@KnightOfRen People make mistakes, or so I've heard. I make mistakes, and I try my best to pass myself off as a human right now whilst I live among them. I'm getting off topic here. It's best we just move on from the whole G-C thing and not mention it.
Skip it. Just keep on building. When you hit gold, look up your crappiest most embarrassing build, paint it gold and upload it under the title "Thanks"
@KnightOfRen Mean? No. MEAN IS SHARING AN AMAZING LOOKING VERSION OF MY FAVORITE JET IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD (WHICH I WILL NOT MENTION HERE BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT TO OPEN MYSELF UP EMOTIONALLY LIKE THAT RIGHT NOW) THAT TURNS LIKE A FISH UNDERWATER BUT EXPLODES IF YOU EVEN THINK ABOUT TRYING TO LAND IT. THAT IS MEAN. TORMENTING ME WITH FALSE VISIONS OF MY LOVE. ok, i might be exaggerating a little bit here for lolz, but seriously, half the fun of this game is the physics engine. nothing has to be perfect, but it would be cool if people made planes that flew well instead of just collecting upvotes
When I comment on a post, I consider a few things. Is this a new player? Does it seem like this person spent much time building this? What do I like about it? What can improve?
I try to make it a point to say something positive every time I comment on someone's work. After all, people care about their creations. But I also make it a point to politely advise what can be improved. That is how we learn. If someone is content to make the same kind of stuff over and over again without changing, so be it. This is a game, it is meant to be fun. But I will offer anyone the opportunity to refine their skills and improve, just as I am grateful to others when they teach me something.
I made a post about this about a year ago. Since then they've released some important new features that have really opened up new creative possibilities. While I would love to support Jundroo with another purchase, I certainly won't be complaining about the content they release to me for free. And if they're doing well then I guess there's no reason for them to change course.
Nah, points are mostly dumb anyway. People spend too much time scheming how to get points and not enough time learning how to build stuff that flies better than a dead hippo.
Do what you like, and don't bother asking other people what to do. Other people are great at helping fix problems and giving advice or criticism. But when it comes to choosing what to make, you'll have more fun making stuff you like.
@jamesPLANESii You may, you may not. Just because the new card requires more juice doesn't mean it wont work, study the PSU carefully. Prebuilt systems often use non-standard components so check around to be sure what you have.
@Aeromotive Yeah, but when it came to putting pilots inside contraptions that would likely kill them, nobody could top the Third Reich. If you click this informative video about the ME-163 Komet and fast forward to 32:30 you'll be treated to the following quote: "Guess where they chose to put the additional tanks of flesh dissolving acid? If you answered 'in the cockpit' you are correct."
@Strikefighter04 The Nazis relied heavily on French industry during WW2, but were often disappointed. Citroen trucks were particularly notorious for their terrible reliability. What the Germans never realized was that the trucks were fine if they had the proper amount of engine oil, the factory workers had merely sabotaged them by shortening all the oil dipsticks.
All-in-one computers are finicky. Be sure to verify you will have a safe amount of EXTRA wattage from the power supply before installing new hardware. Store bought computers often have crappy power supplies because people don't know to look at that kind of stuff.
@Kreep2knight In the end it's up to you. Most people on here don't pay attention to fuel. Personally, I use extra hidden engines that activate automatically at 95% throttle. The extra thrust and fuel consumption seem more or less accurate like that.
@Kreep2knight @Aeromotive A Vietnam-era F4 could burn through hours worth of fuel in 10 minutes with the afterburner running. Each J-79 engine consumed just under 10 pounds per second with afterburner, and it had two of them. That's why midair refueling is so important for fighter planes.
There's a lot of not-so-secret stuff you gotta learn to make advanced stuff work. Disable collisions is one thing. This fairly old guide is still your best bet when it comes to learning how to really get good.
FOR REAL THOUGH, SPBC IS WAY MORE HELPFUL THAN THE FORUMS WHEN IT COMES TO GETTING HELP WITH YOUR PROJECTS. SURE, I GET TIRED OF ALL THE ANIME. BUT THERE'S PLENTY OF NICE PEOPLE AND THE MODERATORS BAN THE LIVING CRAP OUT OF ANYONE THAT ACTS LIKE A JERK, BUT THEY'RE NOT SUPER STRICT EITHER. IT'S A GOOD PLACE TO POST PICS AND LINKS TO STUFF YOU'RE WORKING ON TO GET FEEDBACK AND IMPROVE YOUR SKILLS. ALSO, BLUE BULL POSTS SOME PRETTY DECENT MUSIC ON THERE SOMETIMES.
