@Graingy I relaxed the standard because I had some time left and decided to rate those few builds that didn't meet the requirements but didn't entirely miss the topic.
@Densja if I'm not mistaken, that would be my friend @BogdanX. Unfortunately, he deleted his account a few months ago, so your best bet would be modifying this build back to a single plane.
@SunnyOmori a piece of advice from a guy that's been with this community for eight years now: this kind of stunts might earn you some credit with the newer members of the community, but no lasting reputation. My advice to you is to start making builds, and good ones at that, if you want people here to recognize you. For random chatting and socializing, use many discord server linked in the pinned "List Of Discord Servers" forum post.
If you want to actually play the game, you can learn from other builders, both by exploring their builds, and by asking them how they did certain things. If you're just here for internet points and cheap validation, you'll find Facebook a much better alternative.
This post is so far against the rules that it would have earned you a ban back when I was a moderator. Let's wait and see what current moderators think about this blatant abuse of the point system.
Deleting parts with backspace button doesn't work. Other keyboard inputs are working properly.
Fine Tuner mod is bricked. It doesn't move or rotate parts.
Is the challenge accepting armored fighting vehicles that border on tanks or are often mislabeled as tanks, such as assault guns, self-propelled artillery, wheeled vehicles with tank guns, and tank destroyers?
By the way, this is a pretty nice challenge. Good luck with it.
@BluestBoi oh, never mind that. When you have a history of hosting popular challenges, you learn to use as much of a harsh tone as you can. It makes people read the rules carefully, resulting in higher quality of entries, and more good airships for the community to enjoy.
@Planemaker1012 I'm glad you like it. Half of the building process here was shaving off excess parts and tweaking functionality. I too was playing on a second-hand laptop at the time, and the goal is to make it not lag even on my device.
@asteroidbook345 thank you for clarifying all that. I was almost afraid I was up against a rational person here. So:
Lacking moral high ground means you are morally wrong. You admitted to not having it.
You have failed to discuss facts, thus making it apparent that you are also factually wrong.
You keep insisting on insulting me, proving the poor quality of your character, and making your entire statement pointless by virtue of being a lesser man.
@asteroidbook345 unfortunately, you have just lost your moral high ground by attacking my ideology without reasonable arguments, and by insulting me.
I must advise practicing your manners, as well as expanding your vocabulary, and learning how to converse.
@Terminator2809 since you have failed to read it, I'll paste it here for you:
"You have been permanently banned from PortSP for persistent immature and disruptive behavior, having been warned far too many times.
Sad to see you go, it's not us, it's you.
kind wishes
EternalDarkness"
Having pretty much mastered fuselages by now, I think you should also try custom wings. This technique offers decent, easy to make custom wings with low part count.
As always, nice build.
You should have given the engine less torque in my opinion. Taking off is really difficult. Wheels could have been scaled by width to reduce the attachment point size. Other than that, it's a very nice build.
You can edit description by pressing the little triangle next to the number of downloads, and then "edit". I'm not requesting that you do, as I find the comment and auto credit above description to be more than enough. Just for future use, when you find yourself in the need to correct a typo or something.
@JacksEpicGamingYT it's difficult not to know that something is rude. Usually, you would get a warning for the first minor offense, at least back when I was a moderator. For the current state of affairs, you would have to ask current moderators.
I like pre-dreadnoughts, and this build sort of captures the spirit of one.
You should try to, if not build a replica of a real pre-dreadnought, then at least work off a picture and try to get close.
Should you decide to do that, you can ask me for tips, or join PortSP, Discord server for exchanging shipbuilding techniques.
@IceCraftGaming it's heavy for what it is. Actually for what it was meant to be. The build it was made for was supposed to hold twelve of them, along with assorted smaller guns, and other things a protected cruiser should have. Over one thousand parts just for the main guns would be a bit excessive.
@fantasyucakistan this is a very old build. It could use a complete remake. Game's physics have been somewhat updated since this was built, and it wasn't a very good build to begin with.
I suggest joining PortSP Discord server if you are interested in learning more about building ships in Simple Planes. It's a dedicated shipbuilding server. Here's the invite link.
I would expect it to lift more (the most interesting trait of S-boot was that both bow and stern lifted while still cutting the water instead of planning on it), and more tolling in turns. It would be nice to see the spare torpedoes actually pushed in when reloading.
Other than that, very nice boat. Great details, fun to use, and accurate.
@Graingy I relaxed the standard because I had some time left and decided to rate those few builds that didn't meet the requirements but didn't entirely miss the topic.
+1Amazing build Dim. Looks perfect, loads of details, great proportion... Good work.
+1@ccc12345 sure.
+1@Densja if I'm not mistaken, that would be my friend @BogdanX. Unfortunately, he deleted his account a few months ago, so your best bet would be modifying this build back to a single plane.
+1@SunnyOmori a piece of advice from a guy that's been with this community for eight years now: this kind of stunts might earn you some credit with the newer members of the community, but no lasting reputation. My advice to you is to start making builds, and good ones at that, if you want people here to recognize you. For random chatting and socializing, use many discord server linked in the pinned "List Of Discord Servers" forum post.
+1If you want to actually play the game, you can learn from other builders, both by exploring their builds, and by asking them how they did certain things. If you're just here for internet points and cheap validation, you'll find Facebook a much better alternative.
Dornier trademark pointy wings (:
+1This post is so far against the rules that it would have earned you a ban back when I was a moderator. Let's wait and see what current moderators think about this blatant abuse of the point system.
