You can find plenty of Planes all over the internet that are faster and better than an armed tutorial plane, like go check out my Super Sniper V2 @JasperH
Yeah, I hate to be redundant, but this little voice in the back of my head is saying “this is a terrible idea” and then there’s this louder voice saying “SHOW THEM THE BIG GUNS!!!”, so I just need to show off this plane. However, it will be listed underneath my RG version, and not your original Skycat. @EternalDarkness
The purpose of the strike cat version was is to be a light attack aircraft/ close air support/ recon aircraft. It’s not intended to travel fast, as it needs to do recon, and I can easily make the fuel load better via drop tanks. Could I at least do the StrikeCat?@EternalDarkness
Since your plane was such a success, we here at CAM were wondering if we could build some more variations of your M-300I Skycat. Here’s what they will be:
M-300 Strikecat (close air support/ recon version)
M-300 Catfish (float plane)
M-300 Wildcat (rough terrain landing version)
The last one may be unnecessary, especially since your original version seems to already have it down. Just wondering if I could do this. If not, I totally understand. @EternalDarkness
Thanks for the offer, but I think I’ll stick to modifying tanks/ trying to make Armoured cars. However, I’ll definitely consider. Also, I will soon be releasing a TD version of the highly successful AC-1A. As a side note from that, I also already have 2 variations of the AC-1A, named the AC-1B and AC-1C. Judging by the fact that your profile is a tank and that we’re talking about tanks, I think you should check those out! @SuperSix
Thanks. It’s only meant to be an Armored car, and only able to stand up to small arms fire. However, it’s a little on the bulky side, and has the silhouette of an M3 Lee. (If you know what I mean.) @SuperSix
Wow this is great. And it’s another one of many vehicle designs on SP that show why we at CustomAircraftMods are not very skilled with AFV’s. (Insert picture of T-23 AC here)
Your upgraded preformance version is done. It’s on my account, but not listed. @Solarisaircraft
Do a in-depth report please @Spacedoge12345plane
Do you think you could do one on my F7F TurboProp? @Spacedoge12345plane
Will do @DankDorito
R.I.P my T-23’s representation
You can find plenty of Planes all over the internet that are faster and better than an armed tutorial plane, like go check out my Super Sniper V2 @JasperH
Hmmm, so... no preformance issues? Like make it a stunt version? @DankDorito
Your plane is ready! (And uploaded) @Solarisaircraft
What do you want me to do to this? It’s already perfect! @DankDorito
Ok thanks! @Spacedoge12345plane
Ok@Nerfenthusiast
I’ll try my very best! @DankDorito
WOW MUCH UPVOTE ok, will do @Spacedoge12345plane
I mean which plane? @Nerfenthusiast
doomsday intensifies
The general Aviation one is already done for me (I can’t do cockpits) but I will do the Sable-Advance @Solarisaircraft
Sure, what is it? @Nerfenthusiast
Oh ok@BlackhattAircraft
Oh, my bad. Sorry about that. 😕@randomusername
Will the Beta eventually come as an Update when all bugs are fixed?
RIP @randomusername
+1Russian Rip-off of true Concorde... I have mixed feelings.
+1It’s fine! No problem. @AdlerSteiner
Nice. The cutting edge of Soviet Ingenuity! @getorge
+1I understand, aren’t we all. @darkhawk138
+1Thanks! @darkhawk138
Yes lol @Tank6376
Yes Rest in Pepperoni @EternalDarkness
Very good. It’s the flying typewriter!
I’ve decided just to call off the entire project. Here were the issues:
StrikeCat- landing gear troubles
Catfish- could not put in a new engine
Wildcat- never built; cancelled @EternalDarkness
Well keep up the good work! If you need an auto cannon, just tell me and I can get you a 20mm auto cannon. @AdlerSteiner
Yeah, I hate to be redundant, but this little voice in the back of my head is saying “this is a terrible idea” and then there’s this louder voice saying “SHOW THEM THE BIG GUNS!!!”, so I just need to show off this plane. However, it will be listed underneath my RG version, and not your original Skycat. @EternalDarkness
Yeah what about PZ 3?
The purpose of the strike cat version was is to be a light attack aircraft/ close air support/ recon aircraft. It’s not intended to travel fast, as it needs to do recon, and I can easily make the fuel load better via drop tanks. Could I at least do the StrikeCat?@EternalDarkness
Thanks, but I just added the Howitzer. The original tank is by someone else. @SuperSix
Np @SuperSix
Since your plane was such a success, we here at CAM were wondering if we could build some more variations of your M-300I Skycat. Here’s what they will be:
M-300 Strikecat (close air support/ recon version)
M-300 Catfish (float plane)
M-300 Wildcat (rough terrain landing version)
The last one may be unnecessary, especially since your original version seems to already have it down. Just wondering if I could do this. If not, I totally understand. @EternalDarkness
Thanks for the offer, but I think I’ll stick to modifying tanks/ trying to make Armoured cars. However, I’ll definitely consider. Also, I will soon be releasing a TD version of the highly successful AC-1A. As a side note from that, I also already have 2 variations of the AC-1A, named the AC-1B and AC-1C. Judging by the fact that your profile is a tank and that we’re talking about tanks, I think you should check those out! @SuperSix
Thanks. It’s only meant to be an Armored car, and only able to stand up to small arms fire. However, it’s a little on the bulky side, and has the silhouette of an M3 Lee. (If you know what I mean.) @SuperSix
Very true. @SuperSix
Wow this is great. And it’s another one of many vehicle designs on SP that show why we at CustomAircraftMods are not very skilled with AFV’s. (Insert picture of T-23 AC here)
Never heard of this series before. Probably an older show. Nice replica of the original though!
Thanks! @EternalDarkness
So, what do you think of the plane modifications? (Other than the front gear)@EternalDarkness
and this everybody, is why we don’t make afv’s :D
No problem. It bothers me to see people put so much effort into something, but not get much out of it. @RUBICS
Wow! Lots of your planes have great potential! I’ll do some of your planes! @TitanIncorporated
Sweet. @jamesPLANESii
“Cuz why not?” Lol XD
THIS IS MOST DEFINITELY AN ELECTRONIC WARFARE CRAFT!
+1It was originally going to be a Search and Rescue Aircraft, but I changed my mind and forgot to change the colors @Benny3053