would be useful.
Note that this would be done entirely by individuals/small groups of players, not by the site itself/Jundroo or the community at large.
For example, a specific RP could set up a wiki edited by approved members. Either they'd work collectively, or the wiki's creator (presumably the head of the RP) would delegate each member their respective page(s) to work with.
In short, a central wiki would be a terrible idea, but a site wiki creation feature (which wouldn't really add any strain on the servers which doesn't already exist) would be very, very helpful.
+7At the very minimum, an unlisted/not shown in feed (but still on account) forum type (perhaps a different colour aside from green to tell apart) would suffice.
@SchmooveBrain Spoiler warning your links, yeah?
I've been too busy to play the new chapters.
Bitch please.
We won this challenge years ago.
wuh?
+1@EnglishGarden Not an Enstrarch
@Boeing727200F Legitimately, who? What nuclear pairing is in the conflict which I believe you're referring to?
Rather, who can shoot back?
@Boeing727200F With who?
@Halcyon215 I see
@SupremeDorian splendid. But no word on Overload?
@DeeganWithABazooka can’t patent that.
@SupremeDorian Question: you’ve said multiple times that the old wings are saying in the code, but will the UI for them remain? Or will all changes need to be done through Overload? Is Overload even staying, or is it being replaced with a Juno-like cheat menu? Hope it’s not, Overload’s open-endedness was convenient, if a bit slow to do for many parts.
@SupremeDorian makes sense.
@box that… makes sense actually. Explains how I got those points on SR.
@B1BLancer and then you change your username to some variation of Graingy.
Just, uh, beware the lawyers.
Nou
@DeeganWithABazooka I’ll pass