@2008abdupro it's fine. Now you know for the next time. Either ask people to actually build something, or to post their entries in forums if they are not builds.
The post thumbnail must show the build as it is, which is in this case a bare cockpit. To participate in this challenge, make a forum post and tag the guy whose challenge it is in the comments of the forum post. No action will be taken against you, as I believe you didn't know of this rule.
You just got a few people to break the rules. If that becomes a trend, I will ban you instead of them. Unless the build post is a challenge, thumbnail must depict the build, not a picture unrelated to the build. I have edited the post to instruct users how to appropriately enter the challenge.
Your post has been removed for excessive profanity. Please read the rules of this community. We moderators, including Vincent, are doing our best to keep this site friendly to both old and new users. Obey the rules, be nice to other users, and you will never have a problem with us. We don't like to ban people, but if you continue breaking the rules, your SimplePlanes career will be a fairly short one.
If the part count is the issue, you can make a pretty decent machine gun with a hinge rotator without a base and a wing gun. Add disc mag on top of it, and you have a machine gun that can possibly be found on a real Po-2. As for the engine, you can try using rotator bases to give it ribs. Real one only has five cylinders and a bulky center mass. It might be even fewer parts than what you currently have.
Look at the size of the build. The build ran away around 2.5km on x axis and around 2.5km on y axis. You just have to look for it. At least that's my guess.
You also seem to have a recent backup. If you can't find where it went, download backup and continue from there.
@Dung6517 you seem to have only added two stock weapons. Just because the original is unlisted, it doesn't mean you can claim it as yours. Besides, original was published, you just found the unlisted backup and used it.
@Skykid028 it's fine. Nice drawing, by the way.
@2008abdupro it's fine. Now you know for the next time. Either ask people to actually build something, or to post their entries in forums if they are not builds.
The post thumbnail must show the build as it is, which is in this case a bare cockpit. To participate in this challenge, make a forum post and tag the guy whose challenge it is in the comments of the forum post. No action will be taken against you, as I believe you didn't know of this rule.
You just got a few people to break the rules. If that becomes a trend, I will ban you instead of them. Unless the build post is a challenge, thumbnail must depict the build, not a picture unrelated to the build. I have edited the post to instruct users how to appropriately enter the challenge.
You may tag me on your post, and provide a link to the challenge. I can edit successors.
@PapaKernels yes.
@Fox00One yes.
Your post has been removed for excessive profanity. Please read the rules of this community. We moderators, including Vincent, are doing our best to keep this site friendly to both old and new users. Obey the rules, be nice to other users, and you will never have a problem with us. We don't like to ban people, but if you continue breaking the rules, your SimplePlanes career will be a fairly short one.
@BreadDoBeKindaSus oh, I understand the burnout. I hope you'll revisit this build in the future though, it's a really good base.
@MAHADI I have no idea when the update will come.
If the part count is the issue, you can make a pretty decent machine gun with a hinge rotator without a base and a wing gun. Add disc mag on top of it, and you have a machine gun that can possibly be found on a real Po-2. As for the engine, you can try using rotator bases to give it ribs. Real one only has five cylinders and a bulky center mass. It might be even fewer parts than what you currently have.
@Fox00One sure.
@Mikey101234 you should be able to put six tags yourself now.
@LightningTreeSavor you have linked your notifications page. I need the link to the challenge post lol
@LightningTreeSavor I can't. You haven't given me a link to the challenge and I can't be bothered to go look for it myself.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
Look at the size of the build. The build ran away around 2.5km on x axis and around 2.5km on y axis. You just have to look for it. At least that's my guess.
You also seem to have a recent backup. If you can't find where it went, download backup and continue from there.
@Sergio666 please read the rules. Randomly tagging people is forbidden.
@JustLookingForFriends you must be fun at parties.
@TatsuTheDemonLord sure.
@KfcGaming this is what a generic trainer aircraft looks like. Pilatus PC-21, Embraer Super Tucano, Utva Kobac, and a few others look a lot like this.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here
@BagelPlane sure.
@LightningTreeSavor upvotes cannot be transferred from one build to another. I can make this a successor to the challenge if you want.
@asteroidbook345 sure.
@Locurapuntocom of course, as long as you give proper credit.
@MuizTheMobileFriendly I can when I have a link or the code of the challenge post.
@HelloHelloTheUnt I can do something close to that. I linked it to the repost of the original build.
@Default4 sure.
@Dung6517 you're welcome.
@Dung6517 in that case, I'll leave this one removed and you keep the new one. Always list your changes on successor builds.
@DeltaBravoSix of course I do. Properly made meat burek is great, especially with our kind of yogurt.
@Dung6517 ok, I'll leave it up then.
@DeltaBravoSix no idea.
@Dung6517 you seem to have only added two stock weapons. Just because the original is unlisted, it doesn't mean you can claim it as yours. Besides, original was published, you just found the unlisted backup and used it.
Your post has been removed as spam. Please keep your forum posts in the forum section of the site.
@2Papi2Chulo sure. Code is always helpful, as it saves me a few clicks.
@WingsOfSteel done.
@Fox00One sure.
@RamboJutter I don't see the nose width as the problem. I don't think you have the length for such a large engine.
Very nice heavy fighter. I like the design. I assume both engines are behind the cockpit, as there's not enough room for a V12 in the nose.
@RPC3503 giving credit in description is recommended.
@LightningTreeSavor took you long enough XD
@HadesHadestheWeeb of course.
@PapaKernels yes.
@rexzion ok, make one.
@Neenyboy that happens sometimes. I'll fix it.
@asteroidbook345 ok
Why not give it a proper name? It's a good build.
Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here