@Shippy456 I know what they are. Area-effect ground-to-ground or air-to-ground ordinance. But what do they have to do with this challenge? You're not thinking of using them against planes?
This heavily contradicts what I've been seeing, and I'm here for a lot longer than you are. Problem with role plays isn't that people outside of them are advocating against them, it is that people within role plays are starting fights with each other and bringing their fights to the site. Users then report the argument full of cursing, calling out and whatnot to us, and we remove the cancerous post. When role plays are happening off the site, they are outside our jurisdiction. While I'd be happy if they stayed off the site, they are still allowed.
What would be a point of such small missiles? They would cost nearly as much as big ones, and would have range of only a few hundred meters and blast radius of just a few meters. No fantasy weapons. @Notaleopard
@Hawkeye156 you can ask someone else to scale it for you. I'll test the build without any edits when I download it, so I don't influence the results with my edit.
@ThomasRoderick cruise missiles range from around 500kg to around 7500kg in mass, 800km/h to 5500km/h, and are generally very soft targets. However, you usually need a decent-size fragmentation warhead for them to increase chances of hitting.
@MTakach I really don't like workin on other people's builds. As for tips, i suggest trying to replicate techniques used by other users. I'm not sure which one would suit you best.
@ThomasRoderick I will try to take appropriate target for the system (a byplane for early guns, cruise missiles for anti-missile systems... ) and will test without mods.
Your post has been removed as it is a copy of this post. It is not enough that you repaint a build to call it your own. Please follow the rules. You have been issued a strike for bypassing the successor system.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
It works pretty well. I don't think mobile folk will be able to use it without a gun attached somewhere, as FireGuns button only shows up on mobile when there actually is a gun. I suggest posting an unlisted version with a gun and putting a link to it in description.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
@Shippy456 I know what they are. Area-effect ground-to-ground or air-to-ground ordinance. But what do they have to do with this challenge? You're not thinking of using them against planes?
@xGeneralFischx there are no corrupt mods, buddy. Also, every auto-removed post is checked by moderators and approved if it doesn't break rules.
+4@xGeneralFischx no post gets removed for no reason. This site has rules. If the post is against the rules, it gets removed.
+2@Notaleopard click
+3This heavily contradicts what I've been seeing, and I'm here for a lot longer than you are. Problem with role plays isn't that people outside of them are advocating against them, it is that people within role plays are starting fights with each other and bringing their fights to the site. Users then report the argument full of cursing, calling out and whatnot to us, and we remove the cancerous post. When role plays are happening off the site, they are outside our jurisdiction. While I'd be happy if they stayed off the site, they are still allowed.
+5@Shippy456 I don't know. What about them?
What would be a point of such small missiles? They would cost nearly as much as big ones, and would have range of only a few hundred meters and blast radius of just a few meters. No fantasy weapons. @Notaleopard
@UnguidedCylinder I can't allow railguns, as those are quite near to fantasy genre. Custom missiles sound good.
@Leehopard no. And your air defence system is a year old anyway. You can make a new one. Nice picture though XD
@Hawkeye156 you can ask someone else to scale it for you. I'll test the build without any edits when I download it, so I don't influence the results with my edit.
Sorry, but memorial posts aren't allowed in the builds section. Please keep such posts in forums.
@Hawkeye156 you can ask someone to scale it for you.
@Cardboard here you go. Now promote the tag to mechanism builders.
@Cardboard I don't see any mechanical builds on your profile. I need one so I can create a tag.
+1@ChiyomiAnzai I will be aiming. Can be a Maxim AA emplacement, but it must be a dedicated AA emplacement.
@QuesoAirlines there is an attach point on the back of the detacher. That's where fuselage connects.
+1@0n33 yes.
@grizzlitn you can xml edit a post to be a successor. Remind me to explain how before you post. If it fails, I'll accept it anyway.
+4@ThomasRoderick I will be targeting AI planes that you can lock onto.
+3@ThomasRoderick cruise missiles range from around 500kg to around 7500kg in mass, 800km/h to 5500km/h, and are generally very soft targets. However, you usually need a decent-size fragmentation warhead for them to increase chances of hitting.
+2@MTakach I really don't like workin on other people's builds. As for tips, i suggest trying to replicate techniques used by other users. I'm not sure which one would suit you best.
@ThomasRoderick thanks for the praise.
+2@MTakach yeah, I'd say I'm pretty good with ships.
@ThomasRoderick I will try to take appropriate target for the system (a byplane for early guns, cruise missiles for anti-missile systems... ) and will test without mods.
+4@Shippy456 one goes to the entry. The rest are up to you, but must be your builds. You can't transfer them to other users.
+2@WaffleCakes such build will be accepted. But weapon itself will need to have required 150 parts.
@Strikefighter04 I'll be allowing old chassis though. But air defence system must be brand new.
+3@Strikefighter04 yup. Forgot to mention that, didn't I... Gonna fix that in a second. Thanks for telling me.
@Strikefighter04 yup. Made it a few days ago.
@ChiyomiAnzai yup. Just talked to Andrew about it.
Your post has been removed as it is a copy of this post. It is not enough that you repaint a build to call it your own. Please follow the rules. You have been issued a strike for bypassing the successor system.
@D0M1N420R no problem buddy. It's a great looking build.
Very nice plane, although a bit too maneuverable. I think you should give it a proper description.
@AerialFighterSnakes woops, I forgot about it. I'll see to post it these days if I don't forget again.
Use structural wings in custom control surfaces.
+4@JediWolf congratulations on that buddy.
+1@TTFH what are functional changes? I see a bunch of parts got removed, which isn't a significant enough change.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed as spam. You can practice typing on an unlisted post.
@Kweed10 that was another account of a banned user AchuTMM. It has been detected and removed.
+3@Vidal99977 thanks.
All this is in the rules already.
@Sgtk no problem.
@MrSilverWolf thanks :)
Not bad. Cockpit view is obstructed though. Also, I'd expect a bit better gliding performance from a plane with such huge wings.
@Kimcotupan15 at least I haven't build Nebo M radar system. Jump to around 21:40 to see the definition of a "lot of moving parts".
+1It works pretty well. I don't think mobile folk will be able to use it without a gun attached somewhere, as FireGuns button only shows up on mobile when there actually is a gun. I suggest posting an unlisted version with a gun and putting a link to it in description.
@enzoBoeing757 yes, red are moderators, blue are devs.
@TUNDERTEAM np
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.
Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.