Suggestion 1:
I propose to finally fix the fact that parts that have nothing to burn can burn. I have a photo that perfectly shows that the chassis, made of a wheel, two rotators and a spring, is on fire. And it burned as if the fuel tank had been punctured.
Make it so that the parts that have fuel in them can burn (engines go without saying). And make the size of the fire depend on the size of the part and the amount of damage received.
Suggestion 2:
Make an input option for parts such as countermeasure dispenser and cannon.
@PapaKernels
If you're asking for a review, well...
In terms of appearance, you could have done better detailing and picked a slightly better color. You could also play with the shape of the wing.
As a fighter of the 20s and 30s, it has good speed, while maintaining maneuverability. Good firepower for a fighter of that time and a bomb load of 200 kg make it a very dangerous aircraft for the enemy.
The plane has good optimization in terms of details. Also, the landing gear looks good and the cockpit is cool. Also liked the bombs. I can note the detailed description of the plane, with a story about the controls and screenshots. Not a bad picture.
I could do this for all planes, but I would die and test it until early fall.
@BeastHunter Your plane is the only VTOL. And the cool features have points for that as well. All 3 you got for this mechanism. It's simple and I couldn't give more.
I like the logic of the designers: So, we have the gun on the right. So on the left we will put the driver. And the gunner right behind him. The gunner can't see anything, but we don't care about that. We'll give the commander a good view. But only backwards. And the loader right behind the gun. And let's make it so that the shells have to be loaded into the gun on the right, and stand on the left. And reach. These shells will also be loaded from the right. "Squerish, praktish, discomfortish." - the motto of the German designers.
@V1PER5 First, make sure you switch to the camera and not the cockpit.
He is obligated to work. If you don't notice it, maybe the flight speed or turn rate is too low for a noticeable effect.
@tsampoy Yes. Last...
2-nd teaser
@Griffon1
@TheHaggisBasher
@PSsyalperdna
@LaylaSP1
@MuizTheMobileFriendly
@TatsuTheOtaku
1-st teaser.
@LieutenantSOT
@AWESOMENESS360
@3
@JuanNotAnAlt
+1@rexzion
@BeastHunter
And, yes. I'm back, but not completely.
Suggestion 1:
I propose to finally fix the fact that parts that have nothing to burn can burn. I have a photo that perfectly shows that the chassis, made of a wheel, two rotators and a spring, is on fire. And it burned as if the fuel tank had been punctured.
Make it so that the parts that have fuel in them can burn (engines go without saying). And make the size of the fire depend on the size of the part and the amount of damage received.
Suggestion 2:
Make an input option for parts such as countermeasure dispenser and cannon.
I'll think about it, but that's all for now.
+10Now you can eat cookies
+1@One2
@Red0Bulll
?
oh...
T
@Clutch Sorry. My mistake. Already done.
@KobzeR No, fictional, but based on.
@FlyingPatriot
Этот совет сродни "Нет денег на хлеб? Ешьте пирожные!"
Хотя тут есть разница. ПК у меня есть. Но на нём нет СП.
@EchoWhiskey11 OK. Why no?
You shouldn't have made such a teaser. I now want to repeat after you...
I am fast.
@1Tsunami1 It's okay.
Umm...
@JustMiko Thx
@FlyingPatriot ?
+1TigerLAG
+1@StormHuskyy No, these engines didn't have a TVS.
All tags from teasers.
@CattoTheMobileFriendly
@Strikercritsilver @RandomUser09 @ShinyGemsBro
+2@BeastHunter @TatsuTheOtaku @Wibbley
Т
@RC1138Boss no
@Fellex How subtle...
@PapaKernels THX
+1@ShinyGemsBro ok.
Tag me on next.
@ShinyGemsBro Actively produced. Modifications are possible. No problem we can give you a couple of pieces for a test drive.
@Nofferston
+1It is ready. U can check it.
@Tankistrus37 я разошёлся со скринами. И с историей. И с управлением. И с вооружением. На меня просто накатило очень много вдохновения.
+2@djokir это здесь при чём?
+1All tags requested.
@TatsuTheOtaku
@TheHaggisBasher
@BeastHunter
@simpleplayer1
Beauty on a track.
Can you make a copy of my tank? It's not ready yet, it's in the final stages of work, but I can give you the unlisted link.
+2@Riskitforabiscuit no, I used BP of la-9.(and LA-11,lol)
@PapaKernels For metallic it needed more gray. It's too white.
@PapaKernels
If you're asking for a review, well...
In terms of appearance, you could have done better detailing and picked a slightly better color. You could also play with the shape of the wing.
As a fighter of the 20s and 30s, it has good speed, while maintaining maneuverability. Good firepower for a fighter of that time and a bomb load of 200 kg make it a very dangerous aircraft for the enemy.
The plane has good optimization in terms of details. Also, the landing gear looks good and the cockpit is cool. Also liked the bombs. I can note the detailed description of the plane, with a story about the controls and screenshots. Not a bad picture.
I could do this for all planes, but I would die and test it until early fall.
+2@BeastHunter Your plane is the only VTOL. And the cool features have points for that as well. All 3 you got for this mechanism. It's simple and I couldn't give more.
+2GuyFolk, the teaser master.
For what?
I like the logic of the designers: So, we have the gun on the right. So on the left we will put the driver. And the gunner right behind him. The gunner can't see anything, but we don't care about that. We'll give the commander a good view. But only backwards. And the loader right behind the gun. And let's make it so that the shells have to be loaded into the gun on the right, and stand on the left. And reach. These shells will also be loaded from the right. "Squerish, praktish, discomfortish." - the motto of the German designers.
+5Hetzer.
+1