Alright, get a prop, go into overload, set the thickness/chord of the prop to 10 or more depending on your maximum desired depth.
You now have a propeller that works under water, congration.
Team defense fort 2
Call of duty: Garden warfare 3
Star wars 40k: rouge space marine
Lego star wars: revenge of mickey mouse
World of warthunder warplanes ships
Red alert redemtion 2: yuri's revenge
Fun fact: during operation aphrodite, a few B-17 were turned into remote controlled missiles. They couldn't take off on their own and thus pilots would take them up and then bail out. Despite carrying around twice the normal payload the effect on target was poor and certainly not worth the lives of the pilots who died during the bailout process.
Point is, reality is often more cursed than fiction, mostly because fiction has to be believable...
@rexzion 1:I turned off drag on nearly everything, 2: there was like only 3 other people with low part stuff because I asked if I could bring it in and they got low part count craft in preparation. The performance cost is still at like 4,500 though.
@Chancey21 what I was trying to say was if you could use a geared prop hooked up to gyrocopters main rotor to counter the downwind drift of the machine, think a kite that can stay in the air without a string attached. Propulsion would be provided by other means.
hmmmm, I wonder if instead of wheels I used a prop, like how a gyrocopter rotor works, but geared to another rotor to make an unsupported wind powered airship
A long time ago you commented on one of my builds that you were amazed at how fast it got popular, and I said you would get there eventually, well congratulations, you got there.
Overall this is a good plane, but that's just it, a plane. In my opinion this machine somewhat misses the mark on what a paraplane is. The PX-104 flies pretty well as a plane, however lacks the grace and the control technique of the original paraplane. Also using Asteroids style of rolling via wing warping is not suitable or at all realistic.
This build also has a few other areas that I find lacking, such as how the top cells are entirely rigid, and that the other cells have a limited range of movement.
_
14/20, it's a good effort and I like the 1920's aesthetic, however the machine has too many deficiencies related to how it flies to warrant the full reward.
@AN2Felllla yeah bruh don't you know that ejecting the exhaust into the crank case gets you 10 extra horsepower?
+2Features: aka the mods super spotlight that's way better than yours.
+2Aren't we able to do that with two floppy hinges?
+2Get in loser, we're going on a cross country journey to find who the hell asked...
+2yes officer this one right here
+2What do I do if the home key doesn't open the program?
+2"and zat was how i lost my medical license"
+2@Giby you could just take it off your self
+2Russian stealth technology (tm)
+2Alright, get a prop, go into overload, set the thickness/chord of the prop to 10 or more depending on your maximum desired depth.
+2You now have a propeller that works under water, congration.
Legitimately thought it was a plastic model at first.
+2Emergency goldfish delivery machine.
+2Watch this get removed in 5 minutes because T A R G E T P R A C T I C E.
+2Unwritten rule of MP #5,382: dont film the trolls, its what they want.
+2Team defense fort 2
+2Call of duty: Garden warfare 3
Star wars 40k: rouge space marine
Lego star wars: revenge of mickey mouse
World of warthunder warplanes ships
Red alert redemtion 2: yuri's revenge
Error 1000: critical existence failure
+2@spefyjerbf you think that I would forget something like that given that even the toilet lid opens?
+2Hello
+2@MintLynx yeah i remember that lol
+2@SimpleTechAndResearch also, there is the former dev rank.
+2Fun fact: during operation aphrodite, a few B-17 were turned into remote controlled missiles. They couldn't take off on their own and thus pilots would take them up and then bail out. Despite carrying around twice the normal payload the effect on target was poor and certainly not worth the lives of the pilots who died during the bailout process.
Point is, reality is often more cursed than fiction, mostly because fiction has to be believable...
+1Ok buddy schizo
+1They replaced generic dude avatar with a random shape generator, is big sad
+1Bruh
+1🗿
+1u ded?
+1This is cursed, make more
+1Clicky
@BeastHunter
+1@rexzion 1:I turned off drag on nearly everything, 2: there was like only 3 other people with low part stuff because I asked if I could bring it in and they got low part count craft in preparation. The performance cost is still at like 4,500 though.
+1@GalaxyMustache the last time someone asked me to make something it resulted in a downright awful build, so don't hold your breath.
+1one really long sliding canopy.
+1If not that then I'd go with 3
At what point will you stop, step back, and think to yourself "hey James, maybe this level of detail is a bit excessive"?
+1@Chancey21 what I was trying to say was if you could use a geared prop hooked up to gyrocopters main rotor to counter the downwind drift of the machine, think a kite that can stay in the air without a string attached. Propulsion would be provided by other means.
+1hmmmm, I wonder if instead of wheels I used a prop, like how a gyrocopter rotor works, but geared to another rotor to make an unsupported wind powered airship
+1hmmmm yes, bri'ish loco
+1"hey mommy, what's landing gear?"
+1A long time ago you commented on one of my builds that you were amazed at how fast it got popular, and I said you would get there eventually, well congratulations, you got there.
+1Hmmmmmmm...
+1Yes
Do you happen to be in need of a paddle steamer?
+1@GroBaleaze
+1hows this for a teaser?
-am alive
+110/10 year
Cease
+1military anything is overrated
+1Fixed that for ya
@asteroidbook345 then how have I not been banned for cursing, considering how often I use them?
+1Me: "dafuq dey doin over der?"
+1Let us mourne this tragic event with a single lower case f
+1.
.
.
.
.
f
Hey remember when we had the star rating system, and how people complained when their crappy white box got 1 star reviews.
+1K
+1@WiiWiiTheMini Make sure to remember that, it's useful for stoking the flames of internet drama. Which due to its absurdity should be laughed at.
+1Overall this is a good plane, but that's just it, a plane. In my opinion this machine somewhat misses the mark on what a paraplane is. The PX-104 flies pretty well as a plane, however lacks the grace and the control technique of the original paraplane. Also using Asteroids style of rolling via wing warping is not suitable or at all realistic.
+1This build also has a few other areas that I find lacking, such as how the top cells are entirely rigid, and that the other cells have a limited range of movement.
_
14/20, it's a good effort and I like the 1920's aesthetic, however the machine has too many deficiencies related to how it flies to warrant the full reward.