@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook cordScale property needs to be set to 7-8 for the prop to work just under the surface. As the depth increases, you need bigger cordScale.
@SmSmThe10684 I checked the teaser. You have tagged twelve people, and even if we count upvotes as tags, not nearly that many asked for it.
Yes, you can reupload.
Your post has been removed for continuing the drama.
I understand that you're just trying to express your counter-opinion as vocally as the original opinion was expressed. However, posts like these do no good to the community.
I have edited your post to exclude the part where you are calling out a specific user. Said user did not consent to his builds being used as a negative example. Do it again and you will be issued a strike.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@KnightOfRen I wouldn't strike you over an opinion. That would be abusing mod powers.
Let's not spam this comment section though. If you want to talk more, you know where to find me.
@KnightOfRen I don't do the whole build for a thumbnail. I do fuselage art. However, I always post an example of a build that would score high so people can see I'm competent to judge their entries.
@APilotOfPlanes this challenge is acceptable. I wouldn't join it though. If you don't have a bushplane presentable enough to be in the thumbnail, how can you fairly rate bushplanes?
@Ndndhrndnndnd the mod has been removed from the site by its author, so I can't. If you want to download the build, click "ok" on the missing mod message, undo, then redo. Build will load without the gun. Then just add the stock cannon.
@NojusGindrenas Antonov An2 Kukuruznik, legendary for its durability, payload capacity, and ability to land on incredibly short and rough runways. It's allegedly so easy to fly that you'd have to be an idiot to crash one. It has no stated stall speed, and instead of stalling it glides down at the parachute descent rate.
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook
cordScaleproperty needs to be set to 7-8 for the prop to work just under the surface. As the depth increases, you need biggercordScale.@SmSmThe10684 I checked the teaser. You have tagged twelve people, and even if we count upvotes as tags, not nearly that many asked for it.
Yes, you can reupload.
Your post has been removed for mass tagging.
"Upvote to be tagged" is begging for upvotes. I have edited that part out.
Your post has been removed for continuing the drama.
I understand that you're just trying to express your counter-opinion as vocally as the original opinion was expressed. However, posts like these do no good to the community.
@ToxicToxicTheVito REW didn't request his content to be removed. KnightOfRen did. I also don't think REW will mind being used as a positive example.
I have edited your post to exclude the part where you are calling out a specific user. Said user did not consent to his builds being used as a negative example. Do it again and you will be issued a strike.
@STUKAWOLF87 sure. You only can't tag random people to get attention to your post.
@STUKAWOLF87 you can tag a user or two for that if you think they'll be willing to help.
@lxc010826 sure, you can repost this build. The rule isn't on the "Rules" page because Andrew is lazy, so you didn't get a strike.
@lxc010826 Your post has been removed for mass tagging.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Done.
@AzureCorp You need to give me a link to the challenge.
Pyramid ship.
You have a strike now. Get two more and you will be banned.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@KnightOfRen I wouldn't strike you over an opinion. That would be abusing mod powers.
Let's not spam this comment section though. If you want to talk more, you know where to find me.
@KnightOfRen I don't do the whole build for a thumbnail. I do fuselage art. However, I always post an example of a build that would score high so people can see I'm competent to judge their entries.
@APilotOfPlanes this challenge is acceptable. I wouldn't join it though. If you don't have a bushplane presentable enough to be in the thumbnail, how can you fairly rate bushplanes?
@STUKAWOLF87 no. If they don't want to be in the challenge, you can't force them.
@BuiltBionixInd10 might be him. I only did a quick check, didn't investigate deeper.
It would seem that the account has been deleted by the user and that no new one has been made.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@STUKAWOLF87 thanks :)
@DefinitelyNotAnFBI @Someterribleuser it is now a successor.
@UNOWENWasHer I have removed underscores from your username, as they rendered you impossible to tag.
@TCollins thanks :)
@krevedkopro tag those who have expressed interest in being tagged on this post. Maybe two or three users who you're 100% certain would be interested.
I suggest showing the thing in action or something to still make it attractive to check out.
@krevedkopro nope. I can't edit screenshots. You'll have to post again.
I won't issue you a strike. If it weren't for the rule, I'd have left it up. However, only challenges are allowed misleading thumbnails.
Please repost with appropriate thumbnail. Also, mass tagging is against the rules now.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@AsteroidAsteroidTheBook have someone tell the user to comment somewhere.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Your post has been removed. Please keep your forum posts in the "Forum" section.
@KettleKip no problem.
@KettleKip it has been done. Ping me when you get it.
@FeiWu done.
@Hkis it's a copy. The stock comment simply lists a few common things that make build a copy, doesn't mean that your build has all those things.
@MajorSix I can't. I don't have a link to the challenge I can copy from.
@Ndndhrndnndnd lol
@Ndndhrndnndnd lol
@Ndndhrndnndnd :)
@Ndndhrndnndnd I'm glad you like my stuff :)
@Ndndhrndnndnd the mod has been removed from the site by its author, so I can't. If you want to download the build, click "ok" on the missing mod message, undo, then redo. Build will load without the gun. Then just add the stock cannon.
@WIZARD2017 sounds good.
@NojusGindrenas Antonov An2 Kukuruznik, legendary for its durability, payload capacity, and ability to land on incredibly short and rough runways. It's allegedly so easy to fly that you'd have to be an idiot to crash one. It has no stated stall speed, and instead of stalling it glides down at the parachute descent rate.
@Archanis sure