@WNP78 do they not despawn like all other weapons? Torpedoes stop existing at a certain depth, and so do bombs and other weapons. I only haven't tried with rockets.
@ErvenDynamics maybe, but it would be impossible to hit anything. And they would disappear when you dive, like all other weapons. For some reason, they all despawn at some 20m depth, barely enough for the submarine to be submerged.
@Hawkeye156 I have experimented with better suspensions. Unfortunately, they have proven worse in the field, not giving satisfactory performance. What I mean with my previous comment is: you don't need the round part under the front end of the boat. Fast boats have sharp fronts to cut through water. Only big and slow ships need that part to negate some drag.
Regardless of your statement, welcome. It's one thing to haunt the site without the account, and a whole different one to communicate with your favorite builders, give and receive feedback, and make online friends. I hope we'll also see plenty of good builds from you.
You seem to be stuck on the word "normal". There is one of only a handful of quotes that I appreciate, that says "Normal is an illusion. What is normal for the spider is chaos for the fly.". As for justice, we all have our views of justice. It's a made up thing, like a hole in the doughnut. "We want justice, which means we want the guy we consider bad to gain nothing from his years of hard work". I bet his justice is far different than that.
Flaps always point down. They are not pitch control surfaces. Their job is to increase lift by adding chamber to the wing profile at the cost of drag. The plane you got is not realistically designed. Probably some kind of artists idea of what a supersonic airliner is supposed to look like. CoL would be too far back. Those wings are copied from a conventional airliner, so surfaces you have marked would be flaps.
Most of the guys who made good swashplates have left the game over time. The rest of us just don't wanna bother with bugs, glitches, and complex helicopter aerodynamics.
You did with that trijet what I don't think anyone has done before. You made a good airliner that everyone can use. I would love to see a few more low part large aircraft from you.
Surprisingly low part count for an airliner. They usually have more than thousand of parts. Landing gear is a bit stiff, and the plane seems to be a bit underpowered, but it's still very nice.
You have a nice design, good maneuverability, and great cockpit here. However, this plane is overpowered, and you have some kind of thrust vectoring set to the same input as flaps.
@ThunderscreechEngineering that is possible. However, Russia claims to have evidence in British involvement in the gas attack. Of course, we will probably never know for sure. It smells like it's all going to plan for both US and Russia. And that people of Syria are again means for some foreign politicians to settle their disputes over money.
It's a pre-arranged scenario. Notice how the "chemical attack" happened just days after allied coalition said that they will attack if there's a chemical attack. They apparently did just that. However, when you look into some details known so far, Syrian military airport seems to have been evacuated days before the attack, and that chemical plants (if they were even actual chemical plants) were cleared of chemicals and personnel. This we can conclude from the lack of reported victims and chemical fallout. Also, they aimed as far from the Russian positions as they could, and Emmanuel Macron said that Russia was informed in advance.
Why I doubt that there was an actual chemical attack? Well, just look at the video of cleaning up its aftermath. They are sanitising the area and affected people with water instead of appropriate chemicals for neutralising the poison. Also, nobody is wearing a gas mask or any other protective equipment.
I come from a country that is mostly neutral in this matter, and my informations mostly come from our national network, so I consider them reliable. I have also done a brief research on the internet to compare them to other sources.
@JohnnyBoythePilot no problem. Just nudge that tail properly next time. There's enough room between the fuselage and horizontal stabilizers to park another plane.
@BlazeInfinity sleeping, I guess.
+1@LuukPlanes not as far as I know, unfortunately.
@WNP78 I'll have that in mind.
@LuukPlanes sure. But I don't think it can be done. Torpedoes and rockets can work up to a certain depth, but even they disappear if you go deeper.
@WNP78 do they not despawn like all other weapons? Torpedoes stop existing at a certain depth, and so do bombs and other weapons. I only haven't tried with rockets.
@AstonMartin145 by pistons that extend very far. Those pistons have tiny floating blocks and a tiny VTOL engine on them.
@ErvenDynamics maybe, but it would be impossible to hit anything. And they would disappear when you dive, like all other weapons. For some reason, they all despawn at some 20m depth, barely enough for the submarine to be submerged.
@BogdanX that didn't occur to me O.o. I'll have it on my next sub.
@RailfanEthan @Epicboss77 thanks.
@Razor3278 @LEOPARDtec @Sgtk thanks.
@Hawkeye156 I have experimented with better suspensions. Unfortunately, they have proven worse in the field, not giving satisfactory performance. What I mean with my previous comment is: you don't need the round part under the front end of the boat. Fast boats have sharp fronts to cut through water. Only big and slow ships need that part to negate some drag.
