@ChasingHorizon that's nice. I'm currently making more planes and vehicles than ships, but I'm sure something in my arsenal is up to the job of stopping your Scarlet fleet. As for this one, it's meant to destroy convoys, provide close air support, stop insurgencies, and gather information. It's not meant to sink ships.
Android is not such a great handicap. Most of the PC players don't go over 500 parts, and my limit is approximately 450. You just need a decent device, and a lot of patience.
I think your attitude is wrong. I never build for attention. Some of the models of mine that ate the entire week (like M.Corp AIFV Wolf) failed got less upvotes that some of my lower quality builds (M.CorpCWS PB1 Flame). I'd really like to see an overdone B36. I bet it'll look great.
@Garretto3 I'm not really that good. There are much better builders. It's just spending a lot of time on one build, trimming it till it's just the way you want it to be. With effort, points will come.
@Shipwright visit one of my more recent ships, and find a small red cylinder part (.25x.25x.5) at the waterline, nudged into the hull. It's a fuselage piece with xml edited buoyancy. Install a couple of them on your ship, in the similar fashion. Also, make sure that center of mass is as low as possible.
"Expressed a personal goal"? Expressing the goal means asking people to help achieve it, and in this case, it literally means to give you upvotes.
"A. Stated realistic expectations about how popular my uploads are, and will continue to be"
Ugh, I think that's up to us (other users) to decide. Just because you believe your builds are popular, doesn't mean that people have to upvote them. Also, when you get less upvotes than usual, consider the possibility that you haven't reached your usual quality, or you chose the kind of build that simply isn't that interesting. I fully support actions taken by @MediocrePlanes.
@AeroEngineering if you have mentioned it earlier, it might have been F-15...
@KingDeadshot thanks
@GearGuy123 thank you
@Tully2001 Gato is joking. I don't think I ever saw him doing anything else.
@XxcreedexX yup
@mikoyanster thanks m8. I'm really glad that you like it
@XxcreedexX MaleticAirplanes, yes, since my last name is Maletić
@Cedy117 .-.. --- .-..
@Gestour thanks
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation - .... .- -. -.- ...
@cobalT hvala. Trudio sam se
@Cedy117 thank you, Ced
@Sauce - .... .- - .----. ... / .-. .. --. .... - .-.-.- / - .... .- -. -.- ...
@JackTheBestBoss I'm glad to hear that. Thanks
Why not K98 bayonet? That knife is so big, it can be used as a hammer if it's blunt. I have two of those in my collection. This dagger is nice too
Hey, you're back =)
Something in the description gives me the feeling that this is a MiG 21. I might be wrong.
@ahappyape oh, I'll blush :)
@baallzebub no problem
HF, why does it have your own upvote?
@ChasingHorizon that's nice. I'm currently making more planes and vehicles than ships, but I'm sure something in my arsenal is up to the job of stopping your Scarlet fleet. As for this one, it's meant to destroy convoys, provide close air support, stop insurgencies, and gather information. It's not meant to sink ships.
@kukimuki1234 interesantna stvarčica
It looks amazing. Great job
@drdoom222 here it is
@HellFireKoder is this real? When is Android version coming?
@VernalTie513 no problem. It's a cute plane, and a rare sight here.
@esms1999 yup, it's based on BMP 2. It says it in the description.
@Mudkip OK. Can't wait to see what you're gonna make ot it
@Mudkip it's my boat, and Pilotmario can't permit you to use it. I, on the other hand, can. Just try to keep it a successor.
@Tully2001 oh =}
@Tully2001 I'll take that as "amazing". Thanks Tully.
@CaesiciusPlanes Mediocre and I, we are kinda buddies. Also, thanks.
@Sauce @cobalT thanks guys
You can alter the word Honda. Write "Hynda" or "Hondda" instead. Everyone will get it, and you'll slip around the copyright policy.
Android is not such a great handicap. Most of the PC players don't go over 500 parts, and my limit is approximately 450. You just need a decent device, and a lot of patience.
I think your attitude is wrong. I never build for attention. Some of the models of mine that ate the entire week (like M.Corp AIFV Wolf) failed got less upvotes that some of my lower quality builds (M.CorpCWS PB1 Flame). I'd really like to see an overdone B36. I bet it'll look great.
@Gestour no problem m8. I would miss spotlighting a great creation such as this one
Beautiful. Great job, m8.
Nice plane. If you keep making them this good, and improving along the way, you'll get far.
@VernalTie513 no problem
@Garretto3 I'm not really that good. There are much better builders. It's just spending a lot of time on one build, trimming it till it's just the way you want it to be. With effort, points will come.
@Garretto3 no problem. It's a good build, especially given your current level. Keep up the good work, and you'll go far.
Definitely spotlight-worthy. Great job with details
@Mod @Squirrel he took me hostage once, and even though my family payed ransom, he killed me... Now I'm undead.
@VernalTie513 no problem
@Shipwright visit one of my more recent ships, and find a small red cylinder part (.25x.25x.5) at the waterline, nudged into the hull. It's a fuselage piece with xml edited buoyancy. Install a couple of them on your ship, in the similar fashion. Also, make sure that center of mass is as low as possible.
@SkyShot those people would be banned
"Expressed a personal goal"? Expressing the goal means asking people to help achieve it, and in this case, it literally means to give you upvotes.
"A. Stated realistic expectations about how popular my uploads are, and will continue to be"
Ugh, I think that's up to us (other users) to decide. Just because you believe your builds are popular, doesn't mean that people have to upvote them. Also, when you get less upvotes than usual, consider the possibility that you haven't reached your usual quality, or you chose the kind of build that simply isn't that interesting. I fully support actions taken by @MediocrePlanes.
@Pilotmario you got the permission
@Shipwright unfortunately, part coun exceeds capabilities of my device. Can you describe the problem, and I'll try to think of a way to fix it?