9/10 would recommend to friends (I subtracted one point for all the anime)
I grew up in the DC area shortly after they changed the name to CSX. When I was a kid, most of the box cars still had the big yellow kitten on the side of them. I never knew what a cat had to do with a train until I grew up.
@Aldriech Yeah, pretty insane stuff. The other guys are right though, the Antonov-225 is the biggest, heaviest plane. Though I think the Super-Guppy looks the fattest.
@Aeromotive It depends on the engine design. In the case of the SR71 and the Foxbat, they were completely designed around using their afterburners to the fullest extent. The J58 is a partial ramjet because of its unique bypass system, but the Foxbat's engines were traditional after burning turbojets, just really really big ones. The thing about afterburners is that you can more than double your thrust with them under the right circumstances, especially with unburned air coming from a bypass. The downside is that afterburners use an astounding amount of fuel, as much as 385 gallons per minute.
The camo really makes it stand out, figuratively speaking.
+1@KnightOfRen People make mistakes, or so I've heard. I make mistakes, and I try my best to pass myself off as a human right now whilst I live among them. I'm getting off topic here. It's best we just move on from the whole G-C thing and not mention it.
+1This is incredible
@KnightOfRen
GOOD
@rexzion That's what I did when I went gold back in 1995. I posted this huge embarrassing failure
@Taylorchaff14 Plane is Polish. I am of United State of Freedum
+1Man, I really like those trees. They look like water color paintings.
PZL M15 BELPHEGOR
+1Skip it. Just keep on building. When you hit gold, look up your crappiest most embarrassing build, paint it gold and upload it under the title "Thanks"
@KnightOfRen Mean? No.
+1MEAN IS SHARING AN AMAZING LOOKING VERSION OF MY FAVORITE JET IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD (WHICH I WILL NOT MENTION HERE BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT TO OPEN MYSELF UP EMOTIONALLY LIKE THAT RIGHT NOW) THAT TURNS LIKE A FISH UNDERWATER BUT EXPLODES IF YOU EVEN THINK ABOUT TRYING TO LAND IT. THAT IS MEAN. TORMENTING ME WITH FALSE VISIONS OF MY LOVE.
ok, i might be exaggerating a little bit here for lolz, but seriously, half the fun of this game is the physics engine. nothing has to be perfect, but it would be cool if people made planes that flew well instead of just collecting upvotes
@ChrisPy NP
@switdog08 Thanks
@switdog08 I should, you're right. As for the dipstick, I misspoke. They cut the notch further down on the stick, so the oil was always too low.
Hey man, that's pretty cool. You can post photos by uploading them to an image hosting site and linking to them like this:
+2
@MemeLordMASTERMEMES xie xie ni means thank you
This is pretty clever
When I comment on a post, I consider a few things. Is this a new player? Does it seem like this person spent much time building this? What do I like about it? What can improve?
I try to make it a point to say something positive every time I comment on someone's work. After all, people care about their creations. But I also make it a point to politely advise what can be improved. That is how we learn. If someone is content to make the same kind of stuff over and over again without changing, so be it. This is a game, it is meant to be fun. But I will offer anyone the opportunity to refine their skills and improve, just as I am grateful to others when they teach me something.
+5Polish, Swedish or Italian?
I made a post about this about a year ago. Since then they've released some important new features that have really opened up new creative possibilities. While I would love to support Jundroo with another purchase, I certainly won't be complaining about the content they release to me for free. And if they're doing well then I guess there's no reason for them to change course.
+3Nah, points are mostly dumb anyway. People spend too much time scheming how to get points and not enough time learning how to build stuff that flies better than a dead hippo.
Post links by having [words in brackets like this](and the link here in parenthesis)
Do what you like, and don't bother asking other people what to do. Other people are great at helping fix problems and giving advice or criticism. But when it comes to choosing what to make, you'll have more fun making stuff you like.
The SBD was a dive bomber, not a torpedo bomber. Got it confused with the TBF Avenger. Otherwise you're on the right track here
@Aeromen The boat or the dude?
PZL M15 BELPHEGOR
+1¡VAMOS ARGENTINA! My wife is a huge fan of your country and I am a big fan of your country's food. Oh, and the plane looks great.
