completely remove every limit on fuselage block dimensions. seriously, you have no idea how tedious it is to deal with that when paneling with super thin parts
this just means more communities (that have children in them) are gonna have to deal with this mf drawing softcore porn all over airplanes on the internet
Well the U.S. Government has control on Hawaii, and presence in Guam, and a few other places in the gulf of Mexico I'd imagine, there's a start to the list.
the experience i had trying to work this airplane was confusing and clunky. the engine startup is not clearly communicated, which the only thrust i got was pressing the burner button (which is in place of the wing sweep control hat). it could barely take off at the speed i would expect it to, and does not even land on the ship.
~
flying the airplane felt far more accurate to say, an F-4. the maximum g of 7 is reached at around 500 knots, a far cry from the 6.5g the real airplane can pull at 300. at speeds beyond 650, it somehow has problems keeping its nose up (as well as keeping it level) and it takes a mach tuck dive into the deck. the wing sweep being 100% manual is disappointing and entirely backwards as the d model (so ive heard) did away with manual sweep control. however, taking the phoenix rails off as well as the 4 missiles seemed to remedy the flight performance issues, but brings a whole host stability problems from the weight offset. (it also should weigh much more with the fuel & sparrows, as it dropped down to empty weight when the aim54's were removed)
~
the build quality is good in some places, though questionable in others which i wont comment much on since fuselage cutting is still relatively new id say. the cockpit looks rather bland, and is not very useful as the instrumentation does not display very much or isnt quite readable. the cockpit is also more reminiscent of a b-model, with instrumentation from the a and b, as well as a few console panels from the d. i wont delve into every technical bit because id be sitting here writing for an hour or so and i dont really need to.
~
overall the airplane is in an unusable state, which can be remedied in future versions if extra effort to put into it is something youd want to do. either way its your build so do what you feel like lel
will this be able to be multiplied? as in can it apply to the top and the bottom of a fuselage part so gear wells and a cockpit can be placed on the same part
ive noticed a group of these types of people doing one of 2 things
1, reposting animation clips from air crash investigation with the funny vine sad music
2, taking a few minutes to make the most half assed recreation of the crash in sp
and in general have no regard for the fact people died and only think "hehe funny plane video haha it breaks into funny pieces look at that" ＊neuron activation＊
I actually got a comment the other day from some kid "challenging" me to recreate twa 800 on a build of mine probably older than they are
very likely are they all underdeveloped children and id argue theyre probably too young to legally have an account- just in general I feel the site would be a better place if they were weeded out
are buttons/switches planned to get custom inputs (i.e. separate from ags, vtol/trim sliders and flight controls; everything basically) ? cuz if not theres a lot of wasted potential there unless im stoopid and there already is that
i want muh cold start procedures without clogging up the ag list especially that being limited to only 8 items
be able to set vtol engines to specific nozzles the same way car engines work with wheels
+54completely remove every limit on fuselage block dimensions. seriously, you have no idea how tedious it is to deal with that when paneling with super thin parts
+44sp is far too unique to be replaced by anything tbh
+29this just means more communities (that have children in them) are gonna have to deal with this mf drawing softcore porn all over airplanes on the internet
+23you should do it but its a photo of a regular ass 40 year old person
+21be able to change glass opacity with ft
+21(for stuff like window tinting, also display brightness to be able to change on the fly)
very cool and nice you get $13 romania dollars $ i am bogdan romania
+21bogdan fans
+20kinda average lol
+19Well the U.S. Government has control on Hawaii, and presence in Guam, and a few other places in the gulf of Mexico I'd imagine, there's a start to the list.
