Very nice! Good job!
However, there's a little issue. The real 737-300 has small windows above the main windows of the cockpit, and you missed it. But, this doesn't decrease the plane's quality at all!
Put the terrain and shadows settings to medium, there almost won't be any difference. Also reduce the water and aircraft reflections quality to low, it won't have a big impact too.
Some parts lag more. For example, my phone can handle 300 parts like it's nothing, but lagged with my A-10 Thunderbolt II (see my profile page's first plane) which only had around 180 parts. That's because most of them were weapons. Weapons and gizmos take more power than wings and wings take more power than dumb fuselage blocks.
Its not because your planes are bad. They are actually quite good. You just need to write descriptions that make the viewer want to download your craft.
About the airfoils, yes you always want the most lift, but flat bottom produces more drag than semi symmetric and semi symmetric produces more drag than symmetric. You must find the perfect balance between lift and drag, because more drag means less top speed. For light and fast planes, e.g. fighter jets, i recommend symmetric airfoil, for medium size planes, e.g. business jets, small airliners, i recommend semi symmetric, and for small and slow propeller planes (cessna, cirrus) and thicc fat boys (antonov 225) use flat bottom.
The rear spoiler/wing is way too high and long. Make it lower and also shorter, approx. as long as the wheels are wide it'll be a lot more realistic-looking. Other than that, it is pretty cool!
Thanks for your quick reply and rating, @PapaKernels !
I'm back on SimplePlanes and this is my entry for this challenge: https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/e3p6z0/Genavda-G-35S
@PapaKernels
@DumbPlaneMaker Sorry, I'll be inactive for some time (I don't know how long), but if I return before 20th of March I'll enter.
Can I modify the weight and drag with Overload?
Great! I'm in!
Very nice! Good job!
However, there's a little issue. The real 737-300 has small windows above the main windows of the cockpit, and you missed it. But, this doesn't decrease the plane's quality at all!
How do you make them waterproof? Is there a such option in Overload?
What do you want me to make next? Tell me here in the comments!
This bomb just ate a P-51 Mustang.
HELL YEAH
I landed safely without breaking that prop thing
Thanks for ALL upvotes! )
I'm late, but...
Airbus-CASA 295 maybe?
Thanks for the upvote and spotlight, @Jesse201 !
Thanks for all upvotes, spotlight and follow, @realXAircraftManufacturer !
Put the terrain and shadows settings to medium, there almost won't be any difference. Also reduce the water and aircraft reflections quality to low, it won't have a big impact too.
Some parts lag more. For example, my phone can handle 300 parts like it's nothing, but lagged with my A-10 Thunderbolt II (see my profile page's first plane) which only had around 180 parts. That's because most of them were weapons. Weapons and gizmos take more power than wings and wings take more power than dumb fuselage blocks.
This is REALLY good! I was working on a project like this with the Frecce Tricolori planes but abandoned it after lots of bugs.
I'd like to see imaginations of Boeing 797... Maybe you can do it?
Normal airliners apply 60 - 90 % off throttle during take off, maybe they accelerate slower because of this.
UAV, but why does it have cockpit?
Anyway, nice build!
Kind of strange-looking but very good!
@CaptainRex123 Yes, but you're too late)
Cute
Kamikaze budget cuts
How did you find those little old props?
@LeonardorHD1 Ok! I'll start building it today.
@Vukasin123king I have decent skills with XML. If you have the Overload mod, I can get you started.
Very detailed cockpit and only 235 parts. Man you are unbeatable!
@Vukasin123king Anyway, they are pretty nice!
Approaching gold!
I made a 1100+ parts Antonov 124 on my Android a while ago but didn't post it because it was so laggy that I couldn't test its performance
Hell yeah I saw it :-D
This plane thing's wake turbulence vs Cessna 172
@SimpleSquareManufacturer CRJ 737 Neo maybe?
What should I make next? Tell me in the comments!
@BloodFart Windows 9 doesn't exist, it can't hurt you
Dude yo
What should I make next? Maybe a controllable USS Beast? Or a controllable Missile Launcher in Snowstone? Let me know here in the comments!
WhAt
ThE
HeLL
Its not because your planes are bad. They are actually quite good. You just need to write descriptions that make the viewer want to download your craft.
Eggplane Concorde or Blackbird!
About the airfoils, yes you always want the most lift, but flat bottom produces more drag than semi symmetric and semi symmetric produces more drag than symmetric. You must find the perfect balance between lift and drag, because more drag means less top speed. For light and fast planes, e.g. fighter jets, i recommend symmetric airfoil, for medium size planes, e.g. business jets, small airliners, i recommend semi symmetric, and for small and slow propeller planes (cessna, cirrus) and thicc fat boys (antonov 225) use flat bottom.
Center of mass is too far in the rear
Add fuel or dead weight in the front
more eco friendly than ever...
saw this just after destroyed its propellers in ace combat 7 mission 3
The rear spoiler/wing is way too high and long. Make it lower and also shorter, approx. as long as the wheels are wide it'll be a lot more realistic-looking. Other than that, it is pretty cool!
Looks super weird. But your model is very cool, and has potential!