+1@Type2volkswagen you're in time for the challenge. I'm just waiting for one more entry.
+1I like this one.
It looks amazing B. I love it.
+1bug
Deleting parts with backspace button doesn't work. Other keyboard inputs are working properly.
+1Fine Tuner mod is bricked. It doesn't move or rotate parts.
A very fine build, especially for the part count. It has a bit of trouble losing speed, but other than that, flies very well.
+1@WinsWings it is.
+1Thanks for the entry. It looks really nice.
+1@Quartz05 you don't have to, of course, though you could benefit from it. We're sharing ideas and techniques there.
+1Is the challenge accepting armored fighting vehicles that border on tanks or are often mislabeled as tanks, such as assault guns, self-propelled artillery, wheeled vehicles with tank guns, and tank destroyers?
+1By the way, this is a pretty nice challenge. Good luck with it.
@ACGspOfficial by upvoting their builds.
+1@BluestBoi oh, never mind that. When you have a history of hosting popular challenges, you learn to use as much of a harsh tone as you can. It makes people read the rules carefully, resulting in higher quality of entries, and more good airships for the community to enjoy.
+1Thanks for the entry.
+1I didn't think I'd ever see a Kraguj properly done on SP. Good job.
+1@MrShenanigansSP I will probably accommodate a few late entries.
+1@UnmanagedReservoir you can't limit art, eh?
+1@Planemaker1012 I'm glad you like it. Half of the building process here was shaving off excess parts and tweaking functionality. I too was playing on a second-hand laptop at the time, and the goal is to make it not lag even on my device.
+1@asteroidbook345 thank you for clarifying all that. I was almost afraid I was up against a rational person here. So:
+1Lacking moral high ground means you are morally wrong. You admitted to not having it.
You have failed to discuss facts, thus making it apparent that you are also factually wrong.
You keep insisting on insulting me, proving the poor quality of your character, and making your entire statement pointless by virtue of being a lesser man.
@asteroidbook345 unfortunately, you have just lost your moral high ground by attacking my ideology without reasonable arguments, and by insulting me.
+1I must advise practicing your manners, as well as expanding your vocabulary, and learning how to converse.
@Garuda dobrodošao na SimplePlanes. Ovo je jednostavan, brzinski projekat, ali mi je drago da ti se sviđa.
+1Are those custom wings that I see? (:
+1@Terminator2809 since you have failed to read it, I'll paste it here for you:
+1"You have been permanently banned from PortSP for persistent immature and disruptive behavior, having been warned far too many times.
Sad to see you go, it's not us, it's you.
kind wishes
EternalDarkness"
@Terminator2809 You had a message accompanying the ban.
+1Having pretty much mastered fuselages by now, I think you should also try custom wings. This technique offers decent, easy to make custom wings with low part count.
+1As always, nice build.
You should have given the engine less torque in my opinion. Taking off is really difficult. Wheels could have been scaled by width to reduce the attachment point size. Other than that, it's a very nice build.
+1@MAPA you're welcome buddy. It's a duty of us veterans to help the new guys get better and get noticed.
+1It's so boxy, Short Sherpa fell in love with it.
+1I like it though.
You can edit description by pressing the little triangle next to the number of downloads, and then "edit". I'm not requesting that you do, as I find the comment and auto credit above description to be more than enough. Just for future use, when you find yourself in the need to correct a typo or something.
+1@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII you have a point there.
+1@JacksEpicGamingYT it's difficult not to know that something is rude. Usually, you would get a warning for the first minor offense, at least back when I was a moderator. For the current state of affairs, you would have to ask current moderators.
+1I like pre-dreadnoughts, and this build sort of captures the spirit of one.
+1You should try to, if not build a replica of a real pre-dreadnought, then at least work off a picture and try to get close.
Should you decide to do that, you can ask me for tips, or join PortSP, Discord server for exchanging shipbuilding techniques.
@IceCraftGaming it's heavy for what it is. Actually for what it was meant to be. The build it was made for was supposed to hold twelve of them, along with assorted smaller guns, and other things a protected cruiser should have. Over one thousand parts just for the main guns would be a bit excessive.
+1@RomanoMilos oh, then it's great. I didn't know that.
+1@fantasyucakistan this is a very old build. It could use a complete remake. Game's physics have been somewhat updated since this was built, and it wasn't a very good build to begin with.
+1@UrLocalGallade definitions of a corvette vary, though this ship indeed fits most of them. Its design is even based on an actual corvette.
+1You should have used a camera for pilot view, so I can keep it on the instrument panel while fiddling with buttons. Other than that, nice build.
+1Oh, hi Jasp. I haven't noticed it's you.
PS: I upvote what I like, regardless of who made it.
+1@KingOfTypos They are very nice indeed. I'm glad that you have found my technique useful.
+1I suggest joining PortSP Discord server if you are interested in learning more about building ships in Simple Planes. It's a dedicated shipbuilding server. Here's the invite link.
+1Very nice. It's rair to see a cruiser from the first word war on this site.
+1@ReinMcDeer no. RPČ-214 river patrol boat.
+1I would expect it to lift more (the most interesting trait of S-boot was that both bow and stern lifted while still cutting the water instead of planning on it), and more tolling in turns. It would be nice to see the spare torpedoes actually pushed in when reloading.
+1Other than that, very nice boat. Great details, fun to use, and accurate.
@jamesPLANESii indeed. It's not a beast, but it can run this build just fine.
+1I can finally play with your builds.
+1Very nice work, I really enjoyed it.
Never skip the leg day.
+1