Sorry yeah I’ve been out of the whole building thing for awhile. A new jet and prop plane is inbound, sorry for all the delay. However, if no new builds appear, use the Nova@Fpssuc
This one is severely broken, and pitches down violently after takeoff. If anything, do the FreightFox 2 today, and the AC-49 Warfox tomorrow. (It’s a gunship) @Fpssuc
It will be almost a whole different aircraft. It’s bigger, heavier, and not as capable of landing in remote places. HOWEVER! It does now have a rear cargo ramp for in-flight drops. And a nose cargo door! @12705129
Thanks! Even though, this plane is sadly not exactly mine. Credit goes to SodiumChloride for the original plane. This one is just a real heavily upgraded version @ACEPILOT109
I have a question about your weekly reviews. I have a plane that was pretty popular when released, however, that was a year ago... does my plane need to be really popular and brand new to be in your weekly reviews?
How’s that cargo agency been going? XD @12705129
Nice simple design. I like it!
+1Yes sir. Sorry for the delayed responses, I’m on vacation atm @Fpssuc
+1Sorry yeah I’ve been out of the whole building thing for awhile. A new jet and prop plane is inbound, sorry for all the delay. However, if no new builds appear, use the Nova@Fpssuc
Thanks @Gott
+1But I really want you to feature the Jaguar @Fpssuc
Sorry I’m usually sleeping around the time your asking these questions, so I’m really late to answer @Fpssuc
Your welcome @Fpssuc
This one is severely broken, and pitches down violently after takeoff. If anything, do the FreightFox 2 today, and the AC-49 Warfox tomorrow. (It’s a gunship) @Fpssuc
Really, feel free to poke around my account and look at any of the planes, just make sure to read the descriptions @Fpssuc
The video is great! If you want another plane to review, look at the CAM Timber Wolf B, CAM Jaguar, or CAM Falcon @Fpssuc
Sorry if it’s late, but I don’t honestly care. I’d prefer second @Fpssuc
Noice. @Fpssuc
@Fpssuc
Hey, I’ll post a new one with working power, so use that one! @Fpssuc
Oh. My. God. HOW DID I MISS THAT!! Thanks for catching it. @FennVectorCWA
Yes pls! I’ll subscribe! @Fpssuc
When will this video be posted too?
Lol thanks 🤣 @KerlonceauxIndustries
+2What happened? Did they bring out the banhammer?@KerlonceauxIndustries
I can’t dm you on discord anymore @KerlonceauxIndustries
@KerlonceauxIndustries
You still there? Or have you just left me?
No problem! @12705129
I am also working on a weaponized version myself actually @BlackSkyGunner
@12705129 here’s a new plane for your KCA
It will be almost a whole different aircraft. It’s bigger, heavier, and not as capable of landing in remote places. HOWEVER! It does now have a rear cargo ramp for in-flight drops. And a nose cargo door! @12705129
You can! Just hold your horses for a bit. A 🅱️ Version is in the works with a rear cargo ramp and better in-flight stability! @12705129
Yeah, it’s caught a few people offgaurd I bet
@AerialFighterSnakes
That’s the point! This plane is meant to be a turboprop version of the original. It’s meant to be powerful like that. @AerialFighterSnakes
Ill probably make a B version, and I’ll definitely take that into consideration! @Mustang51
Magnificent! Sadly, my IPad can’t handle any creation over 600-700 parts, let alone, a 3000 PART SHIP?? Amazing tho.
+1Game carrier!
Thanks for reading it actually! 😅 @ACEPILOT109
Thanks! Even though, this plane is sadly not exactly mine. Credit goes to SodiumChloride for the original plane. This one is just a real heavily upgraded version @ACEPILOT109
Thanks! @Mustang51
I already got it down. Thanks for asking tho!
@EternalDarkness
So, I’m finally deciding to join back into the Simple Planes Discord server. Do you think you could verify me in the server? Thanks!
lip smack Noice.
Good to see your back! (And I’m a month late too)
Churchill Game carrier :D looks cool!
Actually... never mind... just saw the description. Yep! I have no chance in that.
I have a question about your weekly reviews. I have a plane that was pretty popular when released, however, that was a year ago... does my plane need to be really popular and brand new to be in your weekly reviews?
Nice! @ACEPILOT109
Wait. Only 284 parts? How? HOW! That is amazing! Great job!
This plane is amazing! Only thing I’d complain about is the absence of landing gear for land operations. Other than that, absolutely amazing!
No, just need the pieces to be fixed@Jakeisboss
Lol thanks! @GodZPredator616
@Nickk @MSGamezYXZ360 So how does the plane preform?
(Also sorry I forgot to add instructions)
I know. Just, dragster was an even worst one. Plus, it adds to the history. But I get where your coming from@Nickk
Very good model! Now you should make an unlisted version with a rebel paint job!
+3Honestly, yeah... the king Dragster is great at low altitudes!
.-. @RailfanEthan