+2Bulbous bow is excessive on a vessel of this kind. Everything else is nice. Good job.
@Newplanewhodis no problem.
@Newplanewhodis there's no need for that. I have a lot of points and followers already. Just enjoy my builds.
@Newplanewhodis sure.
Regardless of your statement, welcome. It's one thing to haunt the site without the account, and a whole different one to communicate with your favorite builders, give and receive feedback, and make online friends. I hope we'll also see plenty of good builds from you.
@A3 I already have way too many planes of that kind. I think someone has made one of those already.
+1Interesting idea.
+2@dukegillian sure. Just give credit, or keep it a successor if you use a lot of it.
@LatteCoffee55 lol
Nice engine. I haven't seen you in a while. How's it going?
@RedstoneAeroAviation 0.5. One old, square block.
+1AI spawns planes wit low part count, so it doesn't lag your game. This plane is simple enough for the job.
Make a custom crosshair and nudge it 0.5m (one block) above the camera.
You seem to be stuck on the word "normal". There is one of only a handful of quotes that I appreciate, that says "Normal is an illusion. What is normal for the spider is chaos for the fly.". As for justice, we all have our views of justice. It's a made up thing, like a hole in the doughnut. "We want justice, which means we want the guy we consider bad to gain nothing from his years of hard work". I bet his justice is far different than that.
3
@RailfanEthan great. What did it look like when you started? Really bad or just heavily used?
@RailfanEthan no problem. Good luck with the restauration. Send more pictures when it's done.
@Franticmatty next time you feature my build on a video, send me a link please. I love to see my stuff being used.
Flaps always point down. They are not pitch control surfaces. Their job is to increase lift by adding chamber to the wing profile at the cost of drag. The plane you got is not realistically designed. Probably some kind of artists idea of what a supersonic airliner is supposed to look like. CoL would be too far back. Those wings are copied from a conventional airliner, so surfaces you have marked would be flaps.
+3Most of the guys who made good swashplates have left the game over time. The rest of us just don't wanna bother with bugs, glitches, and complex helicopter aerodynamics.
You did with that trijet what I don't think anyone has done before. You made a good airliner that everyone can use. I would love to see a few more low part large aircraft from you.
If Jundroo took their time to read all of this when they were making SP, we'd have much better airport experience.
+2It looks very nice. Good job.
@SledDriver I have suggested that on Uservoice ages ago.
+1I have had this problem with early versions of a ballistic missile I was making. I don't know how I got around it.
+1Surprisingly low part count for an airliner. They usually have more than thousand of parts. Landing gear is a bit stiff, and the plane seems to be a bit underpowered, but it's still very nice.
+5You have a nice design, good maneuverability, and great cockpit here. However, this plane is overpowered, and you have some kind of thrust vectoring set to the same input as flaps.
+1WNP discovered that ages ago. I have used it on a few builds to reduce apparent drag, but never as propulsion.
+2Great job man. It's perfect.
@FENRIRpapapa no problem.
@ThunderscreechEngineering that is possible. However, Russia claims to have evidence in British involvement in the gas attack. Of course, we will probably never know for sure. It smells like it's all going to plan for both US and Russia. And that people of Syria are again means for some foreign politicians to settle their disputes over money.
No problem.
Awesome work, man. I can't run this build on my laptop, but pictures alone are enough for a spotlight.
@SledDriver still, it is interesting.
+1Very interesting shape. I like it.
@Botfinder @BaconAircraft @AircroftDesigin read below please. I forgot to tag you.
It's a pre-arranged scenario. Notice how the "chemical attack" happened just days after allied coalition said that they will attack if there's a chemical attack. They apparently did just that. However, when you look into some details known so far, Syrian military airport seems to have been evacuated days before the attack, and that chemical plants (if they were even actual chemical plants) were cleared of chemicals and personnel. This we can conclude from the lack of reported victims and chemical fallout. Also, they aimed as far from the Russian positions as they could, and Emmanuel Macron said that Russia was informed in advance.
+1Why I doubt that there was an actual chemical attack? Well, just look at the video of cleaning up its aftermath. They are sanitising the area and affected people with water instead of appropriate chemicals for neutralising the poison. Also, nobody is wearing a gas mask or any other protective equipment.
I come from a country that is mostly neutral in this matter, and my informations mostly come from our national network, so I consider them reliable. I have also done a brief research on the internet to compare them to other sources.
@DAHL4444 try reducing settings. My Galaxy S5 can run it.
@JohnnyBoythePilot no problem. Just nudge that tail properly next time. There's enough room between the fuselage and horizontal stabilizers to park another plane.