247k EternalDarkness Comments

  • Avenger 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • V-22 weaponized and upgraded 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • [PREDATOR] air defence system 6.2 years ago

    @Abhishek700 sure. I'll rate one entry per user. You can post as many successors as you want and pick which one is your entry.

    +1
  • Air Defence Challenge [CLOSED] 6.2 years ago

    @GeneralOliverVonBismarck excellent. Thank you.

  • [PREDATOR] air defence system 6.2 years ago

    @Abhishek700 yes. It can replace what used to be on the chassis. For example, you have an APC. You remove its turret and put air defence system there. Or you already have a truck and you put system on it. Even if I rate the air defence system here while disregarding the rest, it's not really a winner material. I suggest making an actual system for area air defence.

    +1
  • [PREDATOR] air defence system 6.2 years ago

    So, it's got air defence system for self defence while being an offensive ground attack system. Still doesn't fit the challenge.

    +1
  • Advanced Tie fighter 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • Upgraded Orca Fighter 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • Su-25 Frogfoot 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • S-D81X CubicBuster-Y 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • [Orca] Concept Fighter-VTOL SCRAPPED(DO NOT DOWNLOAD)(CRAP) 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here

  • C-23 Sherpa 6.2 years ago

    @FENRIRpapapa that would require XML editing. However, you can take dragless parts from my builds.

  • C-23 Sherpa 6.2 years ago

    @FENRIRpapapa no problem. However, I was expecting a lot more from this build. Simple builds like this one usually have good performance, but this one doesn't. You have too much drag, forcing you to use way too much power for achieving realistic top speed. That means you have extreme acceleration and climb rate, unrealistic for a plane like this. Also, it pitches down even at full speed and takeoff speed is too high. To fix these issues, I advise reducing drag a lot, reducing engine power to get the same max speed, and moving CoM back by removing mass from the front (adding mass in the back would further increase takeoff speed).

    +2
  • M.Corp UH-2O/A 6.2 years ago

    @alextractor08 there are two fixed versions linked in description.

  • Oberon Class Submarine 6.2 years ago

    @MintLynx no problem buddy.

  • Oberon Class Submarine 6.2 years ago

    Pro tip: zoom in on your upload pictures so that the build covers as much of the screen as possible. Nice sub though.

    +1
  • Tracks 2 bug report page. 6.2 years ago

    @Baby no problem.

  • Tracks 2 bug report page. 6.2 years ago

    @Baby the way described in the beta post, shift+k.

  • Milano 6.2 years ago

    @gingerbreadman the build needs to be significantly changed to be a valid successor. Also, with hundreds of thousands of builds on the site, I don't think anyone will miss this one too much.

  • [PREDATOR] air defence system 6.2 years ago

    @Abhishek700 ok. That might save it.

  • [PREDATOR] air defence system 6.2 years ago

    @Abhishek700 then it's not a dedicated air defence system. It's better equipped for ground attack.

  • Milano 6.2 years ago

    A copy is still a copy, even when the account that posted the original no longer exists. Please read the rules so you don't accidentally get yourself into an unpleasant situation. I won't issue you a strike for this, as I believe you didn't mean to do anything bad.

  • [PREDATOR] air defence system 6.2 years ago

    @Abhishek700 no problem. It's a good looking build. However, I don't think it would be a practical air defence system, so I won't rate it. Its size would make it easy target, gun is too big for the role, and it doesn't seem to have its own radar, which is unusual for anti-aircraft mobile gun systems.

  • Tracks 2 bug report page. 6.2 years ago

    Here are conclusions after brief testing:

    • A lot better than the old Tracks mod. A pair of tracks can now turn the build in place, as they should, new options are great, allowing us to make them look like almost any real tracks. Maybe even like any real tracks.

    • Tracks aren't responding to brake input. I can not make the vehicle stop unless I'm balancing reverse and forward input.

    • Springs and damper sliders should allow more strength. I tested the tracks on a 7.5t build, and it squished them quite a bit on max spring and damper.

    • On the same test, build had tendency to go forward on its own after I stop it. The build is heavier at the front than in the rear, squishing front of the tracks more.

    +3
  • Sailing yacht Angela 6.2 years ago

    @JetEngine2709 thanks.

  • M.CorpCWS PB1 Flame 6.2 years ago

    Btw, while making significant changes to a build and then posting it is fine, it'll never land you a significant number of upvotes. I advise dissecting existing builds and learning how to make good stuff yourself.
    I won't issue you a strike for this one, as I know you didn't mean anything bad.

  • M.CorpCWS PB1 Flame 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • Just gonna leave this here. 6.2 years ago

    @KingHandspider that's good to know.

    +1
  • Just gonna leave this here. 6.2 years ago

    @KingHandspider you called out another user, and complained about being blocked by another user. Also, screenshots you posted contain excessive profanity.

  • Just gonna leave this here. 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. You have been issued a strike.

  • helicopter, what is the .... (alt) setting 6.2 years ago

    Alternative inputs. They are useful for multi=rotor helicopters.

    +1
  • Hello. It’s a me. Mario 6.2 years ago

    @NoobMaster69 I have also removed your bio in such a way that you can write a new one. It contained excessive profanity. Please read the rules.

  • Now I understand why nobody plays multiplayer (mini-rant) 6.2 years ago

    @IStoleYourMeme watch your language. Your comment has been removed.

    +3
  • M.Corp AH-1 Mamba 6.2 years ago

    @Yoyoyooo I'm glad you like it.

  • M.Corp AH-1 Mamba 6.2 years ago

    @Yoyoyooo that was the inspiration behind this build.

  • 6.2 years ago

    @Chancey21 only flaw I found is that rudder rotator isn't at the correct angle.

    +1
  • 6.2 years ago

    Good job. Great paint scheme, very nice performance.

  • Hello. It’s a me. Mario 6.2 years ago

    This post has nothing to do with SP or its community.

  • Hello. It’s a me. Mario 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam.

  • M.Corp M-300i Skycat 6.2 years ago

    @Davisplanez thanks.

  • Learjet 45 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • P-51D-15-NAA 6.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed. Please read these rules about posting planes.
    Please try to make major changes to a plane before posting it. Simply painting an object a different color, or adding a few guns is not enough to consider it your own. In the future please credit the original maker, and try to post your own work.

  • M.Corp UH-2O/A 6.2 years ago

    @MailboxIsMyGender aww, thanks :)

    +2
  • A Dying breed 6.2 years ago

    @BlueCitrus exactly.

  • Robinette-Class Destroyer 6.2 years ago

    No problem.

  • Picador(Ryder's Car) - GTA San Andreas 6.2 years ago

    @Wr25 makes me happy to hear that. Thanks.

  • A Dying breed 6.2 years ago

    @BlueCitrus it won't get removed. It is related to aviation and doesn't depict another game.

    +4
  • Tutorial : How to make a plane not a sucessor of another plane or vice versa [BRAND NEW DISCOVERY] 6.2 years ago

    You may want to mention thst build must be reloaded from the list of saved builds for the change to tske effect.

  • Sapience Tech "Sweeper" ADS Mk.I 6.2 years ago

    @ThomasRoderick thanks for the entry.

    +2
  • M.Corp UH-2O/A 6.2 years ago

    @Sutairs :3