@Unwanted (sorry for the very late responce, I'm in class and just got a little free time.)
well it uses the same cockpit
similar body design compared to the B-53 (with wings not swept back)
it doesn't look like it can hit supersonic speeds like late B-53 models can. nor even transonic like the original airframe did.
also the B-53 is well preforming it is just mass produced, it flies like ass and the airframe is very old and outdated. heck the oldest models (canonly) are pushing 80 rn. the original airframe started out as a WW2 jet fighter turned into a "seaplane" for Christ's sake.
the only reason why the B-53 is still operating and being produced because is a jack of all trades for a bomber airframe. it just works it isn't pretty.
@SchmooveBrain sight is a suggestion.
hammer head forward (NS crews nickname longhood forward C39-8s that) is PEAK.
when you can see as good luck seeing jack when you got a big ass train and radiators in the way of your sight
@MetallicBeef6572 it wasn't just that people were not even helping to fix the aircraft or even bothering to give working code. after 2 days of asking I gave up and lost interest in working on it.
@Cuboidable because of that fucking radar.
i asked twice for people to fix it and the only things i got was code that wasnt working or "i will fix it (never) """"""later""""""
@Graingy finally after [REDACTED] years i can smell thanks to stacking 2 of these on top of each other. but then i remember i did this outside and near a railroad and had a consist of ALCos run by and now i have stage 7 lung cancer.
@qpdb oh wooow thanks for the help
now my radar instead of extending and not retracting, is now extending even when the aircraft is on the ground and still not retracting! slow clapping
Hey ummm this is going to sound weird but for some reason we can’t archive their Posts and this is at risk of getting taken down. Yes I know it sounds like 1984.
@XM803ENJOYER46 radars collision response is set to false.
only thing connected to the aircraft are pistons.
i will try both codes when i load up simpleplanes
@Graingy just to explain a little things about this plane. I didn’t refine the plane at all. That means modifying parts, nudging, nothing besides building the plane. The hollow fuselage part allows me to be able to shove the cockpit down without nudging at all, clever isnt it? the gear you pointed out will be fixed btw, but I will not using nudging because why the fuck not?
@EasternAviationCompany no, it just flatlined.
the gear collapsed due to the acceleration of the engine causing the plane to catch on fire and skid uncontrollably into a fuel tank and exploded
@KorKaiorWhatever it wasn't that bumpy.
the engine was well maintained (ex Air force ex other random Railway I will not name for privacy reasons) so the suspension was great. though the tracks date to 1905 and the line to the 1880s or earlier. so yeah, old tracks.
I checked his posts and comments
I got no clue what happened this time.
guess I'm gonna need to get tagged to his subreddit or whatever it is called.
ummmmm what?
@Unwanted (sorry for the very late responce, I'm in class and just got a little free time.)
well it uses the same cockpit
similar body design compared to the B-53 (with wings not swept back)
it doesn't look like it can hit supersonic speeds like late B-53 models can. nor even transonic like the original airframe did.
also the B-53 is well preforming it is just mass produced, it flies like ass and the airframe is very old and outdated. heck the oldest models (canonly) are pushing 80 rn. the original airframe started out as a WW2 jet fighter turned into a "seaplane" for Christ's sake.
the only reason why the B-53 is still operating and being produced because is a jack of all trades for a bomber airframe. it just works it isn't pretty.
WHO SET MY KEYBOARD TO DUTCH?!??
,day yd.{
rlcbcrbo rb ?P>EAJY>E+Z
@Unwanted interesting
ummmmm ok?
54 upvotes in 15 days bro fell off.
@SchmooveBrain
is that another car?
hits an oblivious protogen still going at 90 mph
OH OK-
hits a semi truck and derails
@SchmooveBrain
is that a woodpecker?
nails a family of 4 while going at 90 mph
@SchmooveBrain sight is a suggestion.
hammer head forward (NS crews nickname longhood forward C39-8s that) is PEAK.
when you can see as good luck seeing jack when you got a big ass train and radiators in the way of your sight
opinions on running Norfolk Southern GE C39-8s long hood forward?
@MetallicBeef6572 it wasn't just that people were not even helping to fix the aircraft or even bothering to give working code. after 2 days of asking I gave up and lost interest in working on it.
@Graingy radar.
holy variants.
RAILWAY GUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
@Cuboidable because of that fucking radar.
i asked twice for people to fix it and the only things i got was code that wasnt working or "i will fix it (never) """"""later""""""
i like how after i fully give up on this plane people start to bring attention to it.
@Cuboidable dont even bother.
i lost interest in this plane. im only posting it showing i give up in trying to get it fixed.
hell ues
i dunno frankly
@Graingy finally after [REDACTED] years i can smell thanks to stacking 2 of these on top of each other. but then i remember i did this outside and near a railroad and had a consist of ALCos run by and now i have stage 7 lung cancer.
@qpdb oh wooow thanks for the help
now my radar instead of extending and not retracting, is now extending even when the aircraft is on the ground and still not retracting!
slow clapping
@qpdb ummmmmm ok?
@Zero0Two2 alr (that will take a while)
@Unwanted that is all of them
@Unwanted ummmm ok?
@Zero0Two2 should i just tag you in all of the builds or should i try to get all of them into a comment
@qpdb honestly expected somebody to say that.
but it is set at 1 not zero
@Zero0Two2 well lets hope that giving context this wont get taken down.
oh and mind if i could give you my archived posts
@Zero0Two2 huh
but then why did SurpremeDelorian comment that AND delete my archive?
2 months come on explode earth we really need it
also i had an archive up and it got deleted to.
Hey ummm this is going to sound weird but for some reason we can’t archive their Posts and this is at risk of getting taken down. Yes I know it sounds like 1984.
@Graingy nothing as my nose still is clogged 24/7/365.
Is it easy to fly?
@XM803ENJOYER46 both codes didnt work.
it seems that the pistons are not retracting.
odd.
@XM803ENJOYER46 radars collision response is set to false.
only thing connected to the aircraft are pistons.
i will try both codes when i load up simpleplanes
@Graingy just to explain a little things about this plane. I didn’t refine the plane at all. That means modifying parts, nudging, nothing besides building the plane. The hollow fuselage part allows me to be able to shove the cockpit down without nudging at all, clever isnt it? the gear you pointed out will be fixed btw, but I will not using nudging because why the fuck not?
@Graingy the cockpit can’t be changed?
I think you should clarify that in the challenge rules honestly
thought POW was PLOT Armor
alright bet
@Unwanted
mmmmmmmmmmmmm
i got plans with the B-53.
i got plans
@EasternAviationCompany no, it just flatlined.
the gear collapsed due to the acceleration of the engine causing the plane to catch on fire and skid uncontrollably into a fuel tank and exploded
hell yes
still.
we want choo choos. I mean only I want trains.
ummmmm
w aht
@KorKaiorWhatever it wasn't that bumpy.
the engine was well maintained (ex Air force ex other random Railway I will not name for privacy reasons) so the suspension was great. though the tracks date to 1905 and the line to the 1880s or earlier. so yeah, old tracks.
“your planes deserve it, and so do you.” My engine testbed aircraft flatlined when I gave it this engine
@Unwanted wut