@ChiyomiAnzai even completely fictional designs are valid entries as long as they are realistic. What I mean is no railguns, plasma cannons, pulse cannons, and other sci-fi stuff.
@Alexiozo I advise going with conventional technologies. Lasers as effective air defence weapon are still fiction, and I'm not sure aa mines can be effectively used on SP.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Shippy456 as for making custom missiles, if the detacher doesn't fly with the missile, you've attached it the wrong way. Missile must be attached to the large part of the detacher, body to the connection point on the back of the detacher, and the entire thing must be connected to the plane via small side of the detacher.
@Shippy456 that wouldn't really work. You see, radar needs to separate one channel for every missile and one for every target. That means it can control a limited number of missiles. It is more beneficial to have more big missiles that can engage multiple targets in a wide area then to have one missile with a number of sub-missiles that will engage small area that can be covered by a single missile with a large warhead. There's also the cost issue.
@Shippy456 I know what they are. Area-effect ground-to-ground or air-to-ground ordinance. But what do they have to do with this challenge? You're not thinking of using them against planes?
What would be a point of such small missiles? They would cost nearly as much as big ones, and would have range of only a few hundred meters and blast radius of just a few meters. No fantasy weapons. @Notaleopard
@Hawkeye156 you can ask someone else to scale it for you. I'll test the build without any edits when I download it, so I don't influence the results with my edit.
@MTakach I really don't like workin on other people's builds. As for tips, i suggest trying to replicate techniques used by other users. I'm not sure which one would suit you best.
Well, they're pretty good lately.
@ChiyomiAnzai even completely fictional designs are valid entries as long as they are realistic. What I mean is no railguns, plasma cannons, pulse cannons, and other sci-fi stuff.
Use the Air Defence tag. Otherwise, entry won't be accepted. If seems to fulfill all other requirements.
@iLikePlanes100 no problem.
@88blaroo it has been accepted. I won't give any feedback on any of the entries until judging.
@DaKraken it can be a standalone launcher.
Btw, that's one nice looking tank hull.
Your post has been removed for bypassing successor system. You have been issued a strike.
@Alienbeef0421 no problem.
@88blaroo ok, thanks for the entry.
I like it. Looks like a fusion of Antonov An-2 and a trailer house.
@MTakach I've already left comments below explaining it.
@DarDragon oh, my bad. You posted that nice quad AAA. That is perfectly acceptable.
@DarDragon that rocket of yours doesn't meet the rules anyway. It's not a complete system, and part count is to low.
@DarDragon no. Read the description of the challenge please.
@Alexiozo I advise going with conventional technologies. Lasers as effective air defence weapon are still fiction, and I'm not sure aa mines can be effectively used on SP.
@JohnnyBoythePilot that's not really air defence, I think. More of an active protection system. I can't find any info on such systems though.
@CustomAircraftMods depends on the server. You can join two open servers through links in my bio.
@HarrisCraft I don't think so. I haven't checked lately though.
I won't issue a strike for bypassing successor system as I understand it's a joke. I'll issue a strike next time though.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@MTakach yes.
@kshatria ok, thanks.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@ChiyomiAnzai dunno. I'm not supposed to give advices on my challenge. I'll rate whatever you come up with.
@ChiyomiAnzai it's all up to you.
@Hawkeye156 dunno.
@Zippy6 no. It's an interceptor aircraft, not a land-based system.
@Zyvx you won't be disappointed. It's still one of the most popular maps for testing ground vehicles.
@Zyvx thanks :)
@Zyvx I'm glad you like it.
@Hawkeye156 yes, probably.
@Shippy456 as for making custom missiles, if the detacher doesn't fly with the missile, you've attached it the wrong way. Missile must be attached to the large part of the detacher, body to the connection point on the back of the detacher, and the entire thing must be connected to the plane via small side of the detacher.
@Shippy456 that wouldn't really work. You see, radar needs to separate one channel for every missile and one for every target. That means it can control a limited number of missiles. It is more beneficial to have more big missiles that can engage multiple targets in a wide area then to have one missile with a number of sub-missiles that will engage small area that can be covered by a single missile with a large warhead. There's also the cost issue.
@Shippy456 I know what they are. Area-effect ground-to-ground or air-to-ground ordinance. But what do they have to do with this challenge? You're not thinking of using them against planes?
@Shippy456 I don't know. What about them?
What would be a point of such small missiles? They would cost nearly as much as big ones, and would have range of only a few hundred meters and blast radius of just a few meters. No fantasy weapons. @Notaleopard
@UnguidedCylinder I can't allow railguns, as those are quite near to fantasy genre. Custom missiles sound good.
@Leehopard no. And your air defence system is a year old anyway. You can make a new one. Nice picture though XD
@Hawkeye156 you can ask someone else to scale it for you. I'll test the build without any edits when I download it, so I don't influence the results with my edit.
Sorry, but memorial posts aren't allowed in the builds section. Please keep such posts in forums.
@Hawkeye156 you can ask someone to scale it for you.
@Cardboard here you go. Now promote the tag to mechanism builders.
@ChiyomiAnzai I will be aiming. Can be a Maxim AA emplacement, but it must be a dedicated AA emplacement.
@0n33 yes.
@MTakach I really don't like workin on other people's builds. As for tips, i suggest trying to replicate techniques used by other users. I'm not sure which one would suit you best.
@WaffleCakes such build will be accepted. But weapon itself will need to have required 150 parts.
@Strikefighter04 yup. Forgot to mention that, didn't I... Gonna fix that in a second. Thanks for telling me.
@Strikefighter04 yup. Made it a few days ago.
@ChiyomiAnzai yup. Just talked to Andrew about it.