My god...this is amazing, I can't believe this is SimplePlanes. This deserves high end praise in my opinion.
I also love that cover of Imagine Dragons 'Warriors'.
@SuperSix
Can I just say that you make it sound like the 'wheels' themselves are used for propelling the craft of machine...which could not be further from the truth..
@CaptainRex123
That is actually really good. Very creative indeed.
(Just a question, but do you know what kind of aircraft they are in, or at least what type it is (Jet or prop)?)
Well, it happens because as you gain altitude, the air gets thinner. Props work better the closer you are to the ground as there is more air, meaning the engine can get more oxygen, but there is also more air for the propeller to use to push the plane (Same thing with helicopters).
Jets work better at a higher altitude as there is less drag and since they just suck in air and throw it out the back, they can operate at those altitudes with thin air (They have better fuel efficiency with the less drag as they can reduce power whilst still being able to go fast). When jets pass a certain altitude though, they start to lose speed as the air nearer to the edge of space starts to get too thin for the engines to keep outputting reasonable power, which lessens the higher you go.
(There also needs to be suitable air inlets so the jet engine(s) are getting enough air in the first place.)
A rocket engine, of course, doesn't need air, only fuel, to operate. Take the Me 163 Komet. Give it a ton more fuel, and it probably could reach the edge of space, or even space itself.
(Something else worth considering is that the higher you are, the more the aircraft relies on the engine(s) to keep it moving, so the higher you are, the more weight the engine(s) alone have to keep moving so that it stays in the air.)
Wouldn't that be like..contradicting though if you are wanting your points to reset to prove a point?
People would know who you are, so wouldn't it be better to just make a new account?
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
My idea on that is to give attention to the good builds made by non-platinum users, as Platinum users have 'experience', so they can always make good builds that get nice amounts of attention.
Does that make sense?
@OhBoy
Insert it into either a rotator or a default wing part with the appropriate control surface, depends on how you do your wings (Custom wings or just using the default wing parts)
@SimpleSimplePlanesTheUser
Just go to 'Manage Account' on your user page. Go to Gravatar using the link in the 'Manage Account' section (preferably open in a separate tab). If you don't have an account, make one. Then make sure you have the same email you used with SimplePlanes. Add a picture, save it, blah blah. Then when you are done with that, go back to SimplePlanes and click the 'Save' button (same place as the Gravatar link). Then just wait for a bit, your pfp will soon change.
I'm revising my design to give it two engines. I'm also using a Delta Wing (and before anyone tells me a Delta Wing isn't "1st Gen", go and look up the history of the Delta Wing, you would be surprised).
This may or may not make sense...
In my own opinion, he might want help from a 'professional', or the opinion of one. Because you're dealing with a car here and you need to learn how to do it yourself, that's my best guess as to why he wants you to "call a different shop".
@mikoyanster
Can I just say that aircraft like the F-86, Mig-15 and so on are more 2nd Gen than 1st gen (Although I could be proven wrong if you can tell me otherwise).
Flying wing
@Maroon
I've been using that mod for ages...
My god...this is amazing, I can't believe this is SimplePlanes. This deserves high end praise in my opinion.
I also love that cover of Imagine Dragons 'Warriors'.
@SuperSix
Can I just say that you make it sound like the 'wheels' themselves are used for propelling the craft of machine...which could not be further from the truth..
@CaptainRex123
Go for it anyway, all my Aircraft on this site are fictional, yet I work them into real-life like they actually existed IRL.
@CaptainRex123
Wait no, I'm not being Ignorant, BA doesn't have the Fokker 50.
It could be a Dash-8 or a Saab 340/2000
@CaptainRex123
If this was long enough, it could be an actual book.
@CaptainRex123
I know this is fictional and all, but neither airlines have a Fokker 50, Ryanair only uses the 737.
Edit: ignore me, BA does have the Fokker 50.
@CaptainRex123
Annnd..what airline is it?
@CaptainRex123
That is actually really good. Very creative indeed.
(Just a question, but do you know what kind of aircraft they are in, or at least what type it is (Jet or prop)?)
@xboxseriesx
Well, it happens because as you gain altitude, the air gets thinner. Props work better the closer you are to the ground as there is more air, meaning the engine can get more oxygen, but there is also more air for the propeller to use to push the plane (Same thing with helicopters).
Jets work better at a higher altitude as there is less drag and since they just suck in air and throw it out the back, they can operate at those altitudes with thin air (They have better fuel efficiency with the less drag as they can reduce power whilst still being able to go fast). When jets pass a certain altitude though, they start to lose speed as the air nearer to the edge of space starts to get too thin for the engines to keep outputting reasonable power, which lessens the higher you go.
(There also needs to be suitable air inlets so the jet engine(s) are getting enough air in the first place.)
A rocket engine, of course, doesn't need air, only fuel, to operate. Take the Me 163 Komet. Give it a ton more fuel, and it probably could reach the edge of space, or even space itself.
(Something else worth considering is that the higher you are, the more the aircraft relies on the engine(s) to keep it moving, so the higher you are, the more weight the engine(s) alone have to keep moving so that it stays in the air.)
+1Is the speed that realistic..?
I know it's Ground speed...but still..
Wouldn't that be like..contradicting though if you are wanting your points to reset to prove a point?
People would know who you are, so wouldn't it be better to just make a new account?
@Mustang51
Have you joined the SPBC Discord?
@SavageMan
Yes...
Ohhhh my god, I hate this issue, it really plagues me, and so many others, ugh.
+1@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
Fair point..
For someone with only 840 points, your builds tell me you will go far.
+1(Edit: Make that over 900 points)
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
My idea on that is to give attention to the good builds made by non-platinum users, as Platinum users have 'experience', so they can always make good builds that get nice amounts of attention.
Does that make sense?
@DerpTheSoyacfartala
From my own hands.
@DerpTheSoyacfartala
oookay..
@DerpTheSoyacfartala
Antlers on top of the hat.
@DerpTheSoyacfartala
What about a Santa hat AND Reindeer antlers?
(That's what I like to do IRL)
@OhBoy
The minimum is 300 parts...
Surely your laptop isn't THAT bad (Seeing as I use a laptop myself)?
Noice.
(Love that first Screenshot.)
@OhBoy
Insert it into either a rotator or a default wing part with the appropriate control surface, depends on how you do your wings (Custom wings or just using the default wing parts)
Ooooo, this looks Noice!
(Rip my Laptop though)
@WSI
+1Your welcome
I still see it, sooo....
@WSI
It's an Aerobatic manoeuvre. Look it up.
Ok, how many different versions of this aircraft are there now?
@MrACEpilot
Debatable...
Mph, Kph & Kts are all different for one thing.
And there are a lot of different factors too.
Man, the time periods for each Generation is really all over the place...
@SimpleSimplePlanesTheUser
Just go to 'Manage Account' on your user page. Go to Gravatar using the link in the 'Manage Account' section (preferably open in a separate tab). If you don't have an account, make one. Then make sure you have the same email you used with SimplePlanes. Add a picture, save it, blah blah. Then when you are done with that, go back to SimplePlanes and click the 'Save' button (same place as the Gravatar link). Then just wait for a bit, your pfp will soon change.
(That's how it works on all devices.)
This looks amazing, well done :D
Yeah..Instrument mods..
@Homemade1
I'm also going to make mine carrier-based (Aka: Navy)
I'm revising my design to give it two engines. I'm also using a Delta Wing (and before anyone tells me a Delta Wing isn't "1st Gen", go and look up the history of the Delta Wing, you would be surprised).
Wow, this is really impressive :D
+1@Kennneth
Is the rain supposed to make the surface of your build look reflective or no?
Yas, actual weather!
We won't have just Clouds for once thanks to you.
...what...?
The hell is that supposed to mean
@KhaimaKhaiz
@Mitchellwi
Thank you
@jamesPLANESii
That is the same for certain Mopeds in the UK.
@thebanbehindtheslaughter
Thanks
This may or may not make sense...
In my own opinion, he might want help from a 'professional', or the opinion of one. Because you're dealing with a car here and you need to learn how to do it yourself, that's my best guess as to why he wants you to "call a different shop".
@mikoyanster
Would it be okay to have like, a Triangle-shaped wing, like that on the A-4 Skyhawk, but with the sweep angle similar to the 262's wing?
@NotBappo
Well, like looking on Wiki, the person who essentially invented the Generation system of classification says otherwise
Very nice.
Although, it makes me think of the G.91 a lot
@mikoyanster
Can I just say that aircraft like the F-86, Mig-15 and so on are more 2nd Gen than 1st gen (Although I could be proven wrong if you can tell me otherwise).