+1@jamesPLANESii You may, you may not. Just because the new card requires more juice doesn't mean it wont work, study the PSU carefully. Prebuilt systems often use non-standard components so check around to be sure what you have.
@Aeromotive Yeah, but when it came to putting pilots inside contraptions that would likely kill them, nobody could top the Third Reich. If you click this informative video about the ME-163 Komet and fast forward to 32:30 you'll be treated to the following quote: "Guess where they chose to put the additional tanks of flesh dissolving acid? If you answered 'in the cockpit' you are correct."
@WIZARD2017 well it all paid off, this thing is awesome!
SIMPLE PLANES
+2So uh, you spent some time on this, huh?
@Strikefighter04 You're only as strong as your weakest link.
+2@Kreep2knight Hahahahahaha
@Strikefighter04 The Nazis relied heavily on French industry during WW2, but were often disappointed. Citroen trucks were particularly notorious for their terrible reliability. What the Germans never realized was that the trucks were fine if they had the proper amount of engine oil, the factory workers had merely sabotaged them by shortening all the oil dipsticks.
+10To increase the "strength" of a rotator use xml (overload mod) to increase the mass.
All-in-one computers are finicky. Be sure to verify you will have a safe amount of EXTRA wattage from the power supply before installing new hardware. Store bought computers often have crappy power supplies because people don't know to look at that kind of stuff.
@Kreep2knight Because he's the lawman. I'm just goofing around.
@Kreep2knight In the end it's up to you. Most people on here don't pay attention to fuel. Personally, I use extra hidden engines that activate automatically at 95% throttle. The extra thrust and fuel consumption seem more or less accurate like that.
@Kreep2knight @Aeromotive A Vietnam-era F4 could burn through hours worth of fuel in 10 minutes with the afterburner running. Each J-79 engine consumed just under 10 pounds per second with afterburner, and it had two of them. That's why midair refueling is so important for fighter planes.
There's a lot of not-so-secret stuff you gotta learn to make advanced stuff work. Disable collisions is one thing. This fairly old guide is still your best bet when it comes to learning how to really get good.
SIMPLE PLANES BUILDERS CHAT:
ARGUE ABOUT ANIME
MAKE FUN OF SWITZERLAND
DONT MESS WITH BLUE BULL
(seriously, don't mess with him)
SPBC HAS IT ALL
FOR REAL THOUGH, SPBC IS WAY MORE HELPFUL THAN THE FORUMS WHEN IT COMES TO GETTING HELP WITH YOUR PROJECTS. SURE, I GET TIRED OF ALL THE ANIME. BUT THERE'S PLENTY OF NICE PEOPLE AND THE MODERATORS BAN THE LIVING CRAP OUT OF ANYONE THAT ACTS LIKE A JERK, BUT THEY'RE NOT SUPER STRICT EITHER. IT'S A GOOD PLACE TO POST PICS AND LINKS TO STUFF YOU'RE WORKING ON TO GET FEEDBACK AND IMPROVE YOUR SKILLS. ALSO, BLUE BULL POSTS SOME PRETTY DECENT MUSIC ON THERE SOMETIMES.
9/10 would recommend to friends (I subtracted one point for all the anime)
+16I grew up in the DC area shortly after they changed the name to CSX. When I was a kid, most of the box cars still had the big yellow kitten on the side of them. I never knew what a cat had to do with a train until I grew up.
@WarHawk95 adorable
@asteroidbook345 you understand that Star Trek was a reference to this?
The Big E
+2Make the tail lighter and the nose heavier
@railfanethan
Creepy Ice Cream Truck
I think we could use less of these sorts of posts. Why not just delete this before we have a big fuss?
@Aldriech Yeah, pretty insane stuff. The other guys are right though, the Antonov-225 is the biggest, heaviest plane. Though I think the Super-Guppy looks the fattest.
@Aeromotive It depends on the engine design. In the case of the SR71 and the Foxbat, they were completely designed around using their afterburners to the fullest extent. The J58 is a partial ramjet because of its unique bypass system, but the Foxbat's engines were traditional after burning turbojets, just really really big ones. The thing about afterburners is that you can more than double your thrust with them under the right circumstances, especially with unburned air coming from a bypass. The downside is that afterburners use an astounding amount of fuel, as much as 385 gallons per minute.
+1