247k EternalDarkness Comments

  • Lada 4.2 years ago

    @BagelPlane sure.

  • IKEA 4.2 years ago

    @LightningTreeSavor upvotes cannot be transferred from one build to another. I can make this a successor to the challenge if you want.

  • North American RA-5C Vigilante 4.2 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 sure.

  • MCAS Argus 4.2 years ago

    @Locurapuntocom of course, as long as you give proper credit.

  • Bellow 100 part Challange [CLOSED] 4.2 years ago

    @HanSeuluh very well. Thank you for cooperation. Have you tried resetting your password via email? I think there's a mechanism for that. It could come in handy if you ever decide to return for a bit.
    @JuanAlt @asteroidbook345 @Default4 it's not nice to be jumping to conclusions and to call out a user when his guild hasn't been proven. You may have noticed that even I asked the user for clarification and issued a warning, having not banned them immediately.

    +1
  • Bellow 100 part Challange [CLOSED] 4.2 years ago

    Leaving a challenge unrated is against the rules. If you do not publish the ratings within two days, the challenge will be removed, along with all successor points, and you will be temporarily banned from the site.

    +2
  • BMT-150G Bullfrog Medium Tank 4.2 years ago

    @MuizTheMobileFriendly I can when I have a link or the code of the challenge post.

  • LTV A-7E Corsair II (Ling-Temco-Vought) 4.2 years ago

    @HelloHelloTheUnt I can do something close to that. I linked it to the repost of the original build.

  • IKEA Kallax Shelf 4.2 years ago

    @Default4 sure.

  • RMS Carpathia 4.2 years ago

    Incredible work. She's beautiful.

    +2
  • MiG-29M Single Seater (no mod) 4.2 years ago

    @Dung6517 you're welcome.

  • GR-NS 02 Borealis II 4.2 years ago

    @Sadboye12 it's not forbidden. However, it is pointless, in my opinion. Upvotes are, in a way, a "thank you" for posting a build.

    +2
  • GR-NS 02 Borealis II 4.2 years ago

    @Sadboye12 why would you ping mods? What do they have to do with this?

    +1
  • MiG-29M Single Seater (no mod) 4.2 years ago

    @Dung6517 in that case, I'll leave this one removed and you keep the new one. Always list your changes on successor builds.

  • Q&A with EternalDarkness 4.2 years ago

    @DeltaBravoSix of course I do. Properly made meat burek is great, especially with our kind of yogurt.

  • MiG-29M Single Seater (no mod) 4.2 years ago

    @Dung6517 ok, I'll leave it up then.

  • Q&A with EternalDarkness 4.2 years ago

    @DeltaBravoSix no idea.

  • MiG-29M Single Seater (no mod) 4.2 years ago

    @Dung6517 you seem to have only added two stock weapons. Just because the original is unlisted, it doesn't mean you can claim it as yours. Besides, original was published, you just found the unlisted backup and used it.

  • The Emblem of the Communist Party of China 4.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here

    +1
  • First person to comment ill name a tank after you :) 4.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed as spam. Please keep your forum posts in the forum section of the site.

  • A-4E Skyhawk 4.2 years ago

    @2Papi2Chulo sure. Code is always helpful, as it saves me a few clicks.

  • KpfPzW VI Eroberer 4.2 years ago

    @WingsOfSteel done.

  • McDonnell Douglas A-4M Skyhawk 4.2 years ago

    @Fox00One sure.

  • Old jet engine 4.2 years ago

    @LightningTreeSavor it's as obsolete as this engine. You ought to get a bit into fuselage blocks.

    +1
  • RJ Hydra MKII 4.2 years ago

    @RamboJutter I don't see the nose width as the problem. I don't think you have the length for such a large engine.

  • RJ Hydra MKII 4.2 years ago

    Very nice heavy fighter. I like the design. I assume both engines are behind the cockpit, as there's not enough room for a V12 in the nose.

  • Q&A with EternalDarkness 4.2 years ago

    @RPC3503 giving credit in description is recommended.

  • Old jet engine 4.2 years ago

    @LightningTreeSavor took you long enough XD

  • Saddam Hussein 4.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here

    +1
  • [PINNED] List Of Discord Servers 4.2 years ago

    @HadesHadestheWeeb of course.

  • TLV-M RM-1 4.2 years ago

    @PapaKernels yes.

  • [PINNED] List Of Discord Servers 4.2 years ago

    @rexzion ok, make one.

  • D.V.A VN-46 (Trandafir Negru) 4.2 years ago

    @Neenyboy that happens sometimes. I'll fix it.

  • Lockheed U-2R 4.2 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 ok

  • WW2 torpedo boat 4.2 years ago

    Why not give it a proper name? It's a good build.

  • jian dang 100 4.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here

  • Aircraft 4.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here

  • E-25 4.2 years ago

    @ToxyPilot ok.

  • E-25 4.2 years ago

    @ToxyPilot I need you to provide a link to your original.

  • The 100th Anniversary 4.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here

  • this propeller is illegal 4.2 years ago

    This engine was removed from the menu as obsolete when newer, more customizable prop engines arrived. I guess it's still good for ww1 planes.

    +6
  • Why the cri-cri is a better plane than the Rafale 4.2 years ago

    @CharlesDeGaulle they will stop when they see that nobody cares.

    +3
  • Why the cri-cri is a better plane than the Rafale 4.2 years ago

    @CharlesDeGaulle will you stop this? You're spreading drama all over the site. People don't like your favorite plane, you don't like theirs, and that's that.

    +7
  • THE FIRST PILOTS 4.2 years ago

    @CharlesDeGaulle2 F104Deathtrap wanted to block you, but you were quicker. You may not have known that at the time of making your comment, so I will not enforce the rule about bypassing the block. From now on, I will consider the block to be mutual, and the rule about bypassing the block will be in power, so please do not try to contact F104 again on the site. If you have no other purpose for this alt, I'd like to ask you to delete it.

    +8
  • 100 years of the CPC 4.2 years ago

    Your post has been removed because it appears to have broken the website rules. You can read them here

  • Rafale VS F35, F15, F18 and F16 4.2 years ago

    @KnightOfRen of course he is.

    +4
  • Rafale VS F35, F15, F18 and F16 4.2 years ago

    @KnightOfRen try to view his profile and tell me how it went.

  • Rafale VS F35, F15, F18 and F16 4.2 years ago

    @KnightOfRen your comment has been removed. Putting "[REDACTED]" in a place of an obvious curse word, with intent of insulting a user, is still against the rules.

    +1
  • 1969 Dodge Daytona four wheel drive 4.2 years ago

    @PlaneWrecker ok.

  • A bad guy 4.2 years ago

    To elaborate on Vincent's message:
    You really didn't need to make a post calling out a user for stating his opinion on a specific aircraft. Leaving your counter-opinion on his post in a polite manner would have sufficed. Please refrain from escalating such small matters in the future.