+19acting like this dude died lmao
+18cringe
+18have an option to stop the view from going to orbit when you crash or something explodes- i wanna experience it from the seat the whole time
+18be able to edit joint strength on rotators and pistons without having to add mass (unless thats an thing with the game engine that i dont know about)
+17It's for people who love themselves too much
+17moves control surfaces on wing parts in the editor doesnt work for anything with funky trees
+16THAT NOT HOW IT WORKS KID
+16literally the 1.11 update
+15make inputs for camera angle (based on where youre looking) for helmet mounted displays in fighters
+15oh no! anyway
+14⬇️ mobile user ⬇️
+14finally that kid did not contribute anything to the community
+14lol
+13hey nice the game is trans just like me
+13the experience i had trying to work this airplane was confusing and clunky. the engine startup is not clearly communicated, which the only thrust i got was pressing the burner button (which is in place of the wing sweep control hat). it could barely take off at the speed i would expect it to, and does not even land on the ship.
+13~
flying the airplane felt far more accurate to say, an F-4. the maximum g of 7 is reached at around 500 knots, a far cry from the 6.5g the real airplane can pull at 300. at speeds beyond 650, it somehow has problems keeping its nose up (as well as keeping it level) and it takes a mach tuck dive into the deck. the wing sweep being 100% manual is disappointing and entirely backwards as the d model (so ive heard) did away with manual sweep control. however, taking the phoenix rails off as well as the 4 missiles seemed to remedy the flight performance issues, but brings a whole host stability problems from the weight offset. (it also should weigh much more with the fuel & sparrows, as it dropped down to empty weight when the aim54's were removed)
~
the build quality is good in some places, though questionable in others which i wont comment much on since fuselage cutting is still relatively new id say. the cockpit looks rather bland, and is not very useful as the instrumentation does not display very much or isnt quite readable. the cockpit is also more reminiscent of a b-model, with instrumentation from the a and b, as well as a few console panels from the d. i wont delve into every technical bit because id be sitting here writing for an hour or so and i dont really need to.
~
overall the airplane is in an unusable state, which can be remedied in future versions if extra effort to put into it is something youd want to do. either way its your build so do what you feel like lel
this is so sad you cant repost their videos anymore 😔😔😔😔😔😔😔
+13unfortunately asteroid boy, your mom
+12will this be able to be multiplied? as in can it apply to the top and the bottom of a fuselage part so gear wells and a cockpit can be placed on the same part
+12ive noticed a group of these types of people doing one of 2 things
+121, reposting animation clips from air crash investigation with the funny vine sad music
2, taking a few minutes to make the most half assed recreation of the crash in sp
and in general have no regard for the fact people died and only think "hehe funny plane video haha it breaks into funny pieces look at that" ＊neuron activation＊
I actually got a comment the other day from some kid "challenging" me to recreate twa 800 on a build of mine probably older than they are
very likely are they all underdeveloped children and id argue theyre probably too young to legally have an account- just in general I feel the site would be a better place if they were weeded out
to make something good you kinda just accept the game is like this and learn how to work around it
+11good riddance that dude is a danger to minors
+11very nice but unfortunately the 10 year olds are enraged once again
+11sp comuniy when the sp don't updates no more
+11are buttons/switches planned to get custom inputs (i.e. separate from ags, vtol/trim sliders and flight controls; everything basically) ? cuz if not theres a lot of wasted potential there unless im stoopid and there already is that
+11i want muh cold start procedures without clogging up the ag list especially that being limited to only 8 items
missile tracking is way more complicated than that
+11yes (dont listen to majakalona they are a single celled organism)
+10i do, and i started making a map addon thats roughly continent sized that surrounds the stock map but its a huge project & it still has a ways to go
+10the part where i do demolition derby as jesus christ riding a bike vs. amongus + log stacker + random things that are actually planes
+10thats sp community being cringe as hell
+10absolutely go nuts and ham and draw whatever you want
lmao that happened once, didnt go very well
+10You wanna hear a funny joke?
+10simplelandea!
THEY HIT THE HEXAGON
+9"titan is" you mean "titan was"
+9you could never understand the worm
+9(funny its laugh guys)
+9@wybz1997 @AWind46 what happened in 1989
+9fuselage jello
+9twitter
+9allow wing parts to have a custom airfoil, basically to customize a wings lift curve per aoa for easier flight models
+9myspace it
+9