@sharkysSPacc, It's a good idea, and there are quite a few concepts one could apply. But I'm not sure if it's worth the performance cost. also I find the interface for the ft too annoying to handle something this large. But if you're interested in experiencing that, you can spawn it as AI-controlled in a dogfight. You should still be able to use the gunners, even if the craft is AI-controlled.
@sharkysSPacc, I thought about making an updated version because this thing is very outdated (it's like two years old), but considering how insanely annoying the ft variable interface is I won't do that...
@brians1209, Thank you so much, man! I also have something for this challenge, but honestly, this deserves to win in my opinion! It looks like an F104 and an M.52 had a child
Well, This has 96 parts, but I built it to be fun for dogfighting, and it even features a rear gunner. Additionally, it is from a somewhat similar time period as yours
@thekingofgods, Wow, thank you for the kind words! I agree; it would probably look better if it were a bit wider. However, if I were to rebuild this, I would change up quite a few things.
@Rondine, The idea is that the prop is powered by the engine inside the plane through a driveshaft. You can see the exhaust system of the engine in the front of the plane; the thing on top is just a gearbox.
@NGC543, Nah, that English is pretty bad. What are you doing on this 4.6-year-old forum anyways?
@sharkysSPacc, It's a good idea, and there are quite a few concepts one could apply. But I'm not sure if it's worth the performance cost. also I find the interface for the ft too annoying to handle something this large. But if you're interested in experiencing that, you can spawn it as AI-controlled in a dogfight. You should still be able to use the gunners, even if the craft is AI-controlled.
+2@MobileBuilder21, thank you very much!
@sharkysSPacc, I thought about making an updated version because this thing is very outdated (it's like two years old), but considering how insanely annoying the ft variable interface is I won't do that...
+1@WinsWings, the tag didn't work for some reason
+1Great challenge as always! Very well-deserved first place in my opinion!
+1@sharkysSPacc, you don't have to stop at only one bomber formation
impressive research
+1something like this #5e2531
@FrankieTheAvi8or, thank you. I really like the profile of this plane
@ijntaihou44, thank you so much! I would love to try this in mp, but idk how to properly install mods...
+1@LonelySea22, feel free to ask questions if there are any
if you want the engine to rotate at the same rpm as the prop, you can use something like I used here
@LonelySea22, thank you very much for the credit! Super clean build btw
+1Edit: just noticed how part efficient your engine is
@CrazyCatZe, exacly what im going for, thank you!
@LonelySea22, i did
+1Love the design
+1im more interested in fictional planes to be honest, and the first one is reeeaalllyy cool!
+3@LonelySea22, I'm really appreciating all the nice words here. Did you fly the fixed version?
@WinsWings, thank you, this is actually my second attempt at this sort of cockpit, glad you like it! I hope you'll try out the fixed version
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore,Same here, I always try to incorporate it somehow.
+1@Sockdragger, right?
@ThomasRoderick, not really, I just build when I have some ideas, but im not very active...But thank you!!
+1@brians1209, glad to hear that you like it!
+1@Speedhunter, thanks you very much
There is a problem with a last second code change of the Auto Level, I updated the xml file, its Fixed
@DatTrainGuy19, oh you're right, sorry
@EternalDarkness
@phrongus
@brians1209
@Majakalona
+1@Gro
@HuskyDynamics01
@Lipton1
@Speedhunter
@HanakoSan
@brians1209, Thank you so much, man! I also have something for this challenge, but honestly, this deserves to win in my opinion! It looks like an F104 and an M.52 had a child
+1simply amazing! love the design so much
+1plen I am building
@HuskyDynamics01, glad you like It, what do you think about the paint job?
+1@Lipton1, Tankt you!
+1Im in
+1Well, This has 96 parts, but I built it to be fun for dogfighting, and it even features a rear gunner. Additionally, it is from a somewhat similar time period as yours
@Crums, it was a struggle
There is a setting called "hide instruments"; this way, you can hide the horizon.
+1@thekingofgods, Wow, thank you for the kind words! I agree; it would probably look better if it were a bit wider. However, if I were to rebuild this, I would change up quite a few things.
love the scathe, love the plane
+1amazing!
+1@MrCOPTY , sum(clamp01(Activate1)) < X if im thinking correct
+1@Rondine, The idea is that the prop is powered by the engine inside the plane through a driveshaft. You can see the exhaust system of the engine in the front of the plane; the thing on top is just a gearbox.
@WinsWings, that was such a good challenge
+1@Rondine, good to hear you like it
@WinsWings, thank you, amazing plane!
+1@Liquidfox01, The propeller was a weird design choice (I even got a bit of backlash for it), but I think it works well. Thank you
@WinsWings, Glad you enjoy it
+1@WinsWings, This means a lot coming from you, thank